Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.2.0 RC0 release

2023-07-03 Thread Alin Jerpelea
compiler info Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/awork/nuttx/NuttX/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2019-q4-major/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/awork/nuttx/NuttX/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2019-q4-major/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.2.1/lto-wrapper Target: arm-none-eabi Configured with:

[RESULTS] Release Apache NuttX 12.2.0 [RC0]

2023-07-03 Thread Alin Jerpelea
Hi all, The vote to release Apache NuttX 12.2.0-rc0 is now closed. Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. The release has passed with 5 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 Lup Yuen Lee +1 Tomek CEDRO +1 Roberto Butcher +1 Alan C.Assis +1 Alin Jerpelea Vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.2.0 RC0 release

2023-07-03 Thread Alin Jerpelea
+1 Tested on Sony spresense BR Alin On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 12:23 AM Alan C. Assis wrote: > +1 tested using ESP32-Devkit: > > ESP32: > > $ xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc > >

[Article] Booting on RISC-V Star64 JH7110 SBC

2023-07-03 Thread Lee, Lup Yuen
We managed to boot a tiny bit of NuttX on the RISC-V Star64 JH7110 SBC! (Before crashing with a Privileged Instruction Exception) This article explains how we patched a Linux Image to boot NuttX on Star64: https://lupyuen.codeberg.page/articles/linux.html Lup

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.2.0 RC0 release

2023-07-03 Thread Alan C. Assis
+1 tested using ESP32-Devkit: ESP32: $ xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/xtensa-esp32-elf/bin/../libexec/gcc/xtensa-esp32-elf/12.2.0/lto-wrapper Target: xtensa-esp32-elf Configured with:

Re: Bootloaders other than u-boot?

2023-07-03 Thread Sebastien Lorquet
Hi, Yeah, it' not simple. At some point the stm32 spi drivers, for example, could be called several times but only the first one initialized the spi, and it did that only if the SPI block was not enabled yet. It seems to have been fixed by using a priv->initialized member now. If the

Re: Bootloaders other than u-boot?

2023-07-03 Thread Tomek CEDRO
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:03 PM Petro Karashchenko wrote: > The de-init part is a bit tricky here. I think that u-boot enables clocking > for various parts of the SoC and mux pins used in bootloader, so if I > recall correctly the clocks are not shutted down and pins are not > de-muxed to reset

Re: Bootloaders other than u-boot?

2023-07-03 Thread Petro Karashchenko
Hi, The de-init part is a bit tricky here. I think that u-boot enables clocking for various parts of the SoC and mux pins used in bootloader, so if I recall correctly the clocks are not shutted down and pins are not de-muxed to reset value state when the OS is booted. The best would be if the OS

Re: [OT] A nice board to run NuttX

2023-07-03 Thread Alan C. Assis
Sorry, I forgot to put the link to buy it: https://aliexpress.com/item/1005005692235592.html On 7/3/23, Alan C. Assis wrote: > Case someone here didn't see it: > > https://www.cnx-software.com/2023/06/30/esp32-s3-board-features-2-8-inch-display-blackberry-like-keyboard-lorawan/ > > I bought one

[OT] A nice board to run NuttX

2023-07-03 Thread Alan C. Assis
Case someone here didn't see it: https://www.cnx-software.com/2023/06/30/esp32-s3-board-features-2-8-inch-display-blackberry-like-keyboard-lorawan/ I bought one with LoRa 915MHz (freq used here in Brazil). Should be nice to run the NX Window Manager, TWM4NX, DirectFB2 or the PinePhone graphic

Re: Bootloaders other than u-boot?

2023-07-03 Thread Sebastien Lorquet
Le 01/07/2023 à 18:41, Gregory Nutt a écrit : On 7/1/2023 10:27 AM, Tim Hardisty wrote: Lots of work to do a full u-boot replacement, yes. But a basic one using existing NuttX stuff such as RNDIS, dfu, mtd etc. - for MY board at least - would not be much work. He said...naively! You often

Re: Prebuilt SmartFS file system (Pico)

2023-07-03 Thread Sebastien Lorquet
Hi, The automatic mount of the ROMFS assumes that it is stored at a predefined location in the board config, that it will be mounted at /etc, and that it is mounted for the goal of using rc scripts, which may not be the case at all. I have a changes in my local apps directory that decouples