Re: Comment for AVR GitHub issue 16444 and PR 16443

2025-05-29 Thread kr . git
Hi, I don't think updating the comment can do any harm so why not. And since I have a fresh experience of trying to add support for new AVR family/board, I can certainly imagine that I would be confused if I noticed the discrepancy between the comment about the variable and its initialization

Re: [Q&A] LTO Marked as "experimental"

2025-05-29 Thread Xiang Xiao
We already use LTO in several commercial products, all launched successfully. On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 10:01 PM Javier Alonso wrote: > Hello, > > I'm interested in using LTO on our current project. It concerns me a little > bit the option is marked as "experimental", and finding nothing > when l

Re: NuttX Logo for rocket/PCBs

2025-05-29 Thread Matteo Golin
Alan, do you still have the file from that PCB? The NX portion would be good for a rocket if I could add the diamond around it. Matteo On Thu, May 29, 2025, 7:16 PM Matteo Golin wrote: > That's a really good idea! I might have to research how well that would > show up in a vinyl sticker (solid

Re: NuttX Logo for rocket/PCBs

2025-05-29 Thread Matteo Golin
That's a really good idea! I might have to research how well that would show up in a vinyl sticker (solid might be better there), but for a PCB that's perfect! Matteo On Thu, May 29, 2025, 11:35 AM Alan C. Assis wrote: > I don't know, I prefer something that resembles the original logo. > > In

Re: NuttX Logo for rocket/PCBs

2025-05-29 Thread Matteo Golin
Okay this is a very rough example, but this is what I was thinking (also, I would probably make the staggered outline of "NX" a little thicker so it's more visible). What do you think? On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 11:14 AM Matteo Golin wrote: > Maybe that shadowed area could be a solid colour? > > O

Re: NuttX Logo for rocket/PCBs

2025-05-29 Thread Matteo Golin
Maybe that shadowed area could be a solid colour? Or the "NX" could be all solid except that shadowed area, and the diamond outline could be solid. Let me see if I can do that in gimp as a prototype. Matteo On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 11:10 AM Alan C. Assis wrote: > You are welcome Matteo, > > Loo

Re: NuttX Logo for rocket/PCBs

2025-05-29 Thread Alan C. Assis
You are welcome Matteo, Looking at it with more critical thinking I saw it needs some improvements in the area simulating the gray color, see attached image. BR, Alan On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 9:46 AM Alan C. Assis wrote: > Hi Matteo, > > I have this attached monocolor version that I use on PCB

Re: Comment for AVR GitHub issue 16444 and PR 16443

2025-05-29 Thread Matteo Golin
Hello KR, No need to apologize! Thank you for all your help on this issue. I actually didn't know about these "trampoline" sections, I had to look them up after your email. If you think it might make the code clearer, I can update the comments about `_eronly` to reflect that it is no longer the en

Re: NuttX Logo for rocket/PCBs

2025-05-29 Thread Matteo Golin
Thank you Alan! It looks great. Best, Matteo On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 8:47 AM Alan C. Assis wrote: > Hi Matteo, > > I have this attached monocolor version that I use on PCBs, I will send you > the SVG version as well, since here that file extension will be blocked. > > BR, > > Alan > > On Wed, M

[Q&A] LTO Marked as "experimental"

2025-05-29 Thread Javier Alonso
Hello, I'm interested in using LTO on our current project. It concerns me a little bit the option is marked as "experimental", and finding nothing when looking in the forums, commits, or mail archive. Can anyone illustrate to me on the latest status, or any future development plans, if any? Thank

Re: NuttX Logo for rocket/PCBs

2025-05-29 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Matteo, I have this attached monocolor version that I use on PCBs, I will send you the SVG version as well, since here that file extension will be blocked. BR, Alan On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:20 PM Matteo Golin wrote: > Hello everyone, > > CU InSpace would like to feature the NuttX logo am