I've seen this problem before which revolved around flow control;
essentially soft versus hard flow control (xmit off/ xmit on)
Are you using a null modem cable? If not that may give you the accuracy
you're looking for, else hardware flow control is the only other
possibility if it is flow
time rebuilt kernel can load user land apps in the ROMFS defined by an existing
"romfs_boot.c".
Regards,
yf
Original
From:"Bill Rees"< redskyo...@icloud.com.INVALID >;
Date:2024/1/1 10:49
To:&q
Well I screwed up on this. The makefile actually runs before including
Board.mk which contains the real targets so the default target becomes
the one in the src/Makefile.
Fundamentally this Makefile should not contain any targets.
On 12/31/2023 6:46 PM, Bill Rees wrote:
Out of
efile like below:
clean::
$(echo "board level clean")
Then when I tried "make clean" under $(TOPDIR), there is no more
errors but the rule I added didn't fire.
I guess something else is still missing. The top level makefile
doesn't trigger my board
my board level double-colon target.
Regards,
yf
Original
From:"Bill Rees"< redskyo...@icloud.com.INVALID >;
Date:2023/12/31 9:51
To:"dev"< dev@nuttx.apache.org >;
Subject:Re: Makefile vs Make.defs
You're welco
command at the $(TOPDIR) and the contents in the board source folder
(i.e. "boards/
Original
From:"Bill Rees"< redskyo...@icloud.com.INVALID >;
Date:2023/12/17 16:32
To:"dev"< dev@nuttx
Running make where Makefile exists runs that Makefile.
Running make where you have a Make.defs won't do anything.
On 12/16/2023 8:55 PM, yfliu2008 wrote:
Hi,
It seems that some board source folder uses Makefile and some uses Make.defs:
boards/risc-v/hpm6750/hpm6750evk2/src/Makefile
Hi All;
From the discussion the reason for CONFIG_DEBUG_NOOPT to fail is
already known. Is this true?
Confused and ignorant
Bill Rees
On 9/18/2023 8:55 AM, Tiago Medicci Serrano wrote:
Hi Mike,
NuttX + Espressif's SoCs are intended to be built with optimization
enabled. Othe
Hi Mike;
I haven't seen any screen dump of the error message(s). Are there any logs?
Bill
On 9/18/2023 9:04 AM, Mike Moretti wrote:
This is the kind of thing that really should be documented somewhere.
In bold, "DO NOT TURN OFF OPTIMIZATION because...". Either that or
disallow it being chang
Does the BSD license,and maybe others too, allow re-licensing?
Certainly one way to solve this if true is to simply change the license.
On 3/17/2023 10:05 AM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:07 PM Alan C. Assis wrote:
On 3/17/23, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15,
.
None of the code made it out of legal review so no opportunity to
upstream arose
Bill Rees
>
> On Aug 17, 2022 at 1:03 PM, (mailto:acas...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone, By the chance, did you know if someone alr
+1
Maintaining code coherency (including docs) is YUUGely more difficult
when separate repos are involved.
If the main reason for creating a second repo is to more cleanly have
two doc directories maybe Markdown isn't the answer you want anyway.
If the focus on pretty print is to use RST the
12 matches
Mail list logo
