Re: [VOTE] - votes must say [VOTE]

2019-12-22 Thread Gregory Nutt
I thought I was being humorous in replying with +1.  But [VOTE] is in the title so I guess this is a real, binding vote.  That wasn't clear from the text.  I am so confused.  Anway, my +1 vote still stands, just not as funny anymore. On 12/22/2019 9:14 AM, Gregory Nutt wrote: +1 (sorry, I

Re: [VOTE] - votes must say [VOTE]

2019-12-22 Thread Gregory Nutt
+1 (sorry, I couldn't help it) On 12/22/2019 9:13 AM, David Sidrane wrote: All, Let's dispense with the ALL ambiguity We should assume if it does not say [VOTE] it is not a vote? David -Original Message- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 22,

Re: [VOTE] - votes must say [VOTE]

2019-12-22 Thread David Sidrane
+1 binding On 2019/12/22 15:13:03, David Sidrane wrote: > All, > > Let's dispense with the ALL ambiguity > > We should assume if it does not say [VOTE] it is not a vote? > > David > > > > -Original Message- > From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday,