On 6/6/2023 4:46 PM, Alan C. Assis wrote:
Hi Fotis,
On 6/6/23, Fotis Panagiotopoulos wrote:
Hello,
I just noticed the option STM32_TICKLESS_SYSTICK for the STM32.
However, it seems that it does nothing.
After a source code search, this option is not used anywhere.
There is no tickless impl
On 6/6/2023 4:47 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
On 6/6/2023 4:31 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:44 PM Fotis Panagiotopoulos
wrote:
Hello,
I just noticed the option STM32_TICKLESS_SYSTICK for the STM32.
However, it seems that it does nothing.
After a source code search, this
On 6/6/2023 4:31 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:44 PM Fotis Panagiotopoulos
wrote:
Hello,
I just noticed the option STM32_TICKLESS_SYSTICK for the STM32.
However, it seems that it does nothing.
After a source code search, this option is not used anywhere.
There is no tic
Hi Fotis,
On 6/6/23, Fotis Panagiotopoulos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed the option STM32_TICKLESS_SYSTICK for the STM32.
> However, it seems that it does nothing.
>
> After a source code search, this option is not used anywhere.
> There is no tickless implementation that supports the systic
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:44 PM Fotis Panagiotopoulos
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed the option STM32_TICKLESS_SYSTICK for the STM32.
> However, it seems that it does nothing.
>
> After a source code search, this option is not used anywhere.
> There is no tickless implementation that supports
