Hi Justin,
On 1/16/20, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The linux bash shell works on windows 10 (via WSL) these days. Is that an
> option?
>
Yes, it is already supported by default:
https://acassis.wordpress.com/2018/01/10/how-to-build-nuttx-on-windows-10/
Should be nice if you could try it. I
I would prefer that we keep the ability to build on native Windows. That is
still the most prolific OS and is used heavily in the embedded development
world. Every microcontroller vendor I've worked with seems to support
Windows based tools first and other platforms as an option. Sometimes
Hi, Greg, may I ask where you find the right mips gcc toolchain?
I haven't found an official prebuilt mips gcc toolchain yet(mips.com
connect failed here). Or build it from source code.
I was talking with Abdelatif about this a few days ago. He is the
MIPS/PIC32 expert on the team. We are
Item 2 isn't a good option: a broken build system just give the user a
very bad impression that OS self isn't workable or stable. It's better
that we fully support Windows native or remove from the list at all.
What I means the full is that all config must pass the automation
build and run the
+1 FIX THE WINDOWS NATIVE SUPPORT && add a native test environment
-Original Message-
From: Alin Jerpelea [mailto:jerpe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 4:06 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Windows Native support?
I am for option 3 FIX THE WINDOWS
I am for option 3 FIX THE WINDOWS NATIVE SUPPORT
Okay. Let's consider the status quo unacceptable. The status quo being
that Windows Native support is a DIY project and not necessarily ready
for use "out of the box." That brings us back to a binary decision
Remove or Fix (which is easier
Thanks very much, It really works after correct some mips-elf-gcc/ld etc
symlinks.
In addition, I notice http://www.nuttx.org/Documentation/NuttX.html say gnu
toolchains based on buildroot
for many architectures. So for AVR gcc toolchains, I just found
What I means the full is that all config must pass the automation
build and run the build system regularly like other host.
Yes, the problem is a circular one. Why is the native build always out
of date? Because it is not tested. Why don't we test it? Because it
is out of date.
There
Hi Haitao,
You can use this https://github.com/PinguinoIDE/pinguino-compilers
Even though it hasn't been updated for years, it does the job.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:46 PM Haitao Liu wrote:
>
> Hi, Greg, may I ask where you find the right mips gcc toolchain?
> I haven't found an official
If my understanding is correct, the machine need donate to ASF, is that correct?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:25 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote:
>
> I can offer testing setup with a machine that builds daily all configs and
> exports the logs on github help us spot the issues?
>
> Alin
>
>
> On Wed, Jan
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:45 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> But there
> are a minority of Windows SDK developers that require pure Native
> support, not via some intermediary framework. I don't know the full
> reasoning; I am not an SDK/IDE person. I always believe the reason
> involves Visual
TLDR: I think we need to make a "CI requirements and design" Draft Proposal
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Draft+Proposals)
---
Hi,
I think that in order to get a working CI as soon as possible we need to
please define a plan in a coordinated way.
I think "perfection" is the
HI,
Projects can have their own resources but we would prefer that they were (for
security and continuity reasons) maintained by Infra. If you want too donate a
build machine to Infra you need to involve them in the conversation as I’ve
previously mentioned. This would also need to be agreed
Hi,
I think working on a CI document together it a great idea.
> - What architectures we want to include: all of them? (list them) some of
> them can be deferred until "Perfect CI"? do Apache Jenkins have the machine
> for that architectures? if not ... are there emulators? and the toolchains?
>
Thanks Greg and Abdelatif. I am going to use the Pinguino toolchain at
first to let it work, and try the buildroot way later with free time.
Gregory Nutt 于2020年1月16日周四 下午10:26写道：
>
> > In addition, I notice http://www.nuttx.org/Documentation/NuttX.html say
> gnu
> > toolchains based on
Justin Mclean 于2020年1月17日周五 上午5:19写道：
> Hi,
>
> I think working on a CI document together it a great idea.
>
>
I also agree with Miguel's idea to working on a CI document. So save and
inspire more best practices in CI.
> - What architectures we want to include: all of them? (list them) some
The Windows Cygwin build is a lot slower but it works. (See my video). My vote
goes to keeping Windows. It keeps Nuttx followers and Windows is, as stated
before, really making effort to support the IoT concept. And its also getting
better in Open Source projects. Also their Cloud (Edge)
Hi,
A project Apache NuttX. which has just entered the Incubator is planning a
small conference in Tokyo in March.[1] This has been in the planning stages
before the project joined the Incubator.
There are PPMC members on the conference committee, but currently the
conference wouldn’t meet
Hi,
Sorry it’s May not Match.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Team,
I would be glad to contribute.
Regards
Nitish
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:23 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A project Apache NuttX. which has just entered the Incubator is planning a
> small conference in Tokyo in March.[1] This has been in the planning
> stages before the project
I am for option 3 FIX THE WINDOWS NATIVE SUPPORT
An initial effort is worth updating the support and I we can add a native
test environment to be sure that it builds daily
Alin
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:22 PM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:25 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > I
Hi, Greg, may I ask where you find the right mips gcc toolchain?
I haven't found an official prebuilt mips gcc toolchain yet(mips.com
connect failed here). Or build it from source code.
Gregory Nutt 于2020年1月9日周四 上午11:55写道：
>
> > Thanks, I think we can firstly get start in Linux and Windows.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:25 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> I would like to open a discussion for 72 hours then call a vote. The
> topic is "Should we remove Windows native build support?"
>
> What is the Windows native build? Is is a build option that supports
> building NuttX in a pure Windows
The problem is not what we choose as bug reporting system but that we all
agree on something and we use it
Each tool has advantages and disadvantages so JIRA or github should be OK
from my side.
Alin
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:59 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > Where does the GitHub Projects
I can offer testing setup with a machine that builds daily all configs and
exports the logs on github help us spot the issues?
Alin
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:02 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> Well, we still don't have a clean build yet 8( I got to configuration
> 342 out of the 420 then it failed
25 matches
Mail list logo
