-Original Message-
From: Frank-Christian Kruegel
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2023 9:01 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hardcoded Pin mux, pad control and Drive Strength (AKA
Slew-rate and Frequency) Settings #1570
Am 10.04.2023 um 14:51 schrieb David Sidrane:
> If I attempt to
Right now we’re building a Feature Phone with NuttX on PinePhone. To make
things simpler, we’re writing down everything we know about the 4G LTE
Modem, and how it works inside PinePhone…
1. What’s the Quectel EG25-G LTE Modem
2. How it’s connected inside PinePhone
3. How we make Phone Calls and
I agree with Frank-Christian on that!
Also, is there some official ERRATA from ST about this
slew-rate/frequency for STM32H7 ?
Is this really a chip issue or some board specific issue?
BR,
Alan
On 4/10/23, Frank-Christian Kruegel wrote:
> Am 10.04.2023 um 14:51 schrieb David Sidrane:
>
>> If
Maybe it is better to try a smaller C compiler.
Like TinyCC: https://bellard.org/tcc / https://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git
Currently it is only for x86/x64 and ARM (with RISC-V is in development).
The tcc is small (about 100KB) so it could work even on some microcontrollers.
Even if you get GCC
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Lorquet
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 9:58 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hardcoded Pin mux, pad control and Drive Strength (AKA
Slew-rate and Frequency) Settings #1570
Thanks for the notification.
[DBS] Thank you for your response.
Your
Am 10.04.2023 um 14:51 schrieb David Sidrane:
If I attempt to rephrase the proposal: Starting from a commit in a
future, stm32h7 GPIO definitions will not include speed indications
anymore, and these will have to be added manually in board.h, but ONLY
if the LEGACY_PINMAP is not set?
[DBS] Yes.
