Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

Hi Simon, The idea is not to limit users choice, but have standard connector with known pinouts to test different microcontrollers. For people who develop tailored hardware it will be very useful because you can develop an internal baseboard to test some ideas and just exchance the MCU module to

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

Hi Nathan, I like your suggested organization, but I don't like the idea of including it under Apache, because it is not an Apache project, even the license is different, note it is Creative Common 0. Maybe we should select a better hardware license but I didn't see it in the Github combobox opti

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

Hi Alan, What about copying known standards. Like Phytec SOM, Toradex, Kontron. That would attract market shares. Need to fill your list with my boards and start testing. It's in the backlog for too long. Simon -- Hard- and Softwaredevelopment Consultant Geschäftsführung: Simon Filgis USt-IdNr

Re: Sv: Sv: RFC: fix race conditions in drivers/serial/serial.c

Hello, thanks. Here is a response to xiaoxiang781216's review: could we extract a common typedef to avoid #ifdef/#else/#endif spread the code base? Can do - sbuf_size_t seems unused throughout the whole tree so I'll add that to serial.h. can we change to ARCH_HAVE_8BIT_BUFSIZE and put int

Re: Sv: RFC: fix of atomic functions on AVR

Hi, thanks both to you and to the people who did the review. On 2025-06-09 10:10, alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote: Hi KR, your patch has been submitted https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16498 Best regards Alin Från: kr@kerogit.eu Skickat: den 5 juni 2025 1

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

Hi Tomek, The idea is to have a baseboard that could be used with different MCU modules, similar to Mikroe Fusion ARM: https://www.mikroe.com/fusion-for-arm But in our case the MCU modules are not limited only to ARM. We could use any MCU currently supported by NuttX, because the common signals (

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

Hi all, I have a few suggestions:: 1. I suggest to request INFRA to create a new repository for the design and implementation of hardware, which initially will contain the NuttX Standard Board hardware. I suggest the name nuttx-hardware. 2. Within the nuttx-hardware repository, I suggest to have

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

I don't like the term standard hardware. Maybe because I create tailored hardware for a living. I love Nuttx for the flexibility. Please do not limit choice of hardware. -- Hard- and Softwaredevelopment Consultant Geschäftsführung: Simon Filgis USt-IdNr.: DE305343278 ISO9001:2015

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

Aaah! NuttX BaseBoard is more self-exlpanatory thanks Alan! :-) I played like this in the 1990's with 8051 but instead having one single board I created separate modules that were attached with 2.54 wires and f/m-connectors this allowed me to reuse different modules with different boards and appli

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

Hi Tomek, Thank you for those nice suggestions. 1) Yes, even some companies like Freescale (now NXP) used that idea in the past, i.e. DEMOQE board: https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/user-guide/DEMOQE128UM.pdf The MCU module boards need to have a minimum size to fit the connector and also we need to thi