[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Mayur updated OFBIZ-2329:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: Release Branch 9.04)
Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch
I don't know about this, what if I used my (or yours for that matter)
email address as my userLoginId andrew.zene...@hotwaxmedia.com that is
31 right there. Its really tough to say how much space is needed for
such a field. 100 might be enough, but it is the change worth it? My
vote is no,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-2344:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
problem with renderer in trunk version 767770 with
Thanks Andrew for your reply.
I agree on your point that in some companies they prefer email address
for user login.
I am fine by not changing it but instead of keeping length 255 , 100
would be good option on data base perspective (I think :-) ).
I don't have any specific reason in my mind
It dont think we should change that. In DB only characters used are taking
place so I don't see the trouble
Jacques
From: Ashish Vijaywargiya ashish.vijaywarg...@hotwaxmedia.com
Thanks Andrew for your reply.
I agree on your point that in some companies they prefer email address
for user
Yes, I agree... let's leave it all as-is. The number is a limit to the
size and has nothing to do with the actual amount of space required to
store the field... ie it is a VARCHAR and will only use the space
required for the length of the actual value.
Whatever the case, if it's not
It should has included the widget boundary comments, do you found any
problem?
2009/4/22 Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
I am now looking into this.
Jacopo
On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
Thank you for all your work on this! I noticed that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12701830#action_12701830
]
WeizhanGuo commented on OFBIZ-2345:
---
Jacopo,
I will update my local ofbiz to the last
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2331.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Release Branch 9.04
Hi Ashish,
For the moment I did not find enough time to look seriously at this. So only manual changes are use for now. I hope to have a look
at this next week
Jacques
From: Ashish Nagar ashish.na...@hotwaxmedia.com
Thanks Jacques,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2260 was
Hi Andrew,
From: Andrew Zeneski andrew.zene...@hotwaxmedia.com
I think this is due to the new HTML security, but now we have these #160; codes floating all over the place. I'm not sure what
the best solution for this is, but I thought I would check in a change like this:
This is not as
I can't remember the reason for adding the CommonEmptyHeader label but
I'm wondering if we should consider removing it and find another
solution to whatever problem it solved?
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 23/04/2009, at 8:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi
I think it is related to the situation where you want to specify an
empty content for the title attribute in form widgets. if title
element is missing or is set to title= then the widgets render it
with the name of the field or simialr.
Jacopo
On Apr 23, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Scott Gray
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12701858#action_12701858
]
Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-2345:
thanks jacopo for the quick fixes...perhaps also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12701861#action_12701861
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-2344:
--
Hans,
I am unable to recreate this
I miss this list before :(
Congratulations!
Thanks to everyone.
Weizhan Guo
2009/4/18 Bruno Busco bruno.bu...@gmail.com
Best wishes to OFBiz 9.4 !
Many thanks to everyone
-Bruno
2009/4/17 Pranay Pandey pranay.pan...@hotwaxmedia.com
Thanks David.
This is another milestone
I am fine with your, Andrew Jacques thoughts on this.
Thanks let's keep it as it is.
--
Ashish
David E Jones wrote:
Yes, I agree... let's leave it all as-is. The number is a limit to the
size and has nothing to do with the actual amount of space required to
store the field... ie it is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-2345.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the report Hans, this is fixed in rev. 767860
Thanks Guo for
That's probably something we can fix in the widget code isn't it? If
the title attribute is missing then use the field name otherwise
render whatever is specified in the title even if it is just an empty
string.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 23/04/2009, at
Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just about a portlet)
PortletPortletCategory -- PortletCategoryMember (as in
ProductCategoryMember)
IMO, they
+1
Divesh
Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just about a portlet)
PortletPortletCategory -- PortletCategoryMember (as in
That is finehowever you will write also a migration program and
enter it in the
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Revisions+Requiring+Data+Migration
document how to do it?
it is worth the effort?
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 15:58 +0530, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I would like
Hi Hans,
I know very well the pain behind doing such modifications, like you
mentioned (thanks). But still I would vote for these changes, at least
this would make the current entities more logical and easy to
understand and interpret and yes it is worth the effort in IMHO.
Vikas
On Apr
Change Copyright Year
--
Key: OFBIZ-2346
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2346
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: ALL COMPONENTS
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya updated OFBIZ-2346:
---
Attachment: Copyright_Year_Change.patch
Here is the patch.
--
Ashish Vijaywargiya
+1
Nicolas
Divesh Dutta a écrit :
+1
Divesh
Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just about a portlet)
PortletPortletCategory --
BIRT Component
--
Key: OFBIZ-2347
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2347
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Environment: software
Reporter: Chatree Srichart
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chatree Srichart updated OFBIZ-2347:
Attachment: birt.zip
birt component
BIRT Component
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chatree Srichart updated OFBIZ-2347:
Description:
I have component for use Eclipse BIRT as report builder.
Features:
1. BIRT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
André Herbst updated OFBIZ-2290:
Fix Version/s: (was: SVN trunk)
Affects Version/s: (was: SVN trunk)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
André Herbst updated OFBIZ-2326:
Affects Version/s: (was: SVN trunk)
Release Branch 9.04
Danish
I would to use OFBiz as OSGI
Key: OFBIZ-2348
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2348
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Wish
Components: ALL COMPONENTS
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
André Herbst updated OFBIZ-2327:
Affects Version/s: (was: SVN trunk)
Release Branch 9.04
Danish
I agree with you that it needs to be longer than 20 characters, and my
vote on changing it would be no also.
But, I did have an issue when I first started using OFBiz because the
255 length caused index keys to exceed the maximum length allowed by my
database. I changed the length to 100 on
David E Jones wrote:
Yes, I agree... let's leave it all as-is. The number is a limit to the
size and has nothing to do with the actual amount of space required to
store the field... ie it is a VARCHAR and will only use the space
required for the length of the actual value.
Just a little side
You can run tests for a specific ofbiz component (e.g. entity, etc)
with the following command:
ofbiz$ java -jar ofbiz.jar -test -component=entity
This is described in the following link:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Apache+OFBiz+Technical+Production+Setup+Guide
Brett
On Tue, Apr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert resolved OFBIZ-2336.
Resolution: Fixed
Add a style guide to ofbiz.apache.org so using styles are easier in the future
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert resolved OFBIZ-2289.
Resolution: Fixed
Modify build.ofbiz.org and log.ofbiz.org to support the new Release Branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702001#action_12702001
]
Bilgin Ibryam commented on OFBIZ-2346:
--
Hi Ashish,
what about using javascript in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702000#action_12702000
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-2347:
--
Thanks Chatree.
Could you please re
Well there is an option which might be viable. We could simply wrap
all values in the uiLabelMap using StringUtil.wrapString(). This will
allow HTML characters in the UI labels again and shouldn't be too much
of a security risk, as only developers have access to these strings.
Thoughts?
+1 to David's -1 :)
I totally agree with these points, to me the name change is very minor
and not worth the pain which it will cause.
Andrew
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:39 PM, David E Jones wrote:
-1.
In fact, a big huge -1. I don't think those names make it easier to
understand but rather
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chatree Srichart updated OFBIZ-2347:
Attachment: birt.zip
BIRT Component
--
Key: OFBIZ-2347
I had a look into this; the code is the following one:
if (this.title == null || formElement.hasAttribute(title)) {
this.title = formElement.getAttribute(title);
}
the tricky thing is that formElement.hasAttribute(title) returns
true even if the title is not set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chatree Srichart updated OFBIZ-2347:
Attachment: (was: birt.zip)
BIRT Component
--
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702031#action_12702031
]
Chatree Srichart commented on OFBIZ-2347:
-
Thanks Jacopo...
I had been re attach
On Apr 23, 2009, at 11:09 PM, David E Jones wrote:
-1.
In fact, a big huge -1. I don't think those names make it easier to
understand but rather more difficult, and then they are also not
grouped so well in the entity data maintenance and other webtools
pages, etc.
Are we so
On Apr 23, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
On Apr 23, 2009, at 11:09 PM, David E Jones wrote:
-1.
In fact, a big huge -1. I don't think those names make it easier to
understand but rather more difficult, and then they are also not
grouped so well in the entity data maintenance
Here is a patch which does exactly this, and appears to work with just
a little testing. I'm just not sure of the total impact it will cause.
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
Well there is an option which might be viable. We could simply wrap
all values in the
Hi Adrian,
thanks for working at this; do you want me to write the 4 freemarker
methods? I can quickly do this if you want.
Jacopo
Begin forwarded message:
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/screen/
MacroScreenRenderer.java
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Zeneski updated OFBIZ-2349:
--
Attachment: WrapResourceMap.patch
Allow HTML Characters in UILabels
Allow HTML Characters in UILabels
-
Key: OFBIZ-2349
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2349
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
FYI the patch is here, not in the email...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2349
Andrew
On Apr 23, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
Here is a patch which does exactly this, and appears to work with
just a little testing. I'm just not sure of the total impact it will
Why would we want to put HTML in the UI labels?
-Adrian
Andrew Zeneski wrote:
Here is a patch which does exactly this, and appears to work with just a
little testing. I'm just not sure of the total impact it will cause.
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
Well there is an
Now that I think of it, I only added the macros to the HTML macro
template. You could do the rest if you want.
-Adrian
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adrian,
thanks for working at this; do you want me to write the 4 freemarker
methods? I can quickly do this if you want.
Jacopo
Begin
Yes, one of the guidelines (or maybe a better term is best practice)
is to not have HTML in translation labels. There are a few reasons for
this that have come up over time:
1. ability to use labels in non-webapp contexts
2. be able to externally format/style the labels, perhaps
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702052#action_12702052
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2349:
I don't think this is a good approach. If any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert closed OFBIZ-2335.
--
Let's left align that footer text again on ofbiz.apache.org (and other sites)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert closed OFBIZ-2336.
--
Add a style guide to ofbiz.apache.org so using styles are easier in the future
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert closed OFBIZ-2287.
--
Update ofbiz.apache.org, log.ofbiz.org and build.ofbiz.org to have the footer
stuck to the bottom of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert closed OFBIZ-2289.
--
Modify build.ofbiz.org and log.ofbiz.org to support the new Release Branch
Nightly updates.
Fair enough, then in this case this specific field CommonEmptyHeader
should be just a single space. The label manager should define its own
special label which is not used anywhere else.
Andrew
On Apr 23, 2009, at 2:42 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Yes, one of the guidelines (or maybe a
Yes, it should. I haven't looked into this enough to know what the
issue is with that... it could be that the label parsing code is
calling trim() or something on the label text coming in so these get
turned into an empty String... and if so changing that might be the
easiest/best way to
In the XML property files, the text to be displayed is not an element's
attribute, it's the element's value.
I would work on this, but it seems the label manager is broken. All I
get is an error message.
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
Yes, it should. I haven't looked into this enough to
Hello Jacques,
I did few adjustments in the images attached their in Practice
Application.
Now looks little better have a look Practice Application (Hello
World...)
Thanks Regards
--
Pranay Pandey
On Apr 22, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Jacques Le Roux (JIRA) wrote:
The pages should be
360! Who nowadays works still with such hardware ?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
David E Jones wrote:
Yes, I agree... let's leave it all as-is. The number is a limit to the
size and has nothing to do with the actual amount of space required to
store the field... ie it is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702125#action_12702125
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2290:
André,
These changes will be only allowed
That was back in the mid 1980s.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
360! Who nowadays works still with such hardware ?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
David E Jones wrote:
Yes, I agree... let's leave it all as-is. The number is a limit to
the size and has nothing to do with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702148#action_12702148
]
Ryan Foster commented on OFBIZ-2341:
Sorry, what I mean to say is that docs.ofbiz.org
Showing up on create of contact mech
Key: OFBIZ-2350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2350
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: John D. Hays
--
This message is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Hays updated OFBIZ-2350:
Description:
The Following Errors Occurred:
Error calling event:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chatree Srichart updated OFBIZ-2348:
Description:
I would like to use OFBiz as OSGI (Equinox or Apache Felix). My problem is
Okay, the Label Manager issue is fixed in revision 768123.
-Adrian
--- On Thu, 4/23/09, Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com wrote:
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Subject: Re: #160; Codes
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Thursday, April 23, 2009, 1:23 PM
In the XML property files, the text
sure, I will do.
On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:31 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Now that I think of it, I only added the macros to the HTML macro
template. You could do the rest if you want.
-Adrian
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adrian,
thanks for working at this; do you want me to write the 4
74 matches
Mail list logo
