[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259409#comment-13259409
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4501:
One month, still on it? ;)
Bump!
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Hi Adam,
I resurrect this message (related to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2042) because I think it's worth it.
At this moment you said you will have something for us. Could you confirm please? Else I will try to
Post Easter bump...
Nobody interested? Until when? Maybe wait slim-down end?
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: Sam Hamilton
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: JDK SE 6 EOL
Post Christmas Bump….
On 17 Dec 2011, at
Hi Jacques,
Trunk is compiling fine with openjdk 7?
Regards,
Hans
On 04/23/2012 01:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Post Easter bump...
Nobody interested? Until when? Maybe wait slim-down end?
Jacques
- Original Message -
*From:* Sam Hamilton mailto:s...@sh81.com
*To:*
Not sure who you intend to send it but I believe 'argument' is the least little
thing and OFBiz community can't afford it, so better apply some common sense
while throwing away anything towards this community.
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 21, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Maybe you should
Jacques Le Roux schrieb:
[..]
I was at the origin of this demand. Christian handled it with infra
(demo.old.ofbiz domain), so it's ready, it's just a matter of
redirection to ask to infra.
I'm about to get it finally running..
Christian
At the moment (and actually at any moment ;o), I don't think infra has the
resources for this kind of demand...
Did someone test locally? Could someone install a CI for it on its own?
Jacques
Sam Hamilton wrote:
+1 on making sure that OFBiz runs without problems on Java 7 before trying to
Actually I was more interested about running under Oracle 7 because of EOL of
Java SE 6 in July 2012
Also for Sam's question:
a) no
b) nope I guess
Jacques
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
Hi Jacques,
Trunk is compiling fine with openjdk 7?
Regards,
Hans
On 04/23/2012
Thanks Christian,
From: Christian Geisert christian.geis...@isu-gmbh.de
Jacques Le Roux schrieb:
[..]
I was at the origin of this demand. Christian handled it with infra
(demo.old.ofbiz domain), so it's ready, it's just a matter of
redirection to ask to infra.
I'm about to get it finally
Hi Jacques,
I believe it is not good to expose potential end users to something that
can be expected to be broken (meaning trunk) as a demo environment, because
of the high rate of development taking place in that environment.
I also believe that Jacopo said that something is in the rules,
On Apr 23, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
I also believe that Jacopo said that something is in the rules, regulations
and/or guidelines of the ASF about the same issue.
We simply have to make sure it is always clear when a resource is unreleased
and intended for OFBiz developers only
I agree.
Demo environments is not for OFBiz developers.
If you want to have an OFBiz developer to have a viewpoint on trunk where
they can experience what has been changed in trunk I believe that there are
betters means available and in place already (SVN, CI reports, etc)
As far as I can see
What we could do is still support it but don't link it from main site and such
Because it's very convenient for committers to have another running trunk system
Jacques
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
I agree.
Demo environments is not for OFBiz developers.
If you want to have an
This is a reasonable compromise.
My suggestion for the URL regarding the latest stable release:
http(s)://demo.ofbiz.apache.org
or:
http(s)://demo-ofbiz.apache.org
Regards,
Pierre
Op 23 april 2012 10:25 schreef Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
het volgende:
What we could do is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-4130:
Attachment: OFBIZ-4130-MultiTenant-visibilty.patch
This patch fixes the issue that tenant-admins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259490#comment-13259490
]
Hans Bakker edited comment on OFBIZ-4130 at 4/23/12 10:07 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259490#comment-13259490
]
Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-4130:
I am against this patch. The tenant user can see
Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-4836:
---
Summary: Jackrabbit (jcr) doesn't work nice with multi-tenancy
aspect of OFBiz
Key: OFBIZ-4836
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4836
Project: OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259496#comment-13259496
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-4130:
-
Hans,
I believe you do not fully understand
Hi all,
Can you please elaborate on how to use the entities 'Component' and
'TenantComponent'?
Regards,
Pierre
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
This is a reasonable compromise.
My suggestion for the URL regarding the latest stable release:
http(s)://demo.ofbiz.apache.org
or:
http(s)://demo-ofbiz.apache.org
This will not change, it was already difficult to get the names from ASF/infra, sot it
These are the components belonging to a specific tenant only. When the
tenant data is loaded it will only load data from these components in
hot-deploy and not other components in hot-deploy.
So security of the other components is not loaded so other tenants will
not have access.
Regards,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259540#comment-13259540
]
Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-4130:
doesn't this patch effect both default or
Only for non-default delegators (read delegators for tenants). As you know
each tenant gets his own delegator. However, current setup of OFBiz doesn't
have tenant users look at the data in the tenant delegator for the tables
mentioned, but in the main delegator.
And that is why each tenant user
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259549#comment-13259549
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-4130:
-
Keeping it together. I accidentally replied
Keeping it together for all developers in the community to read. I
accidentally replied Hans directly in stead of through the ML:
Pierre Smits
13:38 (36 minuten geleden)
aan Hans
Thanks Hans,
If I understand you correctly,
1. I have to register all components there are
2. and that if I
Hans, all,
My apologies, but telegramme-style communication is not my forté.
Re: webtools is a developer option.
I can't agree on webtools being just a developers option. In a production
environment you wouldn't want developers to access anything part of that
setup, as it might disrupt
By the way, this is really a user list discussion. Generally if your question
is along the lines of How do I use... or What is the purpose of... then it
probably belongs on the user list.
Regards
Scott
On 24/04/2012, at 12:59 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hans, all,
My apologies, but
What do you think? In order to run most of the tests successfully you need to
run load-data that already depends on build...
Here is the code change I would like to commit:
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 1328357)
+1
In my CI setup for automated OFBiz testing the system, after having checked
out the latest from trunk automatically, each individual test suite
triggered has to rebuild. Which only takes a minute or so. But for all
executed test runs together it adds up to about 15 mins.
So, each minute saved
I agree. My apologies for not having it started there.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 23 april 2012 15:07 schreef Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com het
volgende:
By the way, this is really a user list discussion. Generally if your
question is along the lines of How do I use... or What is the
Adrian,
the issue you are experiencing is interesting and I had a look at it; I was
only able to recreate the same failures by changing the timeouts in
UtilCacheTests.java at line 302 and 308; instead of:
cache.setExpireTime(100); // line 302
Thread.sleep(200); // line 308
I set:
The tests failed intermittently in the OFBiz buildbot (back when it was
running). They always fail on my development machine.
I tried experimenting with the sleep timing and I also replaced the
Thread.sleep call with a safer version, but the tests still failed.
-Adrian
On 4/23/2012 2:40 PM,
Gil Portenseigne created OFBIZ-4837:
---
Summary: Separator Error in data file tools
Key: OFBIZ-4837
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4837
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gil Portenseigne updated OFBIZ-4837:
Remaining Estimate: 0.5h (was: 5h)
Original Estimate: 0.5h (was: 5h)
Separator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gil Portenseigne updated OFBIZ-4837:
Attachment: result.xml
dataSample.csv
dataDefinition.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gil Portenseigne updated OFBIZ-4837:
Attachment: OFBIZ-4837.patch
The patch
Separator Error in data file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259665#comment-13259665
]
Gil Portenseigne commented on OFBIZ-4837:
-
I didn't comment the code :
I add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259685#comment-13259685
]
Daniel Riquelme commented on OFBIZ-4669:
I guess it's because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gil Portenseigne updated OFBIZ-4837:
Attachment: OFBIZ-4837_2.patch
Second version of patch taking care of specific case, when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Burns updated OFBIZ-4801:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4801 SFA Duplicate Line In Form.patch
Add Support for Dependent Country State
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Burns reopened OFBIZ-4801:
--
Duplicate line for stateProvinceGeoId in AccountForms.xml
Add Support for Dependent
Tom Burns created OFBIZ-4838:
Summary: Party Manager Party StatusId Update Fails
Key: OFBIZ-4838
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4838
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
+1
Jacques
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
+1
In my CI setup for automated OFBiz testing the system, after having checked
out the latest from trunk automatically, each individual test suite
triggered has to rebuild. Which only takes a minute or so. But for all
executed test runs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4801.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Tom,
Fixed at revision 1329332.
Add Support for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-4130:
Fix Version/s: Release 11.04.01
Tenant super user (tenant admin) can view all database
+1
Sascha
Am 23.04.2012 um 17:56 schrieb Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com:
+1
Jacques
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
+1
In my CI setup for automated OFBiz testing the system, after having checked
out the latest from trunk automatically, each individual test
+1
On Apr 23, 2012 3:22 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
What do you think? In order to run most of the tests successfully you need
to run load-data that already depends on build...
Here is the code change I would like to commit:
Index: build.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13259955#comment-13259955
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4837:
---
Hi Gil,
there is no need to rename
49 matches
Mail list logo
