[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13701254#comment-13701254
]
Nandani Aggarwal commented on OFBIZ-4291:
-
Hello ,
Thanks for reply.
A promotion
The screens used to be consistent until some committers decided to start
wrapping all screens in screenlets.
As we said, you are copying the wrong layout. If you want consistency,
then copy the right layout.
-Adrian
On 7/6/2013 1:16 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Adrian, Scott,
there is not a sing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker updated OFBIZ-5256:
---
Description:
I need help from our framework experts.
I want to copy invoices from an ofbiz system to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker updated OFBIZ-5256:
---
Attachment: value.diff
the patch implementing this Jira
> allow a value in the view
Hans Bakker created OFBIZ-5256:
--
Summary: allow a value in the view relation definition
Key: OFBIZ-5256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5256
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Before you jump in again: I stand corrected: only the fixed asset
function is using it, pretty inconsistent if you look to the rest of
accounting.
Regards,
Hans
On 07/06/2013 07:16 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Adrian, Scott,
there is not a single screen that I am aware of in accounting, which
is
Adrian, Scott,
there is not a single screen that I am aware of in accounting, which is
following this so called standard. (where is that documented anyway?)
In my view, consistency is much more important, so i followed the
current pattern used in accounting.
Regards,
Hans
On 07/06/2013 01:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13701128#comment-13701128
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4291:
Nandani,
It's only about promo codes rem
If you want to change the layout best practices, then that is fine - but
we need to discuss it first.
The current best practices were agreed upon the last time we had this
discussion. If you would like to propose something else, then go ahead.
When we have a consensus, then we can update the b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13701053#comment-13701053
]
Nandani Aggarwal commented on OFBIZ-4291:
-
Hello Ankit,
I tried your patch to una
Yes I wondered about that also, but, from his assertion, thought Deepak checked
all others
Deepak?
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
> That doesn't answer my question. Why are only two requests being
> changed? What makes those two requests the exception to all other
> requests that include an eve
Pretty is irrelevant Hans, it's about document structure. It's pointless
wrapping everything in a screenlet or we may as well not even have the widget
in the first place and have it embedded in the decorator instead. Using bad
layouts as a justification for more of them is silly.
Regards
Scot
I found these reported request :)
All the request with event attribute will be render in same way and create
hidden form.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
On Jul 5, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> That doesn't answer my question. Why are only two requests being changed?
> What makes
I am sorry Adrian, this is not a pretty screen,
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/EditFixedAsset
i prefer the screen with a screenlet as really many, many others. I
would like to change your screen too :-)
Regards,
Hans
On 07/05/2013 06:49 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Making screens cons
Making screens consistent is a good idea, but please make them
consistent with GOOD layouts, not with BAD layouts. Please follow the
best practices.
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/EditFixedAsset
-Adrian
On 7/5/2013 12:46 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
to make the screen layout consistent
to make the screen layout consistent to:
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/ListCompanies
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/globalGLSettings
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/editInvoiceItemType
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/editPaymentMethodType
https://localhos
On 7/5/2013 12:19 PM, Deepak Dixit wrote:
Hi Adrian,
These controller request has "event", and if an request event attribute is not
null then WidgetWorker.determineAutoLinkType() return hidden-form as link type and its
create an empty form for the same.
WidgetWorker method convert hyper links
That doesn't answer my question. Why are only two requests being
changed? What makes those two requests the exception to all other
requests that include an event?
-Adrian
On 7/5/2013 12:19 PM, Deepak Dixit wrote:
Hi Adrian,
These controller request has "event", and if an request event attrib
Please don't do this. Screenlets are used to divide sections of a screen
in a multi-purpose screen. This screen appears to have a single purpose.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/User+Interface+Layout+Best+Practices
-Adrian
On 7/5/2013 9:04 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
Au
Hi Adrian,
These controller request has "event", and if an request event attribute is not
null then WidgetWorker.determineAutoLinkType() return hidden-form as link type
and its create an empty form for the same.
WidgetWorker method convert hyper links to hidden for for service type of event
as
This doesn't make sense. Why are those two menu items exceptions to the
rule?
-Adrian
On 7/5/2013 7:57 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Fri Jul 5 06:57:03 2013
New Revision: 1499918
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1499918
Log:
A patch from Deepak Dixit for "Application Menu it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13700561#comment-13700561
]
Petr Pytelka commented on OFBIZ-5202:
-
It sounds as a good solution. Thak you for your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13700558#comment-13700558
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5202:
Thanks Petr,
Your last statement is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13700545#comment-13700545
]
Petr Pytelka commented on OFBIZ-5202:
-
One more addition:
If I start Ofbiz with demo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13700514#comment-13700514
]
Petr Pytelka commented on OFBIZ-5202:
-
Hello,
I've tried to investigate what is the pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Petr Pytelka updated OFBIZ-5202:
Attachment: UploadFail-12.04.patch
Details in comment
> upload content at party pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13700510#comment-13700510
]
Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-4913:
-
Thanks Jacques.
--
Deepak Dixit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13700507#comment-13700507
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5202:
I guess it's a conflict for this specific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13700489#comment-13700489
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4913:
Thanks Deepak,
Your trunked patch is in
29 matches
Mail list logo