> On 15 Oct 2015, at 07:58, Adrian Crum
> wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that much of David's code in OFBiz has been rewritten. So yes,
> we CAN do a better job than him.
I think there’s a name for this logical fallacy…
> Also keep in mind that Moqui duplicates some of the problems I listed - so b
> On 15 Oct 2015, at 18:48, Scott Gray wrote:
>
> By the way, I'm surprised I haven't seen any efforts within the Moqui
> community to rewrite any of the OFBiz apps. I don't have any ideas as to
> why that hasn't happened, but I'm curious about it. Surely it would be
> easier for the Moqui com
I don't think this community is large enough to attempt to rewrite all of
our applications to suit Moqui while at the same time still supporting them
under the existing framework. That may well be the case for a homegrown
framework rewrite as well depending on how the applications would be
affecte
+1
-邮件原件-
发件人: Adrian Crum [mailto:adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com]
发送时间: 2015年10月15日 21:59
收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
主题: Re: Why A Framework Rewrite Is Necessary
Keep in mind that much of David's code in OFBiz has been rewritten. So
yes, we CAN do a better job than him. Also keep in
Well said: +1
On 15/10/15 22:13, Al Byers wrote:
Fair enough, Adrian, but is this a widely held position on OFBiz that as a
group you could produce a product that is so much better than Moqui that it
would be worth the time and risk (the risk of burning cycles that you will
never get back only t
Heidi Dehaes created OFBIZ-6677:
---
Summary: Show out of stock products in STORE --- CATALOG Manager
doesn't work
Key: OFBIZ-6677
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6677
Project: OFBiz
Heidi Dehaes created OFBIZ-6676:
---
Summary: Pagination in ecommerce does not work
Key: OFBIZ-6676
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6676
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
C
Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-6675:
---
Summary: EntityUtilityProperties should have getProperties function
Key: OFBIZ-6675
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6675
Project: OFBiz
Issue
Fair enough, Adrian, but is this a widely held position on OFBiz that as a
group you could produce a product that is so much better than Moqui that it
would be worth the time and risk (the risk of burning cycles that you will
never get back only to have the venture never succeed.) Have all the peop
Keep in mind that much of David's code in OFBiz has been rewritten. So
yes, we CAN do a better job than him. Also keep in mind that Moqui
duplicates some of the problems I listed - so by using Moqui, we keep
the same problems instead of fixing them. On the other hand, it is
David's responsibili
I was waiting for someone to bring this up. David Jones created Moqui with
the same end in mind that the rewrite is meant to accomplish. Do you think
that you will do a better job than him? Even if you could, would it be so
much better that it warrants the effort that it would take?
Is this a poli
Forgot to add, even if Java 9 will not be available before a year, it would be good to think about what the Jigsaw project (part of Java 9) could
bring to such a endeavour in term of modularisation and dependency...
Jacques
Le 15/10/2015 11:51, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I'm in the same mood th
Why not skip this step, using moqui which is already up and running and
then as Adrian states as a next step: applications could be pulled down
and adapted to it.
Hans
On 15/10/15 16:51, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I'm in the same mood than Paul and Scott. So a sub-project could
indeed be a solut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14958610#comment-14958610
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-6674 at 10/15/15 10:20 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14958664#comment-14958664
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6674:
Thanks to Gil who saw it on the OFBiz fre
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch12 while
building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch12/builds/43
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchSchedul
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch13 while
building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch13/builds/39
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchSchedul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14958610#comment-14958610
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-6674 at 10/15/15 10:06 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6674:
---
Fix Version/s: 13.07.03
12.04.06
This follows OFBIZ-5416, so I have bacport
I'm in the same mood than Paul and Scott. So a sub-project could indeed be a
solution.
Jacques
Le 15/10/2015 03:11, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I agree that a sub-project would be nice to have. Once the new framework is up
and running, applications could be pulled down and adapted to it.
Adrian Cr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-6674.
---
> In addToCart() method, reset shipment method information in cart only if
> shipping applies on product
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arun Patidar resolved OFBIZ-6674.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 14.12
Upcoming Branch
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arun Patidar updated OFBIZ-6674:
Attachment: OFBIZ-6674.patch
Attached is the patch for fixing this issue.
> In addToCart() method,
Arun Patidar created OFBIZ-6674:
---
Summary: In addToCart() method, reset shipment method information
in cart only if shipping applies on product
Key: OFBIZ-6674
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6674
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-6236:
---
Assignee: Arun Patidar
> Integration of OFBiz and Magento ecommerce for providing Order Manag
It's done at OFBIZ-6669 already
Jacques
Le 15/10/2015 09:58, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Jacques,
Please do not forget to create a jira issue for this, so that it will pop
up in release notes.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Thu, Oct 15
Jacques,
Please do not forget to create a jira issue for this, so that it will pop
up in release notes.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jaco
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/167
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
28 matches
Mail list logo
