Hi Devs,
I am curious about some protected data members of ShoppingCartItem and
ShoppingCart class.
ShoppingCartItem contains:
*private Map orderItemAttributes = null;private Map attributes = null;*
While ShoppingCart have:
*private Map
Jacopo summarized this very nicely.
So yeah I would say the code quality of code in this feature is good and
can go to the code base, but let's stay open to the idea of refactoring
which may affect it in the future. I am already doing some low level work
in that area BTW
Cheers,
Taher Alkhateeb
Hi Jacopo,
Thank you for looking into the matter.
Was just looking at loading standard web application due to one use-case,
but the issue of deploying OFBiz WAR was bought up.
Just to reiterate that allowing standard web application now should not impede
efforts towards building OFBiz WAR
Hi James,
thanks for your design proposal and implementation: I have reviewed your
patch in Jira and it looks good to me.
As mentioned by Taher, in the future we may try to move away from the OFBiz
container driven startup process in order to make OFBiz more easily
deployable in an application
Hi Michael,
Okay, I didn't look at that page. Yes, it should be sufficient. Thanks.
Sincerely,
James
On 2017-05-08 16:54 (+0800), Michael Brohl wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> thanks for your suggestion. That's exactly what I did in [1], which pops
> up a warning.
>
>
Hi James,
thanks for your suggestion. That's exactly what I did in [1], which pops
up a warning.
Don't you think it is sufficient?
Best regards,
Michael
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Mini+Language+-+minilang+-+simple-method+-+Reference
Am 08.05.17 um 05:34
Yep: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/search/?q=ClientAbortException
Jacques
Le 07/05/2017 à 22:43, Nicola Mazzoni a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I'd like to ask you about an issue regarding
ecommerce app
.
We are monitoring our OFBiz ecommerce application with NewRelic and we
noticed that there are