Hi Michael
On 05/07/2017 17:56, Michael Brohl wrote:
Hi Gil,
we have similar challenges and modified OFBiz to deal with it easily.
We offered to contribute this long time ago (2008) but it was decided
against [1]. It was suggested to use patches instead but I think it's
too complicated to
Hi Taher
inline
On 05/07/2017 18:41, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
I faced something similar in the past (Not related to OFBiz). Many
systems require different paths of configuration depending on
different deployment scenarios.
There are multiple types of configurations I can think of including:
-
Hi James,
inline
On 06/07/2017 12:12, James Yong wrote:
Hi Gil,
Some afterthought questions with the proposed change:
1) Can it support multiple OFBiz instances on the same server?
Using different shell process to launch the multiple OFBiz instances, i
think that it's possible to set
Le 04/07/2017 à 17:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I'd also let Angular out of the picture. Some prefer React (initially from FB) and I wonder what those who have used Angular 1 think about Angular
2! I also remember another Google "attempt": GWT. Are there still people using it with OFBiz? I
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework
while building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework/builds/251
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The
Hi Gil,
Some afterthought questions with the proposed change:
1) Can it support multiple OFBiz instances on the same server?
2) Can we store encrypted values for some of the environment variables like
database credentials?
Regards,
James Yong
On 2017-07-06 16:28 (+0800), "James
Hi Gil and all,
Faced the same issues before.
I had different environments like SIT, UAT and PROD requiring different
settings.
There was also specific requirements to remove the source folders and zip the
final files for deployment.
So I created a folder which has subfolders named after
