Re: OFBiz & gradlew-wrapper.jar

Hi, It's almost 7 months now and nothing happened at LEGAL-288 So I think we should follow the way Jacopo suggested, and I reported below, before we do the next release Thanks Jacques Le 07/05/2017 à 11:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : I suggest we wait for the result of LEGAL-288 before

Re: [PROPOSAL] Extend returnId and shipmentId in FinAccountTrans entity

Thanks, Paul and everyone for the detailed description. -- Thanks and Regards, *Suraj Khurana* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Vaibhav Jain

Re: Java Applets

Le 21/11/2017 à 10:23, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : I'm in favor of removing any Java Applets. It was an idea born dead. +1 Nicolas

Implement groovy for integration test

Hello guys, At the beginning I would ask you some help to implement the groovy test [1] in testtools but finally I found how do that. But I'm sure this first patch [2] can be improve, so if this subject alert you mind, don't hesitate to review and critic it :) The second step on this

Re: Initial inventory import in OFBiz

Hello Vaibhav, Initial inventory import using a shipment looks good to me. What will be the case when you will mark shipment received and the system will generate purchase invoice for it? Thia is possible that we are not purchasing received inventory during system setup, that was already paid

Re: [PROPOSAL] Extend returnId and shipmentId in FinAccountTrans entity

Hello all, Thank you very much to all of you for sharing this valuable information. As we can conclude this conversation here. 1. Payment entity already has a field finAccountTransId. So there is no need of paymentId in the FinAccountTrans entity. 2. A financial account transaction may