Nice, the end of the years will be hardest :)
Nicolas
Le 29/11/2017 à 11:06, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Ok, thanks for all the feedback guys!
Let's plan to create the branches before the end of the year.
Jacopo
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Taher Alkhateeb
wrote:
I think Rishi makes a
Should we not discuss (and hopefully do) this before the next release?
Jacques
Le 23/11/2017 à 15:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Ha something I missed: we don't bundle the tools with the releases.
Should that be an issue? I guess not. Because anyway if one wants to build OFBiz one needs an Int
If an service implements and do checks for the permissions then it must
have the auth set as true. If any occurrences found then it should be by
mistake and service definition should be fix to match.
So I think the behavior we have is correct, whenever we want to check the
permission it should ha
Ok, thanks for all the feedback guys!
Let's plan to create the branches before the end of the year.
Jacopo
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
> I think Rishi makes a good point. OFBIZ-9501 is a big task but it
> would be nice to create the release after the majority of da
Le 29/11/2017 à 07:57, Michael Brohl a écrit :
-1 for storing the version in .properties.
+1
+1 for using a VERSION or RELEASE file in the root folder to store this
information.
It's easily accessible, you cannot overlook it and the content can be read by any functionality. It can also be au
auth="false" and a permission service are completely incompatible
scenarios. In what situation could you possibly have no userLogin and
successfully run a permission service?
What would you expect to happen instead of the current behavior?
Regards
Scott
On 3 November 2017 at 17:35, Suraj Khuran