Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

+1 Thanks & Regards, Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Aditya Sharma < aditya.sha...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 > > Thanks and Regards, > > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer > HotWax Commerce

Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

+1 Thanks and Regards, *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Commerce by HotWax Systems On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Swapnil Mane <

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

Hi All, Can we commit the code for Tomcat SSO (OFBIZ-10047) but switch the feature off? Once the Cluster SSO is ready, we can backport to the 17.xx branch with Tomcat SSO turned on. Regards, James On 2017-12-19 20:43, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Now that we seems

Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

+1 - Best Regards, Swapnil M Mane On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > we have published our last release mostly 6 months ago and since then we > have merged several bug fixes to our 16.11 branch: I think it is time to >

Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

+1 Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Taher Alkhateeb < slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Dec 20, 2017 7:17 AM, "Ashish Vijaywargiya" < > ashish.vijaywarg...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -- > > Kind

Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

+1 On Dec 20, 2017 7:17 AM, "Ashish Vijaywargiya" < ashish.vijaywarg...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 > > -- > Kind Regards > Ashish Vijaywargiya > HotWax Systems - est. 1997 > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >

Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

+1 -- Kind Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya HotWax Systems - est. 1997 On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > we have published our last release mostly 6 months ago and since then we > have

Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

+1 Thanks, Michael Am 19.12.17 um 16:43 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: Hi all, we have published our last release mostly 6 months ago and since then we have merged several bug fixes to our 16.11 branch: I think it is time to publish a new one! If there are no objections I am going to prepare

Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

Hi all, we have published our last release mostly 6 months ago and since then we have merged several bug fixes to our 16.11 branch: I think it is time to publish a new one! If there are no objections I am going to prepare the release files in the next few days and then we will start the release

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

As per the discussion on http://markmail.org/message/4mrffmp5j2mujv3w and OFBIZ-9902. We have prepared markdown file with the data model changes from OFBiz R9 to 17. It will help users/developers to identify data model changes that come with the

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

+1 Jacques Le 19/12/2017 à 11:53, Deepak Dixit a écrit : +1 I would like to backport ecommerce UX improvement work and remaining jquery upgrade work. Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Nicolas Malin

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

Now that we seems to agree about discussing each case, what about mine? :) Jacques Le 19/12/2017 à 11:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : My preference is to create the branch now and discuss on a case by case the backporting of any additional feature. Jacopo On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM,

[DISCUSSION] Formatting in OFBiz OOTB

Hi, Following https://s.apache.org/9pTo (OFBIZ-9877) and http://markmail.org/message/2bsp2fsbrdbd6dlb here is a discussion about Formatting in OFBiz OOTB. Note we had already discussions in the past and these should be used as references in this discussion

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

+1 I would like to backport ecommerce UX improvement work and remaining jquery upgrade work. Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote: > sound good +1 > > > > Le 19/12/2017 à 11:31,

Re: Bootstrap 4 vs. 3, was: svn commit: r1818637 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/ecommerce/template/customer: MessageDetail.ftl MessageList.ftl NewMsg.ftl

Thanks Michael for reviewing Thanks Mayank for clarifications Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Michael Brohl wrote: > Thanks Mayank, > > for the clarification. I mixed the ecommerce component with

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

sound good +1 Le 19/12/2017 à 11:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : My preference is to create the branch now and discuss on a case by case the backporting of any additional feature. Jacopo On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Le 18/12/2017 à

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

+1 Regards, Michael Am 19.12.17 um 11:31 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: My preference is to create the branch now and discuss on a case by case the backporting of any additional feature. Jacopo On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Le

Re: Java Applets

Thanks Guys, Done at revision: 1818646  for OFBIZ-10094 Jacques Le 22/11/2017 à 14:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit : Le 21/11/2017 à 10:23, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : I'm in favor of removing any Java Applets. It was an idea born dead. +1 Nicolas

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

+1 On Dec 19, 2017 1:31 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: My preference is to create the branch now and discuss on a case by case the backporting of any additional feature. Jacopo On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux <

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

My preference is to create the branch now and discuss on a case by case the backporting of any additional feature. Jacopo On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Le 18/12/2017 à 18:02, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at

Re: Bootstrap 4 vs. 3, was: svn commit: r1818637 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/ecommerce/template/customer: MessageDetail.ftl MessageList.ftl NewMsg.ftl

Thanks Mayank, for the clarification. I mixed the ecommerce component with the OFBiz applications. I have no objections against Bootstrap 4 support in the ecommerce component. Thanks for your valuable work, Regards, Michael Am 19.12.17 um 09:54 schrieb Mayank Lambhate: Hello Michael,

Re: Mentoring program

Done Jacques Le 20/11/2017 à 09:34, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, I think adding a short sentence and a link to     https://community.apache.org/mentoringprogramme.html in our Apache OFBiz Contributors page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Apache+OFBiz+Contributors would

Re: Bootstrap 4 vs. 3, was: svn commit: r1818637 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/ecommerce/template/customer: MessageDetail.ftl MessageList.ftl NewMsg.ftl

Hello Michael, We are currently integrating Bootstrap 4 only for ecommerce component. Previously, there was no Bootstrap support, so we thought of going with the latest Bootstrap 4 rollout. I understand your concern about Bootstrap 4 being in a beta version, but It has already 6 alpha version

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

Le 18/12/2017 à 18:02, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: There are 3 tasks that I'd like to be completed/committed before we create the R17 branch (or maybe a R18 one) 1. Tomcat SSO: OFBIZ-10047 2. Upgrade

Bootstrap 4 vs. 3, was: svn commit: r1818637 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/ecommerce/template/customer: MessageDetail.ftl MessageList.ftl NewMsg.ftl

Hi Deepak, do we really want to make a switch to Bootsrap 4 now?? When I see it right, it is still in beta and it breaks existing Bootstrap 3 based UI because of some changes which are not backwards compatible. I think we should make a decision about this move. I'd propose to wait for the