Re: Upgrade to latest Gradle version 4.6?

Hi Michael, I see no problem in upgrading, we would however face a warning everytime we run a server task which I described in [1]. I have been thinking a lot of a solution and I think I am close to getting something done. So I would suggest yeah go for it and I will try to accelerate a solution

Upgrade to latest Gradle version 4.6?

Hi all, I wanted to check if the current OFBiz version is running under the latest early access version of Oracle JDK 10 and what it takes to make it work. The current Gradle version we use is not able to detect the Java version correctly and must be updated for it. I changed the

Re: svn commit: r1825436 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/security/ofbiz-component.xml

Ah so you did, sorry! I just picked a random commit from my inbox to review without looking at the subsequent ones. Regards Scott On 1 March 2018 at 10:57, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > Hi Scott, yeah I reverted this commit. > > I realized that the reason for the crash

Re: svn commit: r1825436 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/security/ofbiz-component.xml

Hi Scott, yeah I reverted this commit. I realized that the reason for the crash is actually the order of writing the readers in the command line. There are still some issues in other areas of loading, so I need to study it a bit further. On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:46 AM, Scott Gray

Re: svn commit: r1825436 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/security/ofbiz-component.xml

Hi Taher, I'm not sure I understand or if something has changed in the last few years but seed-initial should always expect to be loaded after seed data so it shouldn't be a problem for seed-initial to depend on seed data. You would never just load seed-initial into an empty database. Regards

Re: orderSkipInvoice, complete an order without generating an invoice

Nicolas, Thank you for the detailed information. I agree on setting the trigger value on on store level so that each store may behaves as per business need, in case of multiple stores. Just one question here, orderHeader will also have the same field or it is intended to override some default