Not only is this commit unnecessary, but also breaks one of the best
features in Object Oriented Programming -- polymorphism -- for no value
that I can see anywhere at all.
Also by saying we depend fully on Tomcat and we should write code that
further enforces that idea instead of making our archi
On 22 March 2018 at 16:27, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Though it's not the official page, you might want to change
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Apache+
> OFBiz+PMC+Members+and+Committers
Yes, a good idea. I've done that now.
Thanks Jacques.
--
Coherent Software Australi
As per
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Using+XMLRPC+with+Flex+client
In OFBiz the limitations are simple types. GenericValue object will
> convert to Maps and be supported as Structs in XMLRPC, besides that
> you should limit your parameters to simple types (string, double,
> in
Something else must be wrong Jacques, I can't understand what you're saying
in the ticket description or in your reply above but I do know the
following:
OFBiz is perfectly capable of knowing that
org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade
implements the javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest and i
Hi ,
I had been using XMLRPC regularly for invoking OFBiz functions and getting
results.
However with below function calculateProductPrice I am facing problem in
passing the
"product" param . I am getting the error below:
Service: calculateProductPrice faultString:Type check failed for field
[ca
Michael,
I commited
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/webapp/control/ContextFilter.java?r1=1813679&r2=1813678&pathrev=1813679
Where I added a wrapper. Then for "Tomcat SSO" (OFBIZ-10047) James committed
http://svn.apache.
Done in r1827510
Michael
Am 22.03.18 um 10:46 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Le 22/03/2018 à 10:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
So all should be OK after that.
Michael,
For educational purpose, I still let you complete
ofbiz/tools/rat-excludes.txt
Thanks
Jacques
smime.p7s
Description: S/M
Mmhhh, Jacques,
I think this is problematic because it ties a special implementation for
Tomcat to the service. I didn't see this anywhere else.
The issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10304) is a bit
unclear and I don't get the purpose of this change.
Can you please explain
Le 22/03/2018 à 10:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
So all should be OK after that.
Michael,
For educational purpose, I still let you complete ofbiz/tools/rat-excludes.txt
Thanks
Jacques
Yikes, forgot to update in Eclipse so there was actually nothing missing after
Gil's commit. I'll force the damned BUildBot !
Jacques
Le 22/03/2018 à 10:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Michael ,
I fixed the framework with r1827457
https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFramework and it was
I guess you mean replace by .adoc files?
Jacques
Le 22/03/2018 à 10:32, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Just a note to all the documentation team, I think we should probably
delete most README files anyway. The manual should be comprehensive
and incorporate whatever is documented in these README fi
Just a note to all the documentation team, I think we should probably
delete most README files anyway. The manual should be comprehensive
and incorporate whatever is documented in these README files
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:54 AM, wrote:
> Author: pgil
> Date: Thu Mar 22 08:54:00 2018
> New Re
Michael ,
I fixed the framework with r1827457
https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFramework and it was the reason why
Buildbot did not trigger RAT.
It only triggers on successful trunk framework commits:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkRat
Gill just improved r1827457 an
You'r right, thanks Gil
Jacques
Le 22/03/2018 à 08:48, gil portenseigne a écrit :
Indeed, thanks Jacques for the fix.
I'll just complete it renaming the zipName to README.adoc.zip :), not a big
deal but for consistency it's better.
Gil
On 22/03/2018 06:30, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Autho
Indeed, thanks Jacques for the fix.
I'll just complete it renaming the zipName to README.adoc.zip :), not a
big deal but for consistency it's better.
Gil
On 22/03/2018 06:30, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Thu Mar 22 05:30:39 2018
New Revision: 1827457
URL: http://svn.apac
15 matches
Mail list logo