Re: svn commit: r1846098 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/branches/release17.12: ./ applications/product/minilang/product/store/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/widget/catalog/

2018-11-08 Thread Deepak Dixit
Thanks Jacques, Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Deepak, > > Yes I also think it's the right solution, just that it was easier in the > meantime > > Jacques > > > > Le 09/11/2018 à 07:01, Deepak Dixit a

Re: svn commit: r1846098 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/branches/release17.12: ./ applications/product/minilang/product/store/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/widget/catalog/

2018-11-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Deepak, Yes I also think it's the right solution, just that it was easier in the meantime Jacques Le 09/11/2018 à 07:01, Deepak Dixit a écrit : I think instead of changing visualThemeId we can modify the common-theme work that is causing the issue. Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit On

Re: svn commit: r1846098 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/branches/release17.12: ./ applications/product/minilang/product/store/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/widget/catalog/

2018-11-08 Thread Deepak Dixit
I think instead of changing visualThemeId we can modify the common-theme work that is causing the issue. Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM, wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Thu Nov 8 07:19:20 2018 > New Revision: 1846098 > > URL:

Re: Google reCAPTCHA in E-Commerce

2018-11-08 Thread Deepak Nigam
Thanks, Richard & Rishi. Yes, we can make it configurable at the store level. Here is the Jira ticket for further discussions and implementation. On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 6:24 PM Rishi Solanki wrote: > Big +1 for adding this feature with

Re: svn commit: r1846159 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/tools: ./ wiki-files/ wiki-files/birt/

2018-11-08 Thread Mathieu Lirzin
Hello Jacques, Jacques Le Roux writes: > Duplicating documentation in wiki is not a good ideas as soon as the > Asciidoc documentation exists in a branch. > > Else you end with multi versions to handle in wiki and that's a no good. I strongly agree. > So I'll remove them when an Asciidoc

Re: svn commit: r1846159 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/tools: ./ wiki-files/ wiki-files/birt/

2018-11-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
OK, I'm answering to myself. Duplicating documentation in wiki is not a good ideas as soon as the Asciidoc documentation exists in a branch. Else you end with multi versions to handle in wiki and that's a no good. So I'll remove them when an Asciidoc documentation exists. Jacques Le

Re: svn commit: r1845933 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/base/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/base/util/GroovyUtil.java

2018-11-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Pierre, Mathieu, I did not notice and I have no ideas why it's like that. We need to look at the history to see if there is a reason. Jacques Le 08/11/2018 à 18:10, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : Hello Pierre, Pierre Smits writes: You're referencing a groovy script that is not located in

Re: svn commit: r1846159 [1/2] - in /ofbiz/tools: ./ wiki-files/ wiki-files/birt/

2018-11-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, I was wondering, now that we have the embedded documentation, is it still worth to duplicate in Wiki? Thanks Jacques Le 08/11/2018 à 16:17, jler...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jleroux Date: Thu Nov 8 15:17:25 2018 New Revision: 1846159 URL:

Re: svn commit: r1845933 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/base/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/base/util/GroovyUtil.java

2018-11-08 Thread Mathieu Lirzin
Hello Pierre, Pierre Smits writes: > You're referencing a groovy script that is not located in the agreed > folder, which is the 'groovyScript' folder. Is there a reason why the > referenced file is in the config folder? According to the developper documentation, ‘groovyScripts’ is the

Re: svn commit: r1845933 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/base/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/base/util/GroovyUtil.java

2018-11-08 Thread Pierre Smits
Hi Jacques, You're referencing a groovy script that is not located in the agreed folder, which is the 'groovyScript' folder. Is there a reason why the referenced file is in the config folder? Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache