Re: Welcome to Deepak Nigam as new committer!

2019-06-12 Thread Deepak Dixit
Welcome, Abroad Deepak Nigam!! Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit ofbiz.apache.org On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:20 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak to become a new committer and we are > pleased to announce that he has accepted. > >

Re: Welcome to Pawan Verma as new committer!

2019-06-12 Thread Deepak Dixit
Many Many Congratulations Pawan!!! Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit ofbiz.apache.org On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:20 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Pawan to become a new committer and we are > pleased to announce that he has accepted. > >

Welcome to Pawan Verma as new committer!

2019-06-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
The OFBiz PMC has invited Pawan to become a new committer and we are pleasedĀ  to announce that he has accepted. Pawan is part of the community for 2 years and has being quite active and proficient, notably these last times with several smart propositions. He also helps a lot of Jiras and

Welcome to Deepak Nigam as new committer!

2019-06-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak to become a new committer and we are pleasedĀ  to announce that he has accepted. DeepakĀ  is part of the community since January 2016 and has proved to be committed since. He notably made a great work for OFBIZ-10518 "Inventory (Supply) Allocation Planning "

Reply-to address missing for dev and user mailing list

2019-06-12 Thread Aditya Sharma
Hi team, It seems reply-to address configuration is missing for some emails from dev and user mailing list (for reference see *Removing support for global "ofbiz-containers.xml"*) while I can still find it on the notifications mailing list. Anyone having any idea about it? Thanks and regards,

Re: Removing support for global "ofbiz-containers.xml"

2019-06-12 Thread Michael Brohl
Hi Mathieu, thanks for your proposal. Just a few questions to get the whole picture: 1. do we really have a complexity problem here? The removed code seems not too complicated or long. 2. what do we lose with the removal? I see one can not only configure the ComponentContainer class but