Hello Jacques,
Jacques Le Roux writes:
> You were the most visible proponents of this. After 5 days w/o
> exchanges should we consider the idea is abandoned or should we start
> a vote?
>
> Without answers I'll consider the idea abandoned, which is a pity IMO.
The idea is not abandonned yet,
I have attached necessary details in JIRA. Please review and let me know
if I need to provide more details.
Best Regards,
Girish
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:20 AM Akash Jain
wrote:
> Hi Girish,
>
> It's a nice feature. Please let me know if you need any help.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> --
>
Thanks James,
Maybe better to continue there indeed, less confusion, just focused on what's
important.
Jacques
Le 29/01/2020 à 16:52, James Yong a écrit :
Added my comments on the technical aspects of the proposal at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11296
On 2020/01/29 08:26:00,
Added my comments on the technical aspects of the proposal at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11296
On 2020/01/29 08:26:00, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Mathieu, Samuel,
>
> You were the most visible proponents of this. After 5 days w/o exchanges
> should we consider the idea is
Thank you very much Pierre for this clarification,
It remembers me when the checkbox for the same in Jira was removed.
Jacques
Le 29/01/2020 à 10:59, Pierre Smits a écrit :
According to the ASF there is no legal issue with the status of the
contribution provided by a contributor without an
According to the ASF there is no legal issue with the status of the
contribution provided by a contributor without an ICLA.
In the license [1] it is stated that:
Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally
submitted for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall
Hello
On 29/01/2020 07:58, Michael Brohl wrote:
>
> Not sure if we necessarily have to deprecate the patch based
> contributions. It could be a simpler way for contributors to provide a
> change, especially if they are not developers and/or familiar with the
> pull request mechanisms. Maybe the
Hi Pierre,
I don't want to put more burden on the committer size either. From my experience, if we want to continue to use our commit template using PR merge is
not an option.
Jacques
Le 29/01/2020 à 09:05, Pierre Smits a écrit :
I agree with Micheal here that the project should not impose
Le 29/01/2020 à 08:02, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
inline...
Am 28.01.20 um 19:05 schrieb jler...@apache.org:
This was an awkward experience, I don't know if i could have done it better,
ideas, advices?
Maybe advising contributors to use our template in commit comments used by
Hi Mathieu,
Inline...
Le 28/01/2020 à 20:31, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
"jler...@apache.org" writes:
But I got a
fast-forward issue and after trying several pull and push tricks I
understood I'll never pass over this issue:
"[remote rejected] trunk -> trunk
Hi Mathieu, Samuel,
You were the most visible proponents of this. After 5 days w/o exchanges should
we consider the idea is abandoned or should we start a vote?
Without answers I'll consider the idea abandoned, which is a pity IMO.
Thanks
Jacques
Le 24/01/2020 à 14:12, Michael Brohl a écrit
I agree with Micheal here that the project should not impose restrictions
on how non-privileged provide their enhancements.
Indeed, those helping non-privileged contributors should be helped to do
their part as easy as possible.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*Apache Trafodion
12 matches
Mail list logo
