the locale is not English. 10.950 is not the same as
10,95. Now that I'm thinking about it, I don't think this is a currency
issue at all. I think it is a BigDecimal conversion problem.
So, back to my original question: Where is this done?
Regards,
Ruth
Scott Gray wrote:
That's your question
it is a BigDecimal conversion problem.
So, back to my original question: Where is this done?
Regards,
Ruth
Scott Gray wrote:
That's your question :-)
Ruth's question was about how the decimal point became a comma.
If I were dealing with the problem, I would worry less about what
. A NumberFormatException will be
thrown because the String is not in the correct format (it was expecting
10,95).
That's my theory anyway.
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 2:20 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
That's your question :-)
Ruth's question was about how the decimal point became a comma.
If I were dealing
the user's locale.
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 3:26 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Yeah understood, I'm guessing people don't often override the default locale
specific formatting. The only solution I can think of would be to pass
additional locale information in the form (e.g. unitPrice_locale) which
, Adrian Crum wrote:
That's a good point. I will look into that when I have some time.
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 3:22 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
I was a little surprised to hear of the behavior in OFBiz though because if
you look at FreeMarkerWorker.makeConfiguration(), it explicitly sets a
number
Scott Gray wrote:
That's your question :-)
Ruth's question was about how the decimal point became a comma.
If I were dealing with the problem, I would worry less about what the
string looks like in any given locale and instead be worrying about
why the locale specific input parameter isn't
I'm in favor of releasing it, 3 months have passed since we created the branch
and it is relatively stable (!= bug free) now with no known deal breaking bugs
as far as I am aware.
Regards
Scott
On 27/07/2010, at 3:16 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
Hi,
Ofbiz release branch 10.04 has been around for
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Create Release from 10.04 release branch
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 8:46 PM
I'm in favor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-3823.
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the report Pierre, fixed in revs:
trunk - 978996
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892157#action_12892157
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3875:
---
The appropriate format for converting a String
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892068#action_12892068
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3862:
---
To clarify, the problem only occurs if the ajax call
On 23/07/2010, at 6:24 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Thu Jul 22 18:13:15 2010
New Revision: 966778
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966778view=rev
Log:
Applied fix from trunk for revision: 965916
Fix open file leak; the InputSource is only
As long as it doesn't break the default-value attribute I don't care, you can
easily get the old behavior by using date-time
default-value=${nowTimestamp}/
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 22/07/2010, at 1:04 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Everybody agree about that?
care about 00:00? But yes it's
subjective and I agree not a big deal...
This question also because I'm not quite sure what is the origin for the time
00:00 or now? (and how long is now, a bit of philo/humour never hurt ;o)
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
As long as it doesn't break
Thanks Hans.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 20/07/2010, at 1:52 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hansbak
Date: Tue Jul 20 01:51:59 2010
New Revision: 965711
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965711view=rev
Log:
corrected conflict in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-3840.
-
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 10.04
SVN trunk
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Jeremy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-3840:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
Start button is not showing up when production run is confirmed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12890020#action_12890020
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3859:
---
Yeah you're right, I didn't look closely enough
Hi Hans,
That view already had a statusId from the PartyRelationship entity, this causes
a warning on startup and also results in the PartyRelationship statusId field
being thrown out of the view.
If any code was depending on statusId being from the PartyRelationship entity
then it would now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-3861.
-
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 09.04
Release Branch 10.04
SVN trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12889614#action_12889614
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3834:
---
Looks fine to me, can we close this?
factoids
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12889616#action_12889616
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3838:
---
Not everything has a find page especially when
Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Scott Gray
A new external login key is generated for every request so if an ajax request
fires on a page then the externalLoginKey used in any links on the page is
invalidated.
--
This message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12889706#action_12889706
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3765:
---
Was this tested properly? Sales orders created
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-3861:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
security direct-request=false/ does not work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888932#action_12888932
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3859:
---
After looking at createCalendarExceptionDay, I see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888938#action_12888938
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3850:
---
Hi Mukesh
Please provide some steps to reproduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888956#action_12888956
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3847:
---
I think this points to a larger problem whereby
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888126#action_12888126
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3860:
---
Hans, here's the discussion from the user list
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-3860:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
ofbizUrl not transform amp; correctly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-3860.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Agreed, theres nothing worse than a bad fix.
Anyways thanks Deepak, committed
On 13/07/2010, at 3:57 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
we need is a factory for javax.jcr.Repository, and that
could be put in the content component.
I would really prefer to not mix components for a couple of
reasons:
- Some of the existing content stuff should have been in
I created and just use
those for now. I'll check it out further and see how it goes.
Regards
Scott
On 11/07/2010, at 11:51 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 11/07/2010, at 8:29 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Some initial thoughts on the Jackrabbit integration...
1. Content Repository deployment model
?
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 7/11/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Integration
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010, 2:51 AM
So as I dig into the jackrabbit jars
a bit further I realize
On 12/07/2010, at 11:33 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Sun, 7/11/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
On 12/07/2010, at 4:04 AM, Adrian
Crum wrote:
The factory will try to find a repository via JNDI,
and if that fails, use Java's SPI to find a
javax.jcr.Repository instance
more important than the
technical reasons
Regards,
Hans
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 17:49 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
I don't see a huge problem with your change but I have to admit that I don't
remember what your change actually does. There is a reason why I don't
remember though, because
the business user take
priority here.
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 19:32 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
If the setting is commented out in all OOTB web.xml files then a
non-techincal user will never be bothered by it, case closed.
As for why you would ever want to override widget.verbose=true:
Let's say you have
.
Regards
Scott
On 9/07/2010, at 7:06 PM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote:
Jep Scott after you created the branch we maybe can split the tasks and plan
the next steps.
2010/7/8 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Okay well cool, I'll go ahead and create a branch at some point, I know
Sascha has
the business reasons should take
priority and leave the system as it is now.
Regards,
Hans
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 20:07 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
Of course I just made it up, that doesn't make it an invalid scenario though.
Like I said, your business problem can easily be solved without
in the future.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
Branch is created and can be checked out from here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/jackrabbit20100709
I've committed a quick and dirty container
in web.xml is easily forgotten which actually started this
whole discussion.
Regards,
Hans
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 20:42 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
You are yet to explain why simply commenting out the web app settings in the
trunk will not solve your problem. If that is done then the business
last comment.
Regards,
Hans
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 21:02 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
That's why we comment it out, the only reason you were affected was because
it wasn't commented out. The business user never even has to know that it
exists.
If your argument now is that at some point
to be changed. That is my last comment.
Regards,
Hans
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 21:02 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
That's why we comment it out, the only reason you were affected was
because it wasn't commented out. The business user never even has to know
that it exists.
If your argument now
, by default #1 is commented out and #2 is set to true
4) as it was suggested, we remove the setting in web.xml from the template
and example applications
Kind regards,
Jacopo
On Jul 10, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Relax, I have no intention of reverting your commit without you
a list of things that need to be done? I noticed in the commit log that
licenses need to be worked on. What other tasks are there?
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 7/10/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Hippo CMS
To: dev
On 11/07/2010, at 8:29 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Some initial thoughts on the Jackrabbit integration...
1. Content Repository deployment model:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/deployment-models.html
I like the third model. OFBiz can treat the content repository the same way
it treats
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12886973#action_12886973
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3852:
---
For a branch you first need people to collaborate
On 10/07/2010, at 4:00 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Before also true could be overridden which was painfully shown in the
example component not showing comments. I see no valid business reason
why we should have that.
Let's be clear, there was no problem with the way it worked before, changing
the
.
Regards
Scott
On 10/07/2010, at 5:40 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
You still not give me a business reason why the change i did was harmful
or break anything.
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 17:02 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
On 10/07/2010, at 4:00 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Before also true could be overridden which
, etc. Now I tend to using option 2 just like what you are
doing. Maybe we can work together on this.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
Hi Michael,
The idea was to add hippo as a component and use their webapp
The context setting should override the widget.properties setting, that is the
only reason why we have a context version of the setting.
Please respond to this one, you haven't responded to the discussion regarding
your last commit yet.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
and the
messages are not shown.
Regards,
Hans
P.S. i missed the last comments, which one?
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:54 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
The context setting should override the widget.properties setting, that is
the only reason why we have a context version of the setting
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Hippo CMS
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 12:04 AM
Hi Michael,
Personally, I wouldn't do anymore than the most basic CMS
work with the existing
the description of
the code says at the top.
your setting makes that the widget.verbose by default is
false and the
messages are not shown.
Regards,
Hans
P.S. i missed the last comments, which one?
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:54 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
The context setting should override
How old is the OFBiz instance? The hex encoding was messy a few years back
which resulted in unexpected results but that's been fixed for a while now.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 7/07/2010, at 10:55 AM, CGrantAnderson wrote:
I am working on an application that
to the OrderHeader but instead of naming it
agreementId we use primaryAgreementId?
Kind regards,
Jacopo
On Jul 3, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
Not sure if this is of any use to you:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394
applications. When we are
talking about hippo what of their various products are we considering here:
Hippo CMS7
Hippo Repository 2
Hippo Site Toolkit 2
or
Hippo Portal 2.0
from www.onehippo.org
Brett
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
Anybody using or considered using Hippo CMS (onehippo.org) in
conjunction
with OFBiz?
- Apache Licensed
- Uses Jackrabbit as its repository
- Supports Versioning, Internationalization, Publishing Workflows
If there is a risk of rounding errors then I would argue that error messages in
the logs are a much better alternative than hiding the problem.
Regards
Scott
On 6/07/2010, at 7:15 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I agree with you, however the problem here is that the fields in the
database are strings
Reporter: Scott Gray
Assignee: Scott Gray
Priority: Minor
Say we have 3 UOMs A, B and C, and we have UomConversion records for:
A - B
B - C
currently the convertUom service in unable to directly convert from A - C
I propose we add support for automatically deriving
/OFBIZ-3830
Thanks
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
As a side note, this approach to i18n for the calendar doesn't work very
well, the browser reports 404 errors when trying to
retrieve localization scripts. Ideally we'd check if the file exists
before telling the browser to use it.
Regards
Same result:
Request URL:http://localhost:8080/images/calendarDateSelect/locale/en_US.js
Request Method:GET
Status Code:404 Not Found
Regards
Scott
On 5/07/2010, at 9:52 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Thanks Jacques, updating now and will report back.
Regarding the other issue I sure
?
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
Same result:
Request URL:http://localhost:8080/images/calendarDateSelect/locale/en_US.js
Request Method:GET
Status Code:404 Not Found
Regards
Scott
On 5/07/2010, at 9:52 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Thanks Jacques, updating now and will report back.
Regarding
Hi Jacopo,
Not sure if this is of any use to you:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 3/07/2010, at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
yes, I will do.
Jacopo
On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM,
Yeah no worries. I'd never really thought about it before until yesterday when
I came across a problem in the ModelMenuAction.PropertyMap action, it replaces
the existing uiLabelMap instead of adding to it like the ModelScreenAction
version does. Option was to either just copy and paste the
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: svn commit: r959875 -
/ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidgetAction.java
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010, 11:58 PM
Yeah
As a side note, this approach to i18n for the calendar doesn't work very well,
the browser reports 404 errors when trying to retrieve localization scripts.
Ideally we'd check if the file exists before telling the browser to use it.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12884610#action_12884610
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3830:
---
Hi Sascha
Direct from my browser after visiting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12884615#action_12884615
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3830:
---
Sounds great, I knew you were working on a branch
On 3/07/2010, at 2:13 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/2/10, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Because I've done it myself. ;-)
Wait, do you mean that in this case you did the actual
copying and pasting? Well... I guess that would be one
On 3/07/2010, at 3:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 3/07/2010, at 2:13 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/2/10, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Because I've done it myself. ;-)
Wait, do you mean that in this case you did
On 3/07/2010, at 3:54 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 3/07/2010, at 3:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 3/07/2010, at 2:13 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/2/10, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Because I've
Why is this in common instead of product? I'm also willing to bet that a
method already exists that does this.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 2/07/2010, at 2:05 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Thu Jul 1 14:05:21 2010
New Revision: 959673
On 2/07/2010, at 9:05 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
Why is this in common instead of product?
You are very curious :o)
Because I quickly followed the path already opened by getAssociatedStateList.
Geo is a framework level entity, that's why a method
being rushed in because I need it in the
trunk (what does that even mean?) and it was convenient to temporary put it
there.
[snip, ever considered shortening your footer?]
Scott Gray sent the following on 7/1/2010 2:47 PM:
On 2/07/2010, at 9:05 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Scott Gray wrote
On 1/07/2010, at 7:58 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I'm running MySQL through the field tests I introduced recently and it is
failing due to a bad fieldtypemysql.xml file. The file defines the
floating-point type like this:
field-type-def type=floating-point sql-type=DECIMAL(18,6)
On 1/07/2010, at 9:35 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/30/2010 2:30 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 1/07/2010, at 7:58 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I'm running MySQL through the field tests I introduced recently and it is
failing due to a bad fieldtypemysql.xml file. The file defines the
floating-point
when
enforcing NPE
or such?
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
Check the createProduct service definition. productTypeId is
required
and the out of the box code shouldn't have to deal with
any other scenario, please revert this.
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 23/06/2010
can start
implementing ASAP :-). Did we need a separate Brunch?
Cheers
Sascha
2010/6/23 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Sascha,
Any help would of course be very much appreciated.
I think regardless of what approach we take, everyone
is mostly in
agreement that we will be integrating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12881617#action_12881617
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3647:
---
Hi Erwan,
I'm sorry I should have unassigned myself
Check the createProduct service definition. productTypeId is required and the
out of the box code shouldn't have to deal with any other scenario, please
revert this.
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 23/06/2010, at 11:16 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
enforcing NPE or such?
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
Check the createProduct service definition. productTypeId is required and
the out of the box code shouldn't have to deal with
any other scenario, please revert this.
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 23/06/2010
On 24/06/2010, at 12:06 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
Not necessarily, OFBiz need only know the location of a given piece of
content and how to interact with it. So instead of entities being
related to Content records, they would instead have pointers to
locations
On 24/06/2010, at 4:25 PM, Raj Saini wrote:
of actual blog/wiki/forum code.
How did you just segue into JSR-286?
Hippo CMS is a JSR-286 provider.
I don't think Hippo is JSR-186 provider. Hippo Portal is using Apache
Jetspeed which is JSR 168/286 (Portlet API) provider and
we
started working with JCR but i think the Hippo way is a good one too :-)
So Scott i would volunteer to help you :-) ...
Have a good day
Sascha
2010/6/19 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Anybody using or considered using Hippo CMS (onehippo.org) in conjunction
with OFBiz
Won't that result in the bundle being loaded twice if another thread is waiting
for entry to create the same bundle?
Regards
Scott
On 21/06/2010, at 7:09 PM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Mon Jun 21 07:09:13 2010
New Revision: 956472
URL:
On 21/06/2010, at 7:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
Won't that result in the bundle being loaded twice if another thread is
waiting for entry to create the same bundle?
no. read it again. the bundle is not reassigned between the first
null check, and the second not null check
, it was the first I stumbled
across. Oops, I should probably go and check.
Thanks
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
You're making a pretty big assumption that CMS apps are interchangeable so
long as the repo is jackrabbit. Jackrabbit (or more
specifically the JCR) provides nothing more than a standard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12880738#action_12880738
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3828:
---
Jacques, I thought we were okay to back-port
On 21/06/2010, at 7:49 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 21/06/2010, at 7:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
Won't that result in the bundle being loaded twice if another thread is
waiting for entry to create the same bundle?
no. read it again. the bundle
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems#Java_2
Cheers
Sam
On 21/06/2010 15:42, Scott Gray wrote:
On 21/06/2010, at 7:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Scott,
Interesting, BTW why did you pick Hippo, did you compare with open
competitors (using JackRabbit underneath of course
it cursorily once, you may
find interesting reference in this ML (BTW here it is
http://markmail.org/message/w2b2fryxrfgstu77, this thread has surely
interesting things to say also...)
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
Kind of, what I'm after specifically is either CMS' built on top of
Jackrabbit
On 22/06/2010, at 4:45 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
Well it all really comes down to the question of who gets to define the
structure of the content, is it OFBiz or is it the CMS?
If it is OFBiz, then will other CMS' be able to consume that structure or
will we be left
On 22/06/2010, at 5:44 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Ean Schuessler wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
Well it all really comes down to the question of who gets to define the
structure of the content, is it OFBiz or is it the CMS?
If it is OFBiz, then will other CMS' be able to consume that structure
On 22/06/2010, at 12:35 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 22/06/2010, at 5:44 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Something not mentioned above, is that I should not be forced to
abandon my favorite editor. This includes using vim, emacs,
dreamweaver, and grep+perl+cat+sed.
Jackrabbit has
Hi Adam,
This is what the method returns now instead of the absolute file path:
jndi:/0.0.0.0/googlecheckout/WEB-INF/controller.xml
Was that your intention? I can work with it if I have to, but life was a bit
easier before this change.
Thanks
Scott
On 27/05/2010, at 2:22 AM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12880620#action_12880620
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3373:
---
There are two problems:
# There is a typo
content repository is what we want.
The concept proposed so far (as far as I can tell) is to find a way to
integrate Jackrabbit into OFBiz, then a user can select any CMS they want to
run on top of it.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott
in OFBiz at some point.
Regards
Scott
On 21/06/2010, at 3:46 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Adam,
This is what the method returns now instead of the absolute file path:
jndi:/0.0.0.0/googlecheckout/WEB-INF/controller.xml
Was that your intention? I can work with it if I have
out with integrating Jackrabbit with OFBiz.
-Adrian
--- On Fri, 6/18/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Hippo CMS
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 18, 2010, 6:57 PM
Anybody using or considered using
Hippo CMS
901 - 1000 of 2742 matches
Mail list logo
