*Correction on previous posting:*
adding vote of Deepak in the result.
Hi all,
Thanks for the votes.
This proposal passed, according to following results:
- Binding: 5 positive (+1) votes (Adrian, Jacopo, Deepak, Jacques and
Nicolas), 0 negative (-1) votes, 0 neutral (+0) votes
-
On Mar 17, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
BTW, what about the jetty component?
I just found that it uses
org.apache.taglibs.standard.glassfish-1.2.0.v201112081803.jar and all version
under 1.2.3 are
Indeed. Wil start that one coming monday.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all,
Thanks for the votes.
This proposal passed, according to following results:
- Binding: 4 positive (+1) votes (Adrian, Jacopo, Jacques and Nicolas),
0 negative (-1) votes, 0 neutral (+0) votes
- Non-Binding: 2 positive (+1) votes (Michael, Rishi), 0 negative (-1)
votes, 0
Thanks Pierre
Looking forward
Jacques
Le 20/03/2015 14:15, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Indeed. Wil start that one coming monday.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
+1 also
Le 17/03/2015 14:06, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
+1, I agree with Adrian, Jacopo and Michael comments
Jacques
Le 17/03/2015 12:31, Pierre Smits a écrit :
*Rationale:*
Back in the day (pre r11.x) we enabled users to have OFBiz working in
external web containers, like Apache Tomcat, IBM
+1.
Best Regards,
--
Rishi Solanki
Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Deepak Dixit
deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:
+1
And I also agree with Adrian.
Thanks Regards
—
*Rationale:*
Back in the day (pre r11.x) we enabled users to have OFBiz working in
external web containers, like Apache Tomcat, IBM Websphere and Jetty.
However, focus of the community migrated away from that and improved the
use of the internally used servlet solution (also Apache Tomcat).
Since
Indeed
On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
wrote:
+1
I would like to suggest a separate but related discussion: Should we
re-engineer OFBiz so that it is easier to deploy in various application
servers?
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
I would like to add that this vote is about moving the specialpurpose/appserver
component to attic: the component was intended to create the configuration
scripts for the deployment on application servers; as Pierre mentioned, this
approach doesn't work anymore unless you use very old and
+1
And I also agree with Adrian.
Thanks Regards
—
Deepak Dixit
On Mar 17, 2015, at 5:01 PM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
*Rationale:*
Back in the day (pre r11.x) we enabled users to have OFBiz working in
external web containers, like Apache Tomcat, IBM Websphere and Jetty.
+1
I would like to suggest a separate but related discussion: Should we
re-engineer OFBiz so that it is easier to deploy in various application
servers?
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 3/17/2015 11:31 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
*Rationale:*
Back in the day (pre
+1
And I agree with Adrian: it would be a win for OFBiz if it could be
deployed in various application servers easily. It could increase the
acceptance bei companies who have a restrictive policy for their system
landscape or simply have the know-how for other appliaction servers and
don't
+1, I agree with Adrian, Jacopo and Michael comments
Jacques
Le 17/03/2015 12:31, Pierre Smits a écrit :
*Rationale:*
Back in the day (pre r11.x) we enabled users to have OFBiz working in
external web containers, like Apache Tomcat, IBM Websphere and Jetty.
However, focus of the community
BTW, what about the jetty component?
I just found that it uses org.apache.taglibs.standard.glassfish-1.2.0.v201112081803.jar and all version under 1.2.3 are vulnerable
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-0254
Jacques
Le 17/03/2015 14:06, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
+1,
15 matches
Mail list logo
