Hi Nicolas,
No thank you, I just wait for the Freemarker vote to pass...
I have also created
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+24.xx+Roadmap
HTH
Jacques
Le 14/05/2024 à 17:20, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
Do you need some help to move forward
Hello Jacques,
Do you need some help to move forward on this subject ?
Nicolas
Le 28/03/2024 à 10:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on
trunk next week
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935
TIA (for your tests see
Thanks Jacques !
gil
On 28/03/24 10:05, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on trunk next
> week
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935
>
> TIA (for your tests see also the patch in OFBIZ-12934)
>
> Jacques
>
Hi,
Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on trunk next
week
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935
TIA (for your tests see also the patch in OFBIZ-12934)
Jacques
Hi Team,
I created this Jira in order to test next FreeMarker release.
Of course everyone is called to test
TIA
Jacques
Message transféré
Sujet : [jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-12934) Test next FreeMarker release
Date : Sat, 9 Mar 2024 16:18:00 + (UTC)
De :Jacques
Long ago we opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7675 for that
>
> Few days ago Dániel Dékány (VP and main contributor to Apache Freemarker
> project) wrote at FREEMARKER-189 (https://s.apache.org/fitxs):
>
>< the Manual). [...] Then people can't accidentally forget adding
Hi,
Long ago we opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7675 for that
Few days ago Dániel Dékány (VP and main contributor to Apache Freemarker
project) wrote at FREEMARKER-189 (https://s.apache.org/fitxs):
<>
I was reluctant do use all auto-escaping features. But I beli
Created OFBIZ-12099 for this new feature.
On 2020/12/20 07:41:03, James Yong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the feedbacks.
>
> Plan to allow freemarker square interpolation syntax, i.e. [=...],
> when the template filename extension is '.sqi.ftl'.
> So it will not affe
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedbacks.
Plan to allow freemarker square interpolation syntax, i.e. [=...],
when the template filename extension is '.sqi.ftl'.
So it will not affect existing templates that doesn't use js template literal.
sqi is abbreviation for square interpolation.
Regards,
James
m 10:43 schrieb James Yong:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently interpolation syntax used for freemarker template is ${...}.
> > This is the same as the interpolation syntax for template literal in
> > javascript.
> > As a result, extra coding is needed to escape the
ways, leaving it up to the
developer to use the [=...] Syntax where necessary?
Best regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 12.12.20 um 10:43 schrieb James Yong:
Hi all,
Currently interpolation syntax used for freemarker template is ${...}.
This is the same
ques
> >
> > Le 12/12/2020 à 10:43, James Yong a écrit :
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Currently interpolation syntax used for freemarker template is ${...}.
> > > This is the same as the interpolation syntax for template literal in
> > javascript
.com
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 3:59 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I see no problems with that: +1
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 12/12/2020 à 10:43, James Yong a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently
Hi James,
I see no problems with that: +1
Jacques
Le 12/12/2020 à 10:43, James Yong a écrit :
Hi all,
Currently interpolation syntax used for freemarker template is ${...}.
This is the same as the interpolation syntax for template literal in javascript.
As a result, extra coding is needed
Hi all,
Currently interpolation syntax used for freemarker template is ${...}.
This is the same as the interpolation syntax for template literal in
javascript.
As a result, extra coding is needed to escape the interpolation expression for
javascript coding with freemarker template.
Propose
gt;
> in rev. 1762227 I have cleaned up and modified several methods to better
> leverage the Freemarker API and remove some of the unnecessary dependencies
> on FM.
>
> Please refer to the commit log for details.
>
> While I did my best to make sure that the new code works fine, a
Hi all,
in rev. 1762227 I have cleaned up and modified several methods to better
leverage the Freemarker API and remove some of the unnecessary dependencies
on FM.
Please refer to the commit log for details.
While I did my best to make sure that the new code works fine, and I have
introduced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-7675:
---
Summary: Investigate if we should turn Freemarker autoescaping on (was:
Investigate if we
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-7675:
--
Summary: Investigate if we should turn on Freemarker autoescaping
Key: OFBIZ-7675
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7675
Project: OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15355057#comment-15355057
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-7041:
I created OFBIZ-7675 for that
> Upgrade freemarker
crossed (at bottom) of
OFBIZ-7041 and more recently at OFBIZ-7343, let's see...
> Upgrade freemarker jar to 2.3.24
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7041
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7041
>
iz. We have a couple of
<#noescape> which should be replaced by <#noautoesc>. So I agree we could set
the Freemarker environement to auto-escaping, and test if it has not unexpected
side-effects.
> Upgrade freemarker jar to 2.3.24
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit closed OFBIZ-6810.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Branch
> Refactor components regarding freemar
is the parent ticket for groovy files OFBIZ-7218
was (Author: deepak.dixit):
Here is the parent ticket for groovy moving OFBIZ-7218
> Refactor components regarding freemarker file locations
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
>
> Refactor components regarding freemarker file locations
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Is
Deepak Dixit created OFBIZ-7218:
---
Summary: Refactor components regarding freemarker file locations
Key: OFBIZ-7218
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7218
Project: OFBiz
Issue
of Freemarker
template files, right?
> Upgrade freemarker jar to 2.3.24
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7041
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7041
> Project: OFBiz
> Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15314846#comment-15314846
]
Forrest Rae commented on OFBIZ-7041:
This new version of FreeMarker includes [auto-escaping and output
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-6810:
Summary: Refactor components regarding freemarker file locations (was:
Refactor components
for the contribution. Your changes are committed in trunk at
r1744918.
> FreeMarker template error: Template inclusion failed, on selection bluelight
> theme
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7103
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-7103:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
> FreeMarker template error: Template inclus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rahul Bhammarker updated OFBIZ-7103:
Attachment: bluelight.patch
> FreeMarker template error: Template inclusion fai
Rahul Bhammarker created OFBIZ-7103:
---
Summary: FreeMarker template error: Template inclusion failed, on
selection bluelight theme
Key: OFBIZ-7103
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7103
much Ravi for the contribution. Your changes are committed at
following revisions:
Release14.12 - 1744848
Release13.07 - 1744849
> Error executing freeMarker template when generating inventory report
>
>
>
.
Thanks,
--
Ravi
> Error executing freeMarker template when generating inventory report
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7074
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-7074:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
> Error executing freeMarker template w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ravi Lodhi updated OFBIZ-7074:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-7074-14.12.patch
OFBIZ-7074-13.07.patch
> Error executing freeMar
quot;.
2) Macro "renderTextField" has no parameter with name "placeHolder".
Step to regenerate:
1) Go to FACILITY component.
2) Select a warehouse and go to Inventory screen and generate pdf
(/facility/control/ViewFacilityInventoryByProduct).
3) See the consol
Ravi Lodhi created OFBIZ-7074:
-
Summary: Error executing freeMarker template when generating
inventory report
Key: OFBIZ-7074
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7074
Project: OFBiz
when all subtasks will be
done...
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit closed OFBIZ-7041.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Branch
> Upgrade freemarker jar to 2.3
ade freemarker jar to 2.3.24
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7041
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7041
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: framework
>
will create a new issue for the Groovy moving, after OFBIZ-6981 will be done,
and will close this one...
was (Author: jacques.le.roux):
I will create a new issue for the Groovy moving, after OFBIZ-6891 will be done,
and will close this one...
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker f
OFBIZ-6891 will be done,
and will close this one...
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit reassigned OFBIZ-7041:
---
Assignee: Deepak Dixit
> Upgrade freemarker jar to 2.3
Deepak Dixit created OFBIZ-7041:
---
Summary: Upgrade freemarker jar to 2.3.24
Key: OFBIZ-7041
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7041
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
ovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
>
the patches in
the code base.
Best regards,
Pierre
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
>
not sure we really want to
do that...
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
. If it's the case
sharing it.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
. If it's the case
sharing it.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
the
case sharing it. )
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
!
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
>
not be applied as
such as a svn mv must be executed).
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji
create patches with
history in them it seems.
It has to be done by the committers directly. I will double-check that though...
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key
nts regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Is
will they have the same impact?
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
to new location, else
svn history will be lost.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
ing groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
/confluence/x/C4B2
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
a placeholder can be found. ;-)
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
tor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Is
. It is better to have it
somewhere in the pages.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
ovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Co
tor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15217722#comment-15217722
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6810:
-
Unfortunately the naming convention for Freemarker template
ing groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
for file naming.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
file in current
approach.
IMO we need to use Upper camel case pattern for file naming.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
>
14.12.01
Following "Reproduction Steps" in OFBIZ-6057 I cannot reproduce
R12.04 not fixed
> Complete OFBIZ-6057 (error in Freemarker 2.3 versions higher than 2.3.19)
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15212898#comment-15212898
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6810:
:p
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemar
...
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Is
it seems an unilateral decision of yours? Anyway if nobody complains I'll
commit your patches in few days. Thanks!
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key
/groovyscript/script.groovy
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
>
sub_folder name is enough because so far (and I
guess in future) Minilang is only used for map_proc and
services_implementations (including tests services), so there are no ambiguities
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker f
already have a folder
called script. Having groovy script files there fits the naming convention and
meaning.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-6810:
-
Sprint: Community Day 1 - 2016
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker f
tor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Is
ing groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
a vote ?
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBi
attention. A reference to
http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq would be needed
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin closed OFBIZ-4547.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
This issue is too old
> renderDateTimeField Freemarker macro igno
for Java classes.
Sincerely I did not put much thoughts on this and I could have missed
something... Notably how much changes this entails for the *"component://"*
notation
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker f
as (Author: jacques.le.roux):
Also I just rethought about it, anyway the Java package name way is required to
avoid filenames collisions, so not only for Java classes but all languages.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker f
name way is required to
avoid filenames collisions, so not only for Java classes but all languages.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
>
related to screen/widget under
*component/script/language*
and all script or compilate code related to event / service or API under
*component/src/language*
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locati
add finalize pattern in ticket
and then put effort on this.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.
be needed.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project:
the folders structures for
groovy and freemarker? I remember there was a whish to separate pure groovy
scripts from groovy file possibly compiled:
http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locati
.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
>
engaging more efforts, did we agree about the folders structures for
groovy and freemarker? I remember there was a whish to separate pure groovy
scripts from groovy files possibly compiled:
http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
was (Author: jacques.le.roux):
Before engaging more efforts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-6810:
Summary: Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
(was: Refactor
on the dev ML right?
Note that we don't backport improvements to freezed branches but in exceptional
cases with a consensus (not a lazy one)
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
>
discusion in the
description. I will do so accordingly.
With respects to backporting to freezed branches: there have been precedents.
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
>
the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of
.groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files.
See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx
was:This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues
regarding the refactoring
Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-6810:
---
Summary: Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker files
Key: OFBIZ-6810
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
Project: OFBiz
Issue
the dev ML thread, they are a consensus to realize the reallocation.
However I prefer keep it on only on trunk.
I wait one week and if ok I propage your works
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin reassigned OFBIZ-6810:
Assignee: Nicolas Malin
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker f
FreeMarker Template Tester which though uses
FreeMarker 2.3.23.
TO test get to http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/
enter
{code}
<#ftl strip_whitespace=false>
SAMPLE _ PRODUCT
<#assign test = "SAMPLE _ PRODUCT">
${test}
{code}
Which proves it works in both cases
* plai
1 - 100 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
