All demos now run with Java 8. Still Buildbot pending...
Jacques
Le 19/10/2015 10:34, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Le 18/10/2015 23:23, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks Taher,
It should be OK, but I'll remember ;)
Jacques
Jacques, Taher, hanks for this issue and your time !
Le 18/10/2015 23:23, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks Taher,
It should be OK, but I'll remember ;)
Jacques
Jacques, Taher, hanks for this issue and your time !
le.r...@les7arts.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 18 October, 2015 1:36:22 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
Hi Taher,
Yes I remember now, that's exactly why I was reluctant to do so. I have
a message remembering me that popping everyday... for months (I h
;jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 18 October, 2015 1:36:22 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
Hi Taher,
Yes I remember now, that's exactly why I was reluctant to do so. I have a
message remembering me that popping everyday... for mon
gt;>> builds:
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Taher Alkhateeb
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
>>>> To: dev@ofbiz.
system for trunk to use
JDK 8.
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Wheeler" <rwhee...@artifact-software.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 14 October, 2015 3:40:33 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
Good point about
com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 18 October, 2015 1:36:22 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
Hi Taher,
Yes I remember now, that's exactly why I was reluctant to do so. I have a
message remembering me that popping everyday... for months (I have tons of
others :D)
Ac
Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 18 October, 2015 1:36:22 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
Hi Taher,
Yes I remember now, that's exactly why I was reluctant
14 October, 2015 3:40:33 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
Good point about the backporting.
This will have an effect on the enthusiasm for backporting fixes.
Comparing trunk and backported code will certainly make for some good
examples about how to use Java 8 to wr
is the exact patch line in macros.xml that would fail the builds:
+
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 18 October, 2015 1:36:22 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in
gt;>> is pretty much ready to move to JDK 8. I'm not sure if lazy consensus is
>>> enough or whether a vote is warranted to move this issue forward?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Taher Alkhateeb
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
&g
.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 10:52:00 AM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I don't think that it is a question of using or not using J8. It is more
about when to move it into trunk, as from that moment on there will be
backward compatibility i
?
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 14 October, 2015 12:23:31 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I tend to agree. Actually there are 2 points
m: "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 10:52:00 AM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I don't think that it is a question of using or not using J8. It is more
about when to move it into trunk, as from that
-
From: "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 10:52:00 AM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I don't think that it is a question of using or not using J8. It is more
about when to move it into trunk, as
ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 14 October, 2015 12:23:31 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I tend to agree. Actually there are 2 points,
1) use Java 8 to compile
2) use new Java 8 features
We can already do 1, but we should maybe wait the next freezed branch to do
.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 14 October, 2015 12:23:31 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I tend to agree. Actually there are 2 points,
1) use Java 8 to compile
2) use new Java 8 features
We can already do 1, but we should maybe wait the next freezed
: "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 10:52:00 AM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I don't think that it is a question of using or not using J8. It is more
about when to move it into trunk, as
0 AM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I don't think that it is a question of using or not using J8. It is more
about when to move it into trunk, as from that moment on there will be
backward compatibility issues.
A helpful solution in this respect could be to designate a specifi
, ==@gteq}
- Original Message -
From: Taher Alkhateeb slidingfilame...@gmail.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 25 May, 2015 8:08:25 AM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
Hello everyone,
Okay, so it seems there is consensus on going ahead with Java 8. I
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 5 June, 2015 6:48:50 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
I would recommend committing each fix separately, then log the revision
numbers in a single Jira issue.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 25 May, 2015 8:08:25 AM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
Hello everyone,
Okay, so it seems there is consensus on going ahead with Java 8. I tried
testing this patch which I believe upgrades OFBiz to JDK 8.
Running ./ant clean-all build load
)
error log end
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 8:12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk
On 07/05/2015 12:37 PM, Christian Geisert wrote:
Well
Not a separate instance, just a change in the Python BuildBot script; nothing
complicated
Jacques
Le 07/05/2015 10:12, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Wouldn't we need a separate CI instance on J8 to ensure that tests don't
fail?
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
+1
I think it would be strange to do a 1st release of 14.12 without moving
from (then non-supported) Java 1.7 to 1.8.
Michael
ecomify GmbH
www.ecomify.de
Am 07.05.15 um 09:58 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
On May 7, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think
Ok Thanks Scott and Jacques.
So Who is against use java 8 and more on trunk ?
:)
Nicolas
Le 07/05/2015 08:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Yes (lazy) consensus over vote ;)
Jacques
Le 07/05/2015 05:02, Scott Gray a écrit :
I'm not sure if a vote is necessary, particularly if no one has any
I don't think that it is a question of using or not using J8. It is more
about when to move it into trunk, as from that moment on there will be
backward compatibility issues.
A helpful solution in this respect could be to designate a specific release
branch now (e.g. r15 or r16), create the
Yes (lazy) consensus over vote ;)
Jacques
Le 07/05/2015 05:02, Scott Gray a écrit :
I'm not sure if a vote is necessary, particularly if no one has any
objections.
Regards
Scott
On 7 May 2015 07:44, Nicolas Malin nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr wrote:
I'm favorable to use java 8.
I think it's will
On May 7, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that it is a question of using or not using J8. It is more
about when to move it into trunk, as from that moment on there will be
backward compatibility issues.
I think we could do it also in the 14.12
I tend to agree
Jacques
Le 07/05/2015 09:58, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On May 7, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that it is a question of using or not using J8. It is more
about when to move it into trunk, as from that moment on there will be
Wouldn't we need a separate CI instance on J8 to ensure that tests don't
fail?
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Jacopo
Not a reply to Jacques, but if an absolutely java-8-only feature is
used, be sure to update the regex in ${ofbiz.home}/macros.xml, then the
source/target values in common.xml in the same folder.
ps: I'm fine with moving towards 1.8. It's not a choice that we can
make, actually.
On
+1
Java 8 works well, is supported and opens a lot of doors for new ways to
write clearer code.
Ron
On 07/05/2015 4:58 AM, Michael Brohl wrote:
+1
I think it would be strange to do a 1st release of 14.12 without
moving from (then non-supported) Java 1.7 to 1.8.
Michael
ecomify GmbH
Yes, we must support Java 8, but we absolutely have the choice to still
support Java 7 (i.e. no use of Java 8 only features yet)
IMHO there should be good reasons to use these Java 8 features (not just
because it's cool..)
It's not a big deal to update a developer machine to Java 8 (well, my
Well call it Standards Office or whatever, the guys who decide which
platforms are allowed to use in the company.
Java 8 is available since just about a year..
Just the mentioned Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (= Longtime Support, which means
support for 5 years) has no Java 8 in the official repositories.
Is
On 07/05/2015 12:37 PM, Christian Geisert wrote:
Well call it Standards Office or whatever, the guys who decide which
platforms are allowed to use in the company.
Java 7 will be coming off the list in most companies if it has not
already been done.
Java 8 is available since just about a
I'm favorable to use java 8.
I think it's will be pretty fin if you can support oracle jdk8 and
openjdk8 also.
I propose to organize a vote to validate or not this proposition
Nicolas
Le 03/05/2015 11:52, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Taher,
Yes I think so. For now well known (I hope ;))
I'm not sure if a vote is necessary, particularly if no one has any
objections.
Regards
Scott
On 7 May 2015 07:44, Nicolas Malin nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr wrote:
I'm favorable to use java 8.
I think it's will be pretty fin if you can support oracle jdk8 and
openjdk8 also.
I propose to
Hi everyone,
I would like to work on a few JIRAs and at the same refactor some existing
code to utilize Lambdas and Streams utilizing Java 8 features.
Is it acceptable to develop with JDK 8 features into trunk?
Taher Alkhateeb
Hi Taher,
Yes I think so. For now well known (I hope ;)) security reasons, if people want
to use Oracle JDK they need to use Java 8.
So implementing with new Java 8 features now in trunk sounds good to me. BTW
this is only my opinion...
Note that our demos are still using OpenJDK 1.7 I'm not
40 matches
Mail list logo
