Re: Loading standard web application

2021-04-29 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Ivan, Your message has been moderated, else it would not have reached this Mailing List. Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email client. See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html. You will get a better support, people can answer you on the

Re: Loading standard web application

2021-04-28 Thread IvanD
This is a great idea and I have multiple use cases where I need to run a standard web application within OfBiz. Was "type" ever added to the code base for ofbiz-component.xml? More specifically, is this functionality available in version 17.12.07? I am not sure from this thread what the outcome

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-08 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
On May 8, 2017 6:13 PM, "James Yong" <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > Thank you for looking into the matter. > > Was just looking at loading standard web application due to one use-case, > but the issue of deploying OFBiz WAR was bought up. &

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-08 Thread James Yong
Hi Jacopo, Thank you for looking into the matter. Was just looking at loading standard web application due to one use-case, but the issue of deploying OFBiz WAR was bought up. Just to reiterate that allowing standard web application now should not impede efforts towards building OFBiz WAR

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-08 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi James, thanks for your design proposal and implementation: I have reviewed your patch in Jira and it looks good to me. As mentioned by Taher, in the future we may try to move away from the OFBiz container driven startup process in order to make OFBiz more easily deployable in an application

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-07 Thread James Yong
Hi Taher, Hope to address your concerns. My replies are inlined below. Thanks. Regards, James On 2017-05-08 01:22 (+0800), Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > Hey Michael, James, all > > First of all, I gotta say James' efforts are awesome, keep them coming :) > > The

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-07 Thread Michael Brohl
ration of the exact "why" and "how". All good initiatives ! Cheers, Taher Alkhateeb On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: Hi Taher, Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard web application' and opening t

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-07 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
-05-06 19:27 (+0800), "James Yong"<jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Taher. >>>>>> >>>>>> Those are the big pictures. For now, need to work on the smaller >>>>>> >>>>> issues. >

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
s, I guess we can start discussing this at a more detailed level once you have a PoC or more elaborate exploration of the exact "why" and "how". All good initiatives ! Cheers, Taher Alkhateeb On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrot

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-07 Thread Michael Brohl
r Alkhateeb On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: Hi Taher, Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard web application' and opening the discussion. Instead of converting OFBiz fully into a single web application, i suggest w

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-07 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
gfilame...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi James, > > > > > > > > > > I guess we can start discussing this at a more detailed level once > you > > > have > > > > > a PoC or more elaborate exploration

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-07 Thread James Yong
cussing this at a more detailed level once you > > have > > > > a PoC or more elaborate exploration of the exact "why" and "how". All > > good > > > > initiatives ! > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > &

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-07 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
t; > Cheers, > > > > > > Taher Alkhateeb > > > > > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Taher, > > > > > > > > Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loadi

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-06 Thread James Yong
e detailed level once you have > > a PoC or more elaborate exploration of the exact "why" and "how". All good > > initiatives ! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Taher Alkhateeb > > > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-06 Thread James Yong
lt;jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Taher, > > > > Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard web > > application' and opening the discussion. > > > > Instead of converting OFBiz fully into a single web application, i suggest

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-06 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
te: > Hi Taher, > > Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard web > application' and opening the discussion. > > Instead of converting OFBiz fully into a single web application, i suggest > we can have build functions: > 1. to compile OFBiz into a W

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-05 Thread James Yong
Hi Taher, Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard web application' and opening the discussion. Instead of converting OFBiz fully into a single web application, i suggest we can have build functions: 1. to compile OFBiz into a WAR. This build-WAR function is optional

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-05 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
Hmmm, I'm not sure, but on first glance I'm not sure the best way to integrate is by dropping in a war file? Maybe a more robust solution is to have an integration with the engine on the API level and instantiate it from within OFBiz within its own control servlet. For example, take a look at how

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-05 Thread James Yong
Hi Taher, I am trying to develop an OFBiz plugin that consists of a) Camunda workflow engine (published as a WAR); and b) OFBiz web app that make use of the workflow engine. Allowing OFBiz to load standard web applications will allow me to achieve the above setup using only 1 plugin, making

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-05 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
This topic is very much linked to the previous thread that you started earleri "Tomcat SSO" so they might as well be one topic. I think I answered most stuff in that thread. However, I would add that in my opinion, maybe it would be simpler if we avoid implementing it in this fashion (ofbiz

Re: Loading standard web application

2017-05-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi James, Here again a POC is welcome. Jacques Le 05/05/2017 à 10:35, James Yong a écrit : Hi all, I am looking into allowing OFBiz to load standard web application where there is no controller.xml and the jar files residing in web-inf/lib folder. Proposing to add an attribute named

Loading standard web application

2017-05-05 Thread James Yong
Hi all, I am looking into allowing OFBiz to load standard web application where there is no controller.xml and the jar files residing in web-inf/lib folder. Proposing to add an attribute named 'type' to the 'webapp' tag at ofbiz-component.xml, i.e. This new attribute will help to