Hi Ivan,
Your message has been moderated, else it would not have reached this Mailing
List.
Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email
client.
See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
You will get a better support, people can answer you on the
This is a great idea and I have multiple use cases where I need to run a
standard web application within OfBiz. Was "type" ever added to the code
base for ofbiz-component.xml? More specifically, is this functionality
available in version 17.12.07? I am not sure from this thread what the
outcome
On May 8, 2017 6:13 PM, "James Yong" <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thank you for looking into the matter.
>
> Was just looking at loading standard web application due to one use-case,
> but the issue of deploying OFBiz WAR was bought up.
&
Hi Jacopo,
Thank you for looking into the matter.
Was just looking at loading standard web application due to one use-case,
but the issue of deploying OFBiz WAR was bought up.
Just to reiterate that allowing standard web application now should not impede
efforts towards building OFBiz WAR
Hi James,
thanks for your design proposal and implementation: I have reviewed your
patch in Jira and it looks good to me.
As mentioned by Taher, in the future we may try to move away from the OFBiz
container driven startup process in order to make OFBiz more easily
deployable in an application
Hi Taher,
Hope to address your concerns.
My replies are inlined below.
Thanks.
Regards,
James
On 2017-05-08 01:22 (+0800), Taher Alkhateeb
wrote:
> Hey Michael, James, all
>
> First of all, I gotta say James' efforts are awesome, keep them coming :)
>
> The
ration of the exact "why" and "how".
All
good
initiatives !
Cheers,
Taher Alkhateeb
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi Taher,
Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard
web
application' and opening t
-05-06 19:27 (+0800), "James Yong"<jamesy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Taher.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those are the big pictures. For now, need to work on the smaller
>>>>>>
>>>>> issues.
>
s,
I guess we can start discussing this at a more detailed level once
you
have
a PoC or more elaborate exploration of the exact "why" and "how".
All
good
initiatives !
Cheers,
Taher Alkhateeb
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org>
wrot
r Alkhateeb
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi Taher,
Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard
web
application' and opening the discussion.
Instead of converting OFBiz fully into a single web application,
i
suggest
w
gfilame...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi James,
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess we can start discussing this at a more detailed level once
> you
> > > have
> > > > > a PoC or more elaborate exploration
cussing this at a more detailed level once you
> > have
> > > > a PoC or more elaborate exploration of the exact "why" and "how". All
> > good
> > > > initiatives !
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > &
t; > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Taher Alkhateeb
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Taher,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loadi
e detailed level once you have
> > a PoC or more elaborate exploration of the exact "why" and "how". All good
> > initiatives !
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Taher Alkhateeb
> >
> > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Yong <jamesy
lt;jamesy...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Taher,
> >
> > Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard web
> > application' and opening the discussion.
> >
> > Instead of converting OFBiz fully into a single web application, i suggest
te:
> Hi Taher,
>
> Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard web
> application' and opening the discussion.
>
> Instead of converting OFBiz fully into a single web application, i suggest
> we can have build functions:
> 1. to compile OFBiz into a W
Hi Taher,
Thank you also for the thoughts shared in the 'Loading standard web
application' and opening the discussion.
Instead of converting OFBiz fully into a single web application, i suggest we
can have build functions:
1. to compile OFBiz into a WAR. This build-WAR function is optional
Hmmm, I'm not sure, but on first glance I'm not sure the best way to
integrate is by dropping in a war file? Maybe a more robust solution is to
have an integration with the engine on the API level and instantiate it
from within OFBiz within its own control servlet. For example, take a look
at how
Hi Taher,
I am trying to develop an OFBiz plugin that consists of
a) Camunda workflow engine (published as a WAR); and
b) OFBiz web app that make use of the workflow engine.
Allowing OFBiz to load standard web applications will allow me to achieve the
above setup using only 1 plugin, making
This topic is very much linked to the previous thread that you started
earleri "Tomcat SSO" so they might as well be one topic. I think I answered
most stuff in that thread.
However, I would add that in my opinion, maybe it would be simpler if we
avoid implementing it in this fashion (ofbiz
Hi James,
Here again a POC is welcome.
Jacques
Le 05/05/2017 à 10:35, James Yong a écrit :
Hi all,
I am looking into allowing OFBiz to load standard web application where there
is no controller.xml and the jar files residing in web-inf/lib folder.
Proposing to add an attribute named
Hi all,
I am looking into allowing OFBiz to load standard web application where there
is no controller.xml and the jar files residing in web-inf/lib folder.
Proposing to add an attribute named 'type' to the 'webapp' tag at
ofbiz-component.xml, i.e.
This new attribute will help to
22 matches
Mail list logo