>
> As for my first issue that I expect will end up as a derby constraint,
> I'll start with my most recent issue that I run into regularly:
> Before that, I should mention that I don't actually use derby so may be
> blaming some things are derby that are undue, by misunderstanding some of
> its
Hi,
inline...
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 08.03.22 um 19:11 schrieb Development:
I just don't see the necessity to drop Derby support and exclude those people
who do not want to use Docker (for whatever reason) or need the current OOTB
behaviour.
"need the current OOTB
From: Michael Brohl [michael.br...@ecomify.de]
>Am 07.03.22 um 18:44 schrieb Development:
>> So let me try to summarize your response:
>>
>> #1. The only reason to *keep* derby that you see is that we disagree on the
>> relative difficultly of getting a
Please see my responses inline...
Regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 07.03.22 um 18:44 schrieb Development:
So let me try to summarize your response:
#1. The only reason to *keep* derby that you see is that we disagree on the relative difficultly of
getting a "simple
From: Michael Brohl [michael.br...@ecomify.de]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2022 2:22 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: New proposal on Jira to drop support for derby and use docker
instead
>Hi ? (no name given),
Hi there! :)
So let me try to
Hi ? (no name given),
I don't see a reason to DROP the derby support in OFBiz and replace it
with docker. What we can and should do is to offer is a docker demo
besides this. There are already initiatives to do this.
In our experience, users already have problems with the simple build and
I added a new proposal on Jira . It is a proposal to drop support for derby
and use docker instead (You'll need to read the issue/proposal for that to make
sense) The issue is at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12588
This is a copy of the proposal:
Derby is unique in the list
