Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

Hi Ingo, Your message has been moderated. Please subscribe to the dev ML and then use your email client. See here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html. Thanks Jacques Le 31/01/2020 à 15:12, Ingo Könemann a écrit : -1 Ingo Könemann

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

Hi Ulrich , Your message has been moderated. Please subscribe to the dev ML and then use your email client. See here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html. Thanks Jacques Le 31/01/2020 à 15:13, Ulrich Heidfeld a écrit : -1 Ulrich Heidfeld

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Ulrich Heidfeld

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Ingo Könemann

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Dennis Balkir Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18,

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

+1 Jacques Le 24/01/2020 à 11:27, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 -- Thanks & Regards Pawan Verma Technical Consultant *HotWax Systems* *Enterprise open source experts* http://www.hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:30 PM Benjamin Jugl wrote: > -1 > > Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > > Hi, > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Best regards, Swapnil M Mane, ofbiz.apache.org On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:57 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. > We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Thanks and Regards, Aditya Sharma On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:02 PM James Yong wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > James > > On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > support. We can soon expect a last release

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

+1 Regards, James On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Best Regards, Suraj Khurana SENIOR TECHNICAL CONSULTANT On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 1:34 PM Deepak Dixit wrote: > -1 > > Kind Regards, > Deepak Dixit > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 10:24 PM Martin Becker > wrote: > > > -1 > > > > Martin Becker > > > > > > > > > > On 2020/01/24 10:27:15,

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Kind Regards, Deepak Dixit On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 10:24 PM Martin Becker wrote: > -1 > > Martin Becker > > > > > On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi,> > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > support. We can soon expect a last release

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Martin Becker On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi,> > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > > released package> > > Some would prefer to release R17

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

Jacques Le Roux writes: > Vote: > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead. > [ -1]  Release R17 before releasing R18 +1 -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

+1 Thanks Paul Foxworthy On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 21:27, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. > We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

0 Jacopo On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. > We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most of us are not backporting since we turned to Git. I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons? Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Taher, Are you backporting  much?  Since we

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

Hi Taher, Are you backporting  much?  Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;) As I said to Nicolas: <> Let's see what the future will tell us... Jacques Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : -1 I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi, > > > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > support. We > > can

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

+1 On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be > released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Nicolas On 24/01/2020 11:27, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of > support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about > the next to be released package > > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18,

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

-1 Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi, R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be released package Some would prefer to

Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.

+1 Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory , PMC Member* Apache Incubator , committer *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)