Re: Questions about demo instances [was Re: Summary of some recent discussions around the OFBiz release roadmap and some proposals]

2012-04-23 Thread Christian Geisert
Jacques Le Roux schrieb: [..] I was at the origin of this demand. Christian handled it with infra (demo.old.ofbiz domain), so it's ready, it's just a matter of redirection to ask to infra. I'm about to get it finally running.. Christian

Re: Questions about demo instances [was Re: Summary of some recent discussions around the OFBiz release roadmap and some proposals]

2012-04-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Christian, From: Christian Geisert christian.geis...@isu-gmbh.de Jacques Le Roux schrieb: [..] I was at the origin of this demand. Christian handled it with infra (demo.old.ofbiz domain), so it's ready, it's just a matter of redirection to ask to infra. I'm about to get it finally

Re: Questions about demo instances [was Re: Summary of some recent discussions around the OFBiz release roadmap and some proposals]

2012-04-23 Thread Pierre Smits
Hi Jacques, I believe it is not good to expose potential end users to something that can be expected to be broken (meaning trunk) as a demo environment, because of the high rate of development taking place in that environment. I also believe that Jacopo said that something is in the rules,

Re: Questions about demo instances [was Re: Summary of some recent discussions around the OFBiz release roadmap and some proposals]

2012-04-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Apr 23, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: I also believe that Jacopo said that something is in the rules, regulations and/or guidelines of the ASF about the same issue. We simply have to make sure it is always clear when a resource is unreleased and intended for OFBiz developers only

Re: Questions about demo instances [was Re: Summary of some recent discussions around the OFBiz release roadmap and some proposals]

2012-04-23 Thread Pierre Smits
I agree. Demo environments is not for OFBiz developers. If you want to have an OFBiz developer to have a viewpoint on trunk where they can experience what has been changed in trunk I believe that there are betters means available and in place already (SVN, CI reports, etc) As far as I can see

Re: Questions about demo instances [was Re: Summary of some recent discussions around the OFBiz release roadmap and some proposals]

2012-04-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
What we could do is still support it but don't link it from main site and such Because it's very convenient for committers to have another running trunk system Jacques From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com I agree. Demo environments is not for OFBiz developers. If you want to have an

Re: Questions about demo instances [was Re: Summary of some recent discussions around the OFBiz release roadmap and some proposals]

2012-04-23 Thread Pierre Smits
This is a reasonable compromise. My suggestion for the URL regarding the latest stable release: http(s)://demo.ofbiz.apache.org or: http(s)://demo-ofbiz.apache.org Regards, Pierre Op 23 april 2012 10:25 schreef Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com het volgende: What we could do is

Re: Questions about demo instances [was Re: Summary of some recent discussions around the OFBiz release roadmap and some proposals]

2012-04-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com This is a reasonable compromise. My suggestion for the URL regarding the latest stable release: http(s)://demo.ofbiz.apache.org or: http(s)://demo-ofbiz.apache.org This will not change, it was already difficult to get the names from ASF/infra, sot it