:-)
Thank you Jacques.
Jacopo
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> With 3 positive committers I decided to go, done for R14.12 r1744733
>
> R13.07 will need more work...
>
>
>
> Le 20/05/2016 à 14:12, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> It
Thanks Jacques
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> With 3 positive committers I decided to go, done for R14.12 r1744733
>
> R13.07 will need more work...
>
>
>
> Le 20/05/2016 à 14:12,
With 3 positive committers I decided to go, done for R14.12 r1744733
R13.07 will need more work...
Le 20/05/2016 à 14:12, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
It sounds like a good idea to me too. And I agree with Jacques that we
should strive to maintain the same version in all the active release
It sounds like a good idea to me too. And I agree with Jacques that we
should strive to maintain the same version in all the active release
branches 13.07, 14.12, 15.12.
Jacopo
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Deepak Dixit <
deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> No Jacques there is not
No Jacques there is not specific reason for this, I generally prefer to
backport changes to most recent/active branches. Just to avoid conflicts I
skip 13.07 most of the time :)
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
That sounds like a good idea to me Deepak, and then why not R13.07?
I though noticed that Pierre Smits suggested to not backport in earlier
releases branches than R15.12. Pierre is there a special reason with that?
BTW I noticed that you guys at HW are not backporting much in R13.07, is there
Hi Jacques,
I think it would be useful to backport this to 14.12 releases.In this way
we will have less tomcat revisions to keep an eye on for vulnerability
fixes, and we will specialize in one version only so that our upgrade
effort will be smaller.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
