I reverted it with r1824889
It was put in with r1811430 and it was my bad to no see that when it was
automatically merged
I must agree I'm too much committed. And last day was a misery for me.
Jacques
Le 20/02/2018 à 05:09, Scott Gray a écrit :
Jacques, as a first step, please consider not
Jacques, as a first step, please consider not using "no functional change"
any longer. It used to be that it was simply used for basic formatting
fixes, but now that I look closer, I notice you've had a trend going for a
while now that you're using it for anything you consider to be minor.
Example
Jacques,
I won't correct you commit messages. This is a repeating issue.
From now on, we will just not include those commits in the blog dev
details.
Am 19.02.18 um 22:07 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Please Michael,
I had a very rude day, we are a team, if you fill it needs a log
change please
Please Michael,
I had a very rude day, we are a team, if you fill it needs a log change please
do
Thanks
Jacques
Le 19/02/2018 à 20:59, Michael Brohl a écrit :
So this is a bugfix and should read "Fixed: ..."
*sigh*
Am 19.02.18 um 20:43 schrieb jler...@apache.org:
Author: jleroux
Date:
