Re: svn commit: r726837 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/script/org/ofbiz/product/inventory/StockMoveServices.xml

2008-12-16 Thread Adam Heath
David E Jones wrote: IFF you can find a fix in the Java code. Because of the way UEL interprets things I don't think that will be possible. Like I explained IGNORING the error doesn't make it go away, it just causes a bigger problem by hiding the problem. If there is a general way to

Re: svn commit: r726837 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/script/org/ofbiz/product/inventory/StockMoveServices.xml

2008-12-16 Thread Adrian Crum
By the way, I'm still working on this. I hope to have something committed by the end of Wednesday. -Adrian Adam Heath wrote: David E Jones wrote: IFF you can find a fix in the Java code. Because of the way UEL interprets things I don't think that will be possible. Like I explained IGNORING

Re: svn commit: r726837 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/script/org/ofbiz/product/inventory/StockMoveServices.xml

2008-12-15 Thread Adrian Crum
I was planning on fixing this in the Java code. Be patient! ;-) -Adrian jone...@apache.org wrote: Author: jonesde Date: Mon Dec 15 14:08:31 2008 New Revision: 726837 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726837view=rev Log: Fixed issue with ambiguous syntax using the new UEL stuff and in this

Re: svn commit: r726837 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/script/org/ofbiz/product/inventory/StockMoveServices.xml

2008-12-15 Thread David E Jones
IFF you can find a fix in the Java code. Because of the way UEL interprets things I don't think that will be possible. Like I explained IGNORING the error doesn't make it go away, it just causes a bigger problem by hiding the problem. If there is a general way to actually handle this, ie