Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-02-01 Thread Scott Gray
I would really like to see some resolution or opinions from others on this, maybe I'm wrong in my thinking but if I'm not then I don't like giving our prospective users bad demo data to learn from. Regards Scott On 31/01/2010, at 1:02 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: On Jan 31, 2010, at 9:41 AM,

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-02-01 Thread Hans Bakker
We are looking into this to move all orders to the productstore 9000 store. We need to be able to group sales channels which we will implement in the next week or so. Regards, Hans On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 21:45 -0800, Scott Gray wrote: I would really like to see some resolution or opinions from

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-02-01 Thread Scott Gray
Thanks Hans, I appreciate you taking the time to get this resolved. Regards Scott On 1/02/2010, at 10:14 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: We are looking into this to move all orders to the productstore 9000 store. We need to be able to group sales channels which we will implement in the next week or

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-31 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Hans, A Sales Channel has nothing to do with what store the sale came in through, it's about what sales channel it arrived from. The OrderHeader contains the productStoreId so what additional information are your able to derive by having a separate enumeration which also signifies the

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-31 Thread Hans Bakker
It Was a customer requirement to see in the sales chanel of it was b2b or b2c On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 00:03 -0800, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Hans, A Sales Channel has nothing to do with what store the sale came in through, it's about what sales channel it arrived from. The OrderHeader contains

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-31 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Jan 31, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: It Was a customer requirement to see in the sales chanel of it was b2b or b2c I could write a book with all the weird requests I have received from customers. The difficult role of an analysis/consultant is to try to convince the customer to

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-30 Thread Hans Bakker
I am sorry Scott i do not agree with you. Our customers like to know if he sale is to end consumer or business. Regards, Hans On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:17 -0700, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Hans, The Sales Channel Enumerations below are incorrect, they shouldn't be tied to specific ProductStores

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-29 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Hans, The Sales Channel Enumerations below are incorrect, they shouldn't be tied to specific ProductStores such as B2C eBay Australia Channel it should simply be eBay Australia Channel since the ProductStore information is already retrievable from the order. I think these serve as a bad

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-27 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Matthieu, my guess is that you used the new store when you started the order entry. Cheers, Jacopo On Jan 27, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: In this commit we did not delete any shipment methods. We only deleted orders with shipment methods, we added a couple of weeks earlier...

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-27 Thread Matthieu Bollot
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 09:31 +0700, Hans Bakker a écrit : In this commit we did not delete any shipment methods. We only deleted orders with shipment methods, we added a couple of weeks earlier... the current shipment methods you can find in: DemoShipping.xml (7 matches) including

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-27 Thread Matthieu Bollot
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 10:14 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : Matthieu, my guess is that you used the new store when you started the order entry. Good guess, thanks. -- Matthieu BOLLOT www.nereide.biz

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-27 Thread Adam Heath
Hans Bakker wrote: In this commit we did not delete any shipment methods. We only deleted orders with shipment methods, we added a couple of weeks earlier... So? If someone suspects an error, don't just attempt to explain it, saying it isn't possible(which is what you imply). Try to see if it

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-27 Thread Hans Bakker
Thanks for sharing your alternative point of view. On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 11:20 -0600, Adam Heath wrote: Hans Bakker wrote: In this commit we did not delete any shipment methods. We only deleted orders with shipment methods, we added a couple of weeks earlier... So? If someone suspects an

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-26 Thread Matthieu Bollot
Hi hans and all, While creating an order, for shipment method I've got « Use Default: No other shipping methods available.» I don't remember which methods were there but at least there was «UPS next day» So, it seems that some DemoData have disappeared. cheers, Le lundi 25 janvier 2010 à 07:23

Re: svn commit: r902719 [2/6] - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: ./ data/ data/helpdata/ entitydef/ script/org/ofbiz/order/olap/ script/org/ofbiz/order/reports/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/orde

2010-01-26 Thread Hans Bakker
In this commit we did not delete any shipment methods. We only deleted orders with shipment methods, we added a couple of weeks earlier... the current shipment methods you can find in: DemoShipping.xml (7 matches) including NEXT_DAY Regards, Hans On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:34 +0100, Matthieu