Le 05/04/2018 à 13:25, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 05/04/2018 à 11:49, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Hmm, I see no problem in example being a plugin. Just because it's a
plugin doesn't mean it lost its value or purpose (to give people
examples). So sounds good by me to add such fields to the
Le 05/04/2018 à 11:49, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Hmm, I see no problem in example being a plugin. Just because it's a
plugin doesn't mean it lost its value or purpose (to give people
examples). So sounds good by me to add such fields to the example
component.
Just that people using OFBiz
Hmm, I see no problem in example being a plugin. Just because it's a
plugin doesn't mean it lost its value or purpose (to give people
examples). So sounds good by me to add such fields to the example
component.
In fact, I would suggest that not only add them, but show the users
how to view the
I'm not sure about Example component, it's now a plugin...
Maybe having an example in Entity component for the test is enough?
Also there is the auto-completion from XSD
But anyway not against Example component
Jacques
Le 05/04/2018 à 11:36, Rishi Solanki a écrit :
+1 for removal.
+1 to
+1 for removal.
+1 to Scott for having an example in the system ... Example entities seems
right place as mentioned.
Rishi Solanki
Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
www.hotwax.co
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:38
It would be good to leave it on somewhere in the system like the example
entities maybe
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 22:13 Jacques Le Roux,
wrote:
> Le 04/04/2018 à 12:07, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
> > I'm not sure about the field in the entity component though! it
> >
Le 04/04/2018 à 12:07, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
I'm not sure about the field in the entity component though! it
might be needed in some unit tests?
Yes
Jacques
+1 to their removal. A quick grep lists the fields which have that
flag. I'm not sure about the field in the entity component though! it
might be needed in some unit tests?
framework/entity/entitydef/entitymodel_test.xml:
applications/datamodel/entitydef/order-entitymodel.xml:
Hi,
Thanks Nicolas to point to this issue.
I also think that this attribute should be used only for technical
purpose, not for functional purposes.
Pierre
On 04/04/2018 08:54, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
Moving this discussion from user ML
I agree Nicolas, I see no reasons to OOTB enable
Hi,
Moving this discussion from user ML
I agree Nicolas, I see no reasons to OOTB enable audit log in any of the fields which currently supports it. Not sure if we need to go with extending
entities.
Note: the only entities concerned are OrderItem, OrderItemShipGroup, ReturnItem
Jacques
10 matches
Mail list logo