Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

I'm all for that. Using ecomseo instead of ecommerce, I mean. But when I proposed so, Anil refused and I went with this solution. For details see https://s.apache.org/UVqw Actually as a diff between the 2 web.xml files shows there are also a bunch of other changes with the new filters and

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Inline... Le 24/09/2016 à 06:20, Scott Gray a écrit : You're asking for opinions and I can't give one without any knowledge of this feature so I'm simply telling you that the lack of documentation is a hindrance to evaluation and adoption. I took a quick look at SeoConfig.xml and have no idea

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

I have to agree with Scott, the approach here is wrong in my opinion. My definition of mess is simple: you should not have two components with two webapps. A real root solution is to unify the ecommerce component with one webapp exposed instead of having all this hairy code and interdependencies.

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Small correction, I meant one component with two webapps On Jan 24, 2017 11:21 PM, "Taher Alkhateeb" wrote: > I have to agree with Scott, the approach here is wrong in my opinion. My > definition of mess is simple: you should not have two components with two >

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Jacques, I must say that I don't like this action. I have re-read the discussion you had with Scott about this subject and also briefly read the discussions in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5312 (huge!). There were strong objections against this change. I must say the

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Scott, I did not answer clearly to this question (inline) Le 22/09/2016 à 13:22, Scott Gray a écrit : This mostly to somehow battle test it, even if I know it works well So does it need battle testing or does it work well? Have you deployed it to any production instances? Has anyone else?

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Le 23/09/2016 à 01:15, Scott Gray a écrit : Well for me it's a -1 until I hear some positive reviews from other users (and ideally committers). I think Christian (G/eisert/ ) can tell you more about the buchhandel.de site. I don't like having two ecommerce webapps and my preference would be

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

+1. SEO is very important for ecommerce websites. When I implemented it, Jonathan Schikowski offered me many principles of SEO, it's not a function only, it's more a protocol OFBiz talks with a search engine. I think setting ecomseo as default entrance of ecommerce will more users know OFBiz

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Michael, Le 24/01/2017 à 22:21, Michael Brohl a écrit : Jacques, I must say that I don't like this action. I have re-read the discussion you had with Scott about this subject and also briefly read the discussions in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5312 (huge!). There were

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

This argument looks more like a witch hunt to me. If you both think it's a valid argument against ecomseo then what about accounting, ar and ap webapps in accounting component ofbizsetup and ordermgr-js webapps in commonext component content and contentimages in content component marketing

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbiz-trunk

Hi Jinghai, You are welcome, I'll have a look ASAP (not right now, I must move) Cheers Jacques PS: No worries, it works here (locally on Win7) so it's a Builbot hiccup, I'll check that Le 25/01/2017 à 04:59, Shi Jinghai a écrit : Hmm, I read the log and found some errors. I don't know

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Hi Jacques, I think you might be mixing up "multiple webapps" with "duplicate / entangled webapps" in your examples. Yes we probably have other things to get rid of, but I think we should avoid working in the direction of increasing the entanglements instead of fixing root causes. Also I don't

Ecomseo specifications

Hi Jonathan, Maybe you can help me explain the OFBiz community the specs of ecomseo, which is the improved OFBiz ecommerce version you helped to contribute with ilscipio, and why it's better? The demos at http://ofbiz.apache.org/ show the 2 cases. The stable demo is using the old way when

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Thanks Jinghai! Happy you referred to Jonathan, I was then just asking him some help here :) Jacques Le 25/01/2017 à 02:30, Shi Jinghai a écrit : +1. SEO is very important for ecommerce websites. When I implemented it, Jonathan Schikowski offered me many principles of SEO, it's not a

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Le 25/01/2017 à 03:56, Paul Foxworthy a écrit : On 25 January 2017 at 07:12, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I guess you know that most of the spiders bots which are crawling the web are not doing for the good of websites and users. Better to prevent them to hurt in any

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

Hi Jacques, please see inline: On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > This argument looks more like a witch hunt to me. > [...] > BTW, I don't see good practises in Hans's and Anil's answers > [...] > Since then ilscipio has its fork[4][5]

Re: Use ecomseo on demo rather than ecommerce

On 25 January 2017 at 07:12, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > I guess you know that most of the spiders bots which are crawling the web > are not doing for the good of websites and users. Better to prevent them to > hurt in any way. OOTB the ecomseo webapp is better than

buildbot failure in on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1861 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbiz-trunk

Hmm, I read the log and found some errors. I don't know how to resolve these problems. This error is the first one and I guess it causes other errors: Jan 25, 2017 3:14:06 AM org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol init SEVERE: Failed to initialize end point associated with ProtocolHandler

Re: User Acceptance Test Cases For Ecommerce 14.12

Thanks Rishi, Indeed I needed a clarification, sorry for that. It's a great initiative, OFBiz will then really be at professional standards, and that's great! I agree that we have first to create and document these UAT and then think about a tool to run them. Cucumber seems the best tool for