[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3274:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-3274 DecoratorSectionLayout.patch
An updated patch to be used with the latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783578#action_12783578
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3274:
Hi Bruno,
About leftonly-larger, yes it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783580#action_12783580
]
Mridul Pathak commented on OFBIZ-3244:
--
I believe that *uploadAdditionalViewImages*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reopened OFBIZ-3244:
Yes Mridul. You are correct.
We should provide the patch for this enhancement ASAP.
Thanks Tim,
So you chose to not keep the site page opened, why not indeed.
BTW this is maybe biased by my FireFox tuning (I open a new tab when I switch
to a new domain)
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
All done and posted up - will update within 30 minutes.
Cheers,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783585#action_12783585
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3244:
Thanks Ashish,
And thank you Mridul for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mridul Pathak updated OFBIZ-3244:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ_3244.patch
Here is the patch for this improvement, Ashish.
New feature to
see inline.
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 01:17 +0100, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
First thanks to all who put effort in the community infrastructure,
invaluable for the project!
I agree on moving to a single space and make it more structured and
accessible for (potential) Ofbiz users. I was not
Please devs, don't forget to add your changes in Main New features with a short
explanation
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+features
Thanks
Jacques
Hi Hans,
As David explained, you should create an account on cwiki (I recommend using the same username than on Contegix server) and ask
David for the permissions you had before
Jacques
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
I tried the
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
Should we have this list as Latest enhancements on the
http://ofbiz.apache.org/ front page?
This sounds like a good idea to me
secondly, now this is system on the apache infrastructure didn't the url
change?
Right, I did not notice when I
Error appears on order detail page : While depressing view/edit delivery
schedule info button
-
Key: OFBIZ-3276
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3276
Moreover I don't think we will refactor all the documentation now that we have
a workaround to search in all spaces at a time.
Of course if you are ready to help restructuring the documentation this would
be much appreciated...
There is still this an issue when searching in OFBIZ space (for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Parimal Gain updated OFBIZ-3276:
Attachment: OFBIZ-3276.patch
Attached patch of related changes.
Error appears on order detail
Thanks Sam,
From: Sam Hamilton s...@sh81.com
Hey Guys - just wondering if you guys had thought about 301 redirecting from the old wiki to the new wiki as I am sure there are a
bunch of links out there that point to the old urls?
Yes we have plenty of it :(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3276:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
Error appears on order detail page : While
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3276.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Parimal - Done at r885393.
--
Ashish Vijaywargiya
Error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3270:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
Financial Account Transaction - Enhance Deposit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783635#action_12783635
]
Jens Falsmar Oechsler commented on OFBIZ-3175:
--
How about the various ftl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3270.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Parimal - Done at r885403.
--
Ashish
Financial Account
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3269:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
Reconciliation Screen Enhancements.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3269.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Sumit Awdesh for the contribution - Done at r885409.
--
Hey OFBiz community
I am do a master thesis, with the title “User Driven Innovation in the
ecosystem around the Open Source ERP system Apache OFBiz”.
For the thesis, I will collect information from the mailing lists, issue
tracker and subversion repository. I will e.g try to track an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3244.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Mridul for the contribution - Done at r885414.
--
Ashish
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3244:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya (was: Jacques Le Roux)
New feature to upload
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3249.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Arun for the contribution - Done at r885425.
--
Ashish
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783662#action_12783662
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3175:
Hi Jens,
this is not a silly question.
I did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3175:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-3175 FtlWidgetsMacros.patch
The icon used for accessing the lookups should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Divesh Dutta updated OFBIZ-3275:
Attachment: OFBIZ-3275.patch
Here is the new patch with length of foreign key name less than 18 as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rishi Solanki closed OFBIZ-3267.
Resolution: Fixed
Duplicate of OFBIZ-3249.
Thanks Ashish and Arun for the fix.
Product
Hi Jacques,
Having a look on what google has indexed of docs.ofbiz.org there are
7,710 pages / links that might need redirecting to the new site (depends
what you guys think are critical?).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783668#action_12783668
]
Albert Mayo commented on OFBIZ-3253:
At step 1 in the issue description you have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783678#action_12783678
]
Albert Mayo commented on OFBIZ-3268:
Since I provided a patch from a local repository,
it would be almost impossible since we used tiny URLs to do much of
the external linking and those all changed. As for the others - I'll
put something in place that does:
/OFBIZ/* - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/OFBIZ/*
and the same for the other spaces. If someone knows those
Thanks Sam - I'll dig in on this today and we'll be in a better place
because of it.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Hi Jacques,
Having a look on what google has indexed
I don't think we should do it that way Jacques - and here's why:
1. The nav allows you to get back right to where it was.
2. Once the theme is reintegrated on the Wiki - it will act like it's
all one site again.
3. Poping up windows is almost always a bad idea.
If you think that it needs to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783694#action_12783694
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3268:
No, just hat it's harder to fix. Could you
Tim,
Yes you are totally right. As I already tried to explain (but badly I must
confess) it was more a confusion with this feature I have
set in Firefox. Because it opens a new tab in Firefox. So please forget it.
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
I don't think we should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3193.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
Fixed at revision 885370
Dividing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783794#action_12783794
]
Albert Mayo commented on OFBIZ-3268:
Unfortunately, I do not have the time to properly
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
-Adrian
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Sun Nov 29 21:32:36 2009
New Revision: 885277
URL:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
What? You made the ofbiz demo data loading code multi-threaded?
Seriously? If so, that rocks!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783850#action_12783850
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3275:
---
For both of these entities I have not seen the
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz
going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on
Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka
Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk
+1
Marco
Il giorno 30/nov/2009, alle ore 22.40, David E Jones ha scritto:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that
relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no
David E Jones wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that
relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on
Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 30, 2009, at 2:40 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java
1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
What? You made the ofbiz demo data loading code multi-threaded?
Seriously? If so, that rocks!
I
+1
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz
going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on
Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka
Java 1.5). Note that
+1
-Al
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that
relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer
+1
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 1/12/2009, at 10:40 AM, David E Jones wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java
1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would
allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
What? You made the ofbiz demo data loading code multi-threaded?
Seriously? If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783866#action_12783866
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3268:
Yes it is, just that there are other
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
What? You made the ofbiz demo data loading code
+1
Jacques
From: David E Jones d...@me.com
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would
allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
What? You made the ofbiz demo data loading code multi-threaded?
Seriously? If
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
What? You made the ofbiz demo data loading code
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
What? You made the ofbiz demo data loading code
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3 minutes to
1.5 minutes.
What? You made the ofbiz
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
multi-thread the demo data loading code. I got it down from 3
minutes to
1.5 minutes.
+1
Hans
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:40 -0700, David E Jones wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that
relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on
First of all: a great job you are doing moving confluence to the apache
infrastructure
i found a problem this morning by doing a search from the ofbiz home
page:
com.atlassian.bonnie.LuceneException:
java.io.FileNotFoundException:
Thanks Adrian,
Now I see the issue
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
The java.util.concurrent package rocks! I used it a few weeks ago to
We've discussed in passing a couple of times now the possibility of
allowing users to save their searches/finds in order to allow them to
quickly perform the search again in the future. I'd like to get this
implemented in the very near future and since there have been a few
different
+1
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/apache-ofbiz-blog/
On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:40 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
OFBiz going forward. This basically means
+1
--
Ashish
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:10 AM, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that
relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784081#action_12784081
]
Rishi Solanki commented on OFBIZ-2000:
--
Hey Jacques,
This issue is waiting for your
Hi Scott,
this is on my list also.
This is how I did imagine it:
**UI:
In the search options screenlet of the FindScreenDecorator:
- a drop-down apperars if one or more saved search are available for
that search. If the user selects one of the options all the search
fields get populated
Problem in the createUpdateBillingAddress service.
--
Key: OFBIZ-3277
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3277
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-3277:
Attachment: OFBIZ-3277.patch
Here is the patch for this issue.
Thanks to Rishi Solanki for
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, comments inline.
On 1/12/2009, at 7:30 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
Hi Scott,
this is on my list also.
This is how I did imagine it:
**UI:
In the search options screenlet of the FindScreenDecorator:
This is interesting, how do you plan on presenting the
hi Bruno,
Thanks for your reply. I wish I could make it by myself. However, it turns
out too challenging for me. I think it is more piratical if one or more
committer could lead the overall process.
At this moment, what I can suggest is that the current big ofbiz might need
to be split into sub
+1
Thanks, Manuel.
On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:40 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java
1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would
allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those
OFBiz would no longer
+ 1
--
Erwan
Hi Sott.
can you help?
You brought up the licensing concerns. We tried to talk to the licensing
people at Eclipse and i am trying to solve a licensing problem as a
middleman i do not understand.
Could you please clarify with the people at lice...@eclipse.org and in
particular
Improvement in Cybersource integration to better handle a sale transaction
response
---
Key: OFBIZ-3278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3278
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pranay Pandey updated OFBIZ-3278:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3278.patch
Here is the patch for this improvement.
Improvement in
+1
David E Jones a écrit :
Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz
going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on
Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka
Java 1.5). Note that this
Hi Hans,
I can try to help but I'm not sure I understand, nothing is in
question on the Eclipse side, birt is licensed EPL end of story,
asking them to change their license would be like someone asking us to
change ours. The issue we're facing is compatibility of the ASL with
the EPL
79 matches
Mail list logo
