Re: entity-auto and cancel operation

What about 'expire'? Seems also appropriate. Best regards, Pierre Op zaterdag 6 februari 2016 heeft Julien NICOLAS het volgende geschreven: > I like the idea, when we call delete I imagine that the data is deleted > from the database. > > As Gil said, cancel is not

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15135988#comment-15135988 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6882: - I don't really care how it will be named when it goes into the

Re: entity-auto and cancel operation

Like pierre suggested, we could call it: endDate or delimit or expire On Feb 6, 2016 2:54 PM, "Pierre Smits" wrote: > What about 'expire'? Seems also appropriate. > > Best regards, > > Pierre > > Op zaterdag 6 februari 2016 heeft Julien NICOLAS < >

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15135985#comment-15135985 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6882: - Why? Should we not leave that choice to the implementers? >

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15135984#comment-15135984 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6882: - Feel free to create a follow-up JIRA issue to involve the

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6733) Error with Service Product Invoice Lines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6733: --- Fix Version/s: Upcoming Branch 13.07.03 12.04.06

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-6733) Error with Service Product Invoice Lines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-6733. -- > Error with Service Product Invoice Lines > > >

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6733) Error with Service Product Invoice Lines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15136017#comment-15136017 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6733: Trunk r1720883 R14.12 r1722261 R13.04 r1722264 > Error

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15135696#comment-15135696 ] Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-6882: -- I agree to extend the postalAddress entity but the

entity-auto and cancel operation

Hi guys, During the simple crud service to entity-auto, I detect the remove(Entity) service that didn't remove the generic value from the data base put only set the field thruDate to now. I think this operation isn't in coherence with the service name, yes generally the operation is logical

Re: entity-auto and cancel operation

I like the idea, when we call delete I imagine that the data is deleted from the database. As Gil said, cancel is not the word, close seems better. But, what's happen if I call delete ? Do you plan to delete all dependent entity ? Julien. Le 06/02/2016 17:09, gil portenseigne a écrit :

Re: entity-auto and cancel operation

Hi, I'd propose "close", for closing de period where the data was active... But i'm not sure if this is not going too far, the algorithm beneath is not quite simple to be an auto thing. When i develop i would prefer only updating my GV after setting my closing date. What do you think ? Gil

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4645) creates links without jsessionid for users who have cookies disabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4645. -- Resolution: Not A Problem Assignee: Jacques Le Roux After the last work at OFBIZ-6867,

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15135708#comment-15135708 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6882: It's not clear to me if this field should be name

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15135697#comment-15135697 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6882: Should these fields be mandatory OOTB? > Extend the

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15135701#comment-15135701 ] Nicolas Malin edited comment on OFBIZ-6882 at 2/6/16 9:29 AM: -- I think yes, I

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15135701#comment-15135701 ] Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-6882: -- I think yes, I haven't problem to don't see/edit all *GeoId

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6849) Use only HTTPS in OFBiz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6849: --- Description: I recently (~4 weeks ago) started the ["Performance over security, is that