[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rahul Bhooteshwar updated OFBIZ-7006:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-7006-trunk.patch
OFBIZ-7006-14.12.patch
Rahul Bhooteshwar created OFBIZ-7006:
Summary: Cache Maintenance action links UI improvement
Key: OFBIZ-7006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7006
Project: OFBiz
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244018#comment-15244018
]
Rahul Singh commented on OFBIZ-6900:
Hi Pierre, did you get chance to look into this issue?
> EFT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242458#comment-15242458
]
Swapnil Shah edited comment on OFBIZ-6964 at 4/16/16 5:04 AM:
--
Thanks for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242458#comment-15242458
]
Swapnil Shah edited comment on OFBIZ-6964 at 4/16/16 5:01 AM:
--
Thanks for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15243514#comment-15243514
]
Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-6662:
--
Hi Jacques,
sorry, I have noticed but had not the time to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15243313#comment-15243313
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5744:
Actually there is more than that, see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15243153#comment-15243153
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6915:
Hi Chatree,
I did not notice then but you added
{quote}
Please create a Jira and attach a patch. We will then see if we agree about putting them there, seems the right place to me if they are generic
enough, thanks!
Jacques
Le 15/04/2016 15:06, Shrenik Bhura a écrit :
These scripts are quite generic and can be used by any OFBiz deployment using AWS
These scripts are quite generic and can be used by any OFBiz deployment using
AWS EC2 and S3 storage as backup. Hence thought tools/aws under OFBiz root would
also be an apt place. If someone customises them then they can take it under
hot-deploy.
If I am not wrong, it's about keeping these in repository along with
project for which these backup scripts are prepared.
If yes, then IMO can be kept in your hot-deploy project under directory as
mentioned i.e. tools/aws.
Best regards,
Pranay Pandey
HotWax Systems
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
Could they go under tools/aws ?
On 15-04-2016 18:01, Shrenik Bhura wrote:
Hi,
I want to store some AWS specific backup scripts for ofbiz as well as postgres
database under the ofbiz file system tree. These scripts can then be setup as
cronjobs.
What is the best place to do so or is it wrong
Hi,
I want to store some AWS specific backup scripts for ofbiz as well as postgres
database under the ofbiz file system tree. These scripts can then be setup as
cronjobs.
What is the best place to do so or is it wrong to do so?
Intent is to start something like a backup tool-set for ofbiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242838#comment-15242838
]
Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-6497:
--
yes I found a conflict between tka and pdfbox to realize unit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242814#comment-15242814
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6497:
Hi Nicolas, it seems we did not take care of the pdfbox
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15242586#comment-15242586
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-7005:
Thanks Nicolas, indeed same issue, closed.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-7005.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> webtools/control/WebtoolsLayoutDemoFop breaks
>
Hi Nicolas,
I have to note that in ModelPermission the same exact call is also made
with a new transaction. I did not dig deep into it but I advice to at least
check it over there as well. This makes me suspect that either both call
are wrong or both calls are right.
HTH
Taher Alkhateeb
On
Hi Nicolas,
Calling it as permission service is tricky. I see the comment in
implementation above the simple method in ShipmentServices.xml-
It was implemented with a purpose to be called inline, may be supporting
the traditional way of doing things. Reviewing at a complete patch with all
19 matches
Mail list logo
