Re: svn commit: r1781109 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/minilang/ledger/GeneralLedgerServices. xml

Hi Jacopo, Is it no related with a Jira? Since it's a functional change I think it would be better. Thanks Jacques Le 31/01/2017 à 16:43, jaco...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jacopoc Date: Tue Jan 31 15:43:46 2017 New Revision: 1781109 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1781109=rev

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbiz-branch14

Great, thanks Nicolas! Jacques Le 31/01/2017 à 21:12, Nicolas Malin a écrit : Ok I found it, it's corrected on revision r1781161. It's came from a HashMap that don't keep the given order for list Pattern regexp. Replace HashMap by LinkedHashMap solve this. Nicolas Le 30/01/2017 à 09:01,

buildbot success in on ofbiz-branch14

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-branch14 while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch14/builds/331 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbiz-branch14

Ok I found it, it's corrected on revision r1781161. It's came from a HashMap that don't keep the given order for list Pattern regexp. Replace HashMap by LinkedHashMap solve this. Nicolas Le 30/01/2017 à 09:01, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Thanks Nicolas, Yes, it's only this test failing and

Re: Proposal to create a separate svn repository for the OFBiz official plugins

Thanks Taher, Jacques Le 31/01/2017 à 15:12, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : The plugins are already published as zip archives in the implementation On Jan 31, 2017 5:09 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote: Hi Jinghai, Taher, Taher, what do you think agout Jinghais

Re: Proposal to create a separate svn repository for the OFBiz official plugins

The plugins are already published as zip archives in the implementation On Jan 31, 2017 5:09 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote: > Hi Jinghai, Taher, > > Taher, what do you think agout Jinghais proposition? > > Jinghai, if nobody opposes the idea, would you mind creating

Re: Proposal to create a separate svn repository for the OFBiz official plugins

Hi Jinghai, Taher, Taher, what do you think agout Jinghais proposition? Jinghai, if nobody opposes the idea, would you mind creating a Jira? Thanks Jacques Le 13/01/2017 à 11:09, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : That's an interesting proposition ans should be considered indeed Thanks Jinghai

Re: Rename specialpurpose components in Jira

OK cool - nice and simple. That's +1 from me! Thanks Sharan On 31/01/17 13:30, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Yep Jacques Le 31/01/2017 à 12:39, Sharan Foga a écrit : So do you mean instead of 'specialpurpose/birt' just 'birt' ? On 31/01/17 11:54, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Sharan, Yes you

Re: Rename specialpurpose components in Jira

Yep Jacques Le 31/01/2017 à 12:39, Sharan Foga a écrit : So do you mean instead of 'specialpurpose/birt' just 'birt' ? On 31/01/17 11:54, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Sharan, Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good idea for UX. I suggest that we remove the

Re: Rename specialpurpose components in Jira

So do you mean instead of 'specialpurpose/birt' just 'birt' ? On 31/01/17 11:54, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Sharan, Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good idea for UX. I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and specialpurpose), et voilà :)

Re: Rename specialpurpose components in Jira

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Sharan, > > Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good idea > for UX. > > I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and > specialpurpose), et voilà :) > > Agreed

Re: Rename specialpurpose components in Jira

Hi Sharan, Yes you are right, but having tons of components is maybe not a good idea for UX. I suggest that we remove the prefix/es (either plugins or/and specialpurpose), et voilà :) Agreed all? Jacques Le 31/01/2017 à 11:13, Sharan Foga a écrit : Hi Jacques Aren't we going to need

Re: Rename specialpurpose components in Jira

Hi Jacques Aren't we going to need them both active at the same time ? (so am not sure if a simple rename will work.) Thanks Sharan On 2017-01-30 21:49 (+0100), Jacques Le Roux wrote: > HI, > > While doing some Jiras I thought that, after last Taher's work on