[Site] things to clean up or improve

Hi, This is mostly a reminder for all of us. Feel free to add the points you may have found too, I have certainly missed some... 1. Googling for "site:ofbiz.apache.org security license" Add a link from the license word (footer only it seems) to |http://www.apache.org/licenses/ |as requested

Re: Groovy future with Java 9

Mmm, I have to re-read that, but finally the concern seems serious and seems to come from here http://markmail.org/message/zzhlqsr6tvkjbpyz Jacques Le 28/09/2017 à 21:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Thanks Taher, Yes I feel reassured. When I saw this tweet from Cedric, I wondered if somethin

Re: Groovy future with Java 9

Thanks Taher, Yes I feel reassured. When I saw this tweet from Cedric, I wondered if something important was not missing. But now I think there is nothing really blocking :) Let's see Jacques Le 28/09/2017 à 20:34, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : I think we'll be just fine. Plenty of support tim

Re: Groovy future with Java 9

Thanks Deepak, I missed this one and will read it carefully Jacques Le 28/09/2017 à 19:34, Deepak Dixit a écrit : http://markmail.org/message/kh7hcqpcflqjs534 Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Deepak Dixit < deepak.di...@h

Re: Groovy future with Java 9

I think we'll be just fine. Plenty of support time for Java 8 which gives the Groovy project time to iron out all kinks in deploying on Java 9. Worst case scenario might be some binary incompatibility which means the need to recompile. So what! On Sep 28, 2017 8:34 PM, "Deepak Dixit" wrote: > ht

Re: Groovy future with Java 9

http://markmail.org/message/kh7hcqpcflqjs534 Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Deepak Dixit < deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > I think they are aware > > http://markmail.org/message/du6kraodfsjxcots > http://markmail.or

Re: Groovy future with Java 9

I think they are aware http://markmail.org/message/du6kraodfsjxcots http://markmail.org/message/d4t2hkykuhydt2vo Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > No thanks :) > > This i

Re: Groovy future with Java 9

No thanks :) This is a bit reassuring https://twitter.com/paulk_asert/status/913375910723600385 But I wonder why nobody speaks about "Groovy future with Java 9" in Groovy MLs. Did I miss it? Jacques Le 28/09/2017 à 16:03, Blockfreight™ | Julian Smith a écrit : Port to Golang. 😂😂. #notasma

Re: Groovy future with Java 9

Port to Golang. 😂😂. #notasmalljob. On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 at 11:54 pm, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > A bad news, knowing who is Cedric Champeau[1]: Software Engineer @Gradle, > Inc. Conference speaker. Wrote the static compiler for @ApacheGroovy. > Co-author of #G

Groovy future with Java 9

Hi, A bad news, knowing who is Cedric Champeau[1]: Software Engineer @Gradle, Inc. Conference speaker. Wrote the static compiler for @ApacheGroovy. Co-author of #GroovyInAction Opinions are my own. We can't ignore that https://twitter.com/CedricChampeau/status/913334345322156032: "Let me tell

Re: Security group permission association must have date range

+1 Suraj! - Best Regards, Swapnil M Mane On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Suraj Khurana < suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello, > > There might be many scenarios in the real business that you need to > maintain specific permission to a specific group for some specified time > only.

Re: Security group permission association must have date range

+1 Suraj -- Thanks & Regards --- Arun Patidar Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. www.hotwaxsystems.com On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya < ashish.vijaywarg...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 > > Kind Regards > Ashish Vijaywargiya > HotWax Syste

Re: Security group permission association must have date range

+1 Kind Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya HotWax Systems - est. 1997 On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Suraj Khurana < suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello, > > There might be many scenarios in the real business that you need to > maintain specific permission

Re: Security group permission association must have date range

+1 Suraj! Rishi Solanki Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Suraj, > > I see no reasons why we could no

Re: Security group permission association must have date range

Hi Suraj, I see no reasons why we could not add them Of course an update of https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Revisions+Requiring+Data+Migration+-+upgrade+ofbiz would be necessary Jacques Le 28/09/2017 à 10:05, Suraj Khurana a écrit : Hello, There might be many scenarios i

Security group permission association must have date range

Hello, There might be many scenarios in the real business that you need to maintain specific permission to a specific group for some specified time only. Like at the time of business expansion, permission related work allotment to current employees, so maintaining history becomes important here.