Hi Thanh,
The permissions you are looking for and corresponding security group are
already available OOTB. You only need to associate user login with
appropriate security groups. Following entities can be of your interest:
1) SecurityPermission
2) SecurityGroup
3) SecurityGroupPermission
4) UserL
Hi Thanh,
Your message has been moderated.
Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email
client
See also why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
You will get a better support , it's more fair to share with everybody and
people can answer you directly
Hi all,
I am newbie in ofbiz,
I want to create permission call "Salesman", which this permission, user can
create sale order, view and edit own sale order. Cannot update or view other
sale order which is not belong to themself.
How can I do it, please show me.
Thanks and best regards.
Thanh
+1 for Taher's suggestion.
Thanks, Michael
Am 28.02.19 um 12:32 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb:
Perhaps we can keep ofbiz 17.12 on java 8, and let 18.12 and trunk
switch to java 11 on openjdk. This might provide stability expected by
users as indicated by Michael.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:27 PM Jacq
Thank you Jacques and Taher for your review and useful comments: I have
committed this work with rev. 1854532.
Taher, I have reviewed the configuration options but I don't feel like
changing any of them by default; for now I have added a comment to the
commit about them and I will leave the implem
Perhaps we can keep ofbiz 17.12 on java 8, and let 18.12 and trunk
switch to java 11 on openjdk. This might provide stability expected by
users as indicated by Michael.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:27 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> During discussions in the "Oracle Java release model changes
Hi,
During discussions in the "Oracle Java release model changes and consequences for the project" thread, we created "Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK
Version 11" aka OFBIZ-10757.
There we began to discuss not only if we should switch to Java 11 LTS (Long Time Support), which is obviously the be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-539
Jacques
Le 27/02/2019 à 12:29, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks Mathieu,
Done with https://github.com/apache/commons-dbcp/pull/30
Jacques
Le 26/02/2019 à 12:37, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
Jacques Le Roux writes:
Did you report