Re:

2019-06-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 18/06/2019 à 16:06, thanhnguyen020...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi all, Today I see one problem is Firefox browser does not support this command " Hi Thanh, Your message has been moderated. Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email client See also why here

Re: Reply-to address missing for dev and user mailing list

2019-06-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
BTW, I also receive duplicates from myself when sending to some OFBiz MLs like private or security. I'm eager to set Thunderbird to avoid that :) Le 18/06/2019 à 14:09, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi All, I read all articles and I agree with Mathieu and Paul. Here are my conclusions. TL;DR:

dev@ofbiz.apache.org

2019-06-18 Thread thanhnguyen0202lk
Hi all, Today I see one problem is Firefox browser does not support this command "

Re: Reply-to address missing for dev and user mailing list

2019-06-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi All, I read all articles and I agree with Mathieu and Paul. Here are my conclusions. TL;DR: like Mathieu and Paul said, it's not a list problem it's a sender problem. But the devil is in the details... More about that: I use Reply to list in Thunderbird, because I was forced to do so at

Re: Content of the NOTICE file is not apt

2019-06-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 18/06/2019 à 10:38, Aditya Sharma a écrit : Hi Team, The line in the NOTICE[1] file: *This product includes software developed by* should be *This product includes software developed at* as per the ASF Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy[2]. Though small but it changes the meaning.

Content of the NOTICE file is not apt

2019-06-18 Thread Aditya Sharma
Hi Team, The line in the NOTICE[1] file: *This product includes software developed by* should be *This product includes software developed at* as per the ASF Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy[2]. Though small but it changes the meaning. Should I create a Jira and fix it? 1.

Re: Cookie Consent In E-Coomerce

2019-06-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 15/06/2019 à 11:54, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 31/10/2018 à 16:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : With OFBIZ-10635 I'm currently working on autoUserLoginId cookies. While doing so I spotted that securedLoginId has the same duration (1 year) than autoUserLoginId. I have reduced it to the browser