Re: Releasing 17.12.05, 18.12.01 and freezing R20

2020-12-22 Thread Aditya Sharma
+1 to the initial proposal of release 3 years of support for r17 and 5 years of support starting with r18 sounds good to me. I think we can define a policy well stated on our release page > > with an additional idea: maybe better skip r20 and make a r21 right at > > the beginning of the year

Re: Releasing 17.12.05, 18.12.01 and freezing R20

2020-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 22/12/2020 à 10:08, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : If we don't release R20 it means that we will at best release R21 at the end of 2021, again a lot of years between 2018 and 2021. OK forget it, OK this does not make sense, anyway it will be end of 2021, OK for me for a brand new R21 :) But we

Re: Releasing 17.12.05, 18.12.01 and freezing R20

2020-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Guys, If we don't release R20 it means that we will at best release R21 at the end of 2021, again a lot of years between 2018 and 2021. I think we should release as much as possible, like the tendency is now and we did before. Jacques Le 22/12/2020 à 08:52, Devanshu Vyas a écrit : A big

Re: Releasing 17.12.05, 18.12.01 and freezing R20

2020-12-22 Thread Gil Portenseigne
+1 for Michael ! Cheers On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:57:25PM +0100, Michael Brohl wrote: > +1 for the initial proposal > > with an additional idea: maybe better skip r20 and make a r21 right at the > beginning of the year with the chance to release also in 21. > > This would allow us to catch up