Re: Messaging-System ActiveMQ Performance

2021-09-20 Thread Nicolas Malin
Hello Werner, In your case I suggest to don't use the cache clearing during your process. We already manage a similar case with : * create a delegator dedicate to the process without cache clearing * use this delegator during the process instead the default * call cache clearing at the process

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

2021-09-20 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Nicolas, That's not exactly what I find: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20%3D%2018.12.01 Jacques Le 20/09/2021 à 10:14, Nicolas Malin a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

2021-09-20 Thread Gil Portenseigne
+1 Thanks, Gil On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Nicolas Malin wrote: > The main is on the title :) > > At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide > whether to launch and move them to the next. > > My feeling is after some time on it, we can go ahead and keep

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

2021-09-20 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Jacopo On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:13 AM Nicolas Malin wrote: > > The main is on the title :) > > At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide > whether to launch and move them to the next. > > My feeling is after some time on it, we can go ahead and keep their fix >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

2021-09-20 Thread Nicolas Malin
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12321?jql=resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20%3D%2018.12.01 :D forgot the link On 20/09/2021 10:13, Nicolas Malin wrote: > The main is on the title :) > > At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide >

[DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

2021-09-20 Thread Nicolas Malin
The main is on the title :) At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide whether to launch and move them to the next. My feeling is after some time on it, we can go ahead and keep their fix for the next when it would be possible. Nicolas -- logoNrd