Re: Security alerts on monthly blog entries?

2019-05-02 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Jacopo On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:18 PM Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering: would it not be good to use the blog to alert about > resolved security issues (both w/ and w/o CVE) when it applies? > > Jacques > >

Re: Strong dependency of OFBiz build on JCenter

2019-03-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Just to clarify, I was suggesting that we could add more repositories, not replace Jcenter with another one: the redundancy would mitigate the risk of unavailability. Jacopo On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:07 PM Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > Whatever repository you choose, there is always the risk of

Re: Strong dependency of OFBiz build on JCenter

2019-03-22 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Adding one or more additional repositories in build.gradle (at the moment we have only jcenter()) can be a solution. Jacopo On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:41 AM Swapnil M Mane < swapnil.m...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello team, > > Yesterday JCenter was down for some time, due to which I was

Re: [OPTIONS] Java 11 and Java JDK origin

2019-03-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
I think that the simplest way to convey this message is to edit the README document with a link to OpenJDK rather than Oracle JDK. Jacopo On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:22 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > We should then make clear to our users that they will need to switch

Re: Enabling HTTP/2 in the embedded Tomcat connectors

2019-02-28 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
[1] or whether the defaults are okay. > >> > >> [1] https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/config/http2.html > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:58 PM Jacques Le Roux > >> wrote: > >>> Hi Jacopo, > >>> > >>> Sounds

Re: Direct donations

2019-02-20 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Jacques, the link to the "Donations" page is mentioned in the first line of the "Sponsorship" page, so it should be easy to find anyway. However we could modify our footer item from "Sponsorship" to "Sponsorship and Donations" (in which each words redirects to the relevant page. Jacopo On

Re: Welcome to Mathieu Lirzin as new committer!

2019-02-19 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Welcome to the party, Mathieu! Jacopo On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Mathieu Lirzin to become a new committer and > we are happy to announce that he has accepted this role. > > Some of the reasons for inviting Mathieu include: > > - He is

Enabling HTTP/2 in the embedded Tomcat connectors

2019-02-18 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, I think it is time to enable the instance of Tomcat that is embedded in OFBiz to communicate using the HTTP/2 protocol, when the client supports it. For your review, before I commit, I am pasting here the patch that will enable it (it is quite simple) . In it I have enabled HTTP/2 by

Re: Oracle Java release model changes and consequences for the project

2019-02-13 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:51 PM Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > [...] For those who want to switch to oracle JDK, they can > easily do so, but we should perhaps stabilize on openjdk by default > and get the build system and documentation pointing to openjdk as a > long term solution to this problem.

Re: Oracle Java release model changes and consequences for the project

2019-02-13 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
0 > licensed and they are providing Java 8 and 11 LTS versions. > > Seems a good fit to me. > > Since Java 8 is LTS there, we do not necessarily have to upgrade OFBiz > for the use of Java 11. > > Best regards, > > Michael > > > Am 13.02.19 um 11:06 schrieb Jacopo Cappellat

Re: Oracle Java release model changes and consequences for the project

2019-02-13 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Considering that now Oracle JDKs are no more free for commercial use, I think that as a community we should make it a priority to suggest a different Java build in the README and other public documents. The simplest alternative (because it is the closest to Oracle JDK) is the Open JDK 11

Re: JobManager/JobPoller issues

2019-02-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:59 PM Scott Gray wrote: > [...] 2. The advice on the number of threads to use doesn't seem good to me, it > assumes your jobs are CPU bound when in my experience they are more likely > to be I/O bound while making db or external API calls, sending emails etc. > [...]

Re: git commit workflow for ofbiz

2019-01-22 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 for Git! Jacopo On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:01 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to revive this discussion again. > > Personally, I am now working with git for a few years and almost all > customer and company related projects have moved to git over time. In > the beginning, I

Re: [DISCUSSION] turn off OOTB JWT authorization/SSO functionality

2019-01-22 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 to disabling it by default. We could consider, rather than adding a new configuration flag, to disable the feature if no secret is set in the configuration files (and do not provide a secret out of the box). Jacopo On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 12:57 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi all, > > during

Re: Planning for the creation of new 18.12 branches

2018-12-28 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
I agree that to proceed and create the branch now and then, over the next few months, as a community we will refine our strategy and even decide on which of the various branches we should focus on more. Jacopo On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 1:59 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Yes, that would be a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

2018-12-10 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 to remove the functionality because it is a very old contribution that has been left incomplete for several years without much interest from community members. Jacopo On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:45 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to drag your attention to the Jira issue Dennis

Re: OFBIZ-9833 and the JWT secret storage

2018-11-16 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
My understanding is that we have one one method already implemented (i.e. password stored in security.properties) and the other methods proposed will need some sort of coding; if this is the case then I would not mention them in the comments because it could be confusing: instead we should

Re: OFBiz as Marketplace

2018-11-16 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
g separate plugin. Also looking > forward to see opinion from community, so that we can move with better plan > to execute. > > Best Regards, > -- > Rishi Solanki > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > Direct: +91-9893287847

Re: OFBiz as Marketplace

2018-11-15 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Rishi, this is an interesting initiative, thank you. There are various types of online marketplaces, each with unique and significant requirements, but if we focus on the ones like Amazon (since you have mentioned it) then we the following notes may apply pretty well. Main actors: * the

Re: Using plain Groovy classes for services.

2018-11-13 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Mathieu, thank you for starting this interesting conversation. I think it is fine to implement services in plain Java or in plain Groovy methods and you have highlighted some of the advantages over their implementation using the Groovy DSL. However in my opinion the Groovy DSL (even in its

Re: Groovy DSL runService Exception Management ?

2018-10-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:45 AM Gil Portenseigne < gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> wrote: > Hello ! > > While we are working on Groovy migration at Nereide, we figured out that > using ‘run service’ DSL method instead of returning the errorMap, a > ‘ExecutionServiceException’ is thrown [...] > I

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.05 released

2018-10-05 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache OFBiz 16.11.05". Apache OFBiz® is an open source product for the automation of enterprise processes that includes framework components and business applications. http://ofbiz.apache.org/ "Apache OFBiz 16.11.05" is the

[VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OFBiz 16.11.05

2018-10-02 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
e. Jacopo Cappellato On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:26 PM Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.05" will > supersede all

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.05

2018-10-02 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Jacopo On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:26 PM Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.05" will > supersede all the previo

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.05

2018-09-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.05" will supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are:

Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.05

2018-09-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
No feedback so far; I will proceed with the release preparation. Jacopo On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:09 AM Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > I am ready to prepare the release files and start a vote but before I do I > would like to double check abou

Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.05

2018-09-17 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
can just be part of a batch > as usual. > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 12:09 PM Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:47 PM Pierre Smits > > wrote: > > > > > Should OFBIZ-4361 not get resolved fo

Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.05

2018-09-14 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:47 PM Pierre Smits wrote: > Should OFBIZ-4361 not get resolved for this? It makes sense, thank you. I have posted a comment in the ticket and hopefully we will come up with a quick resolution. Should we wait a few more days to see if we can commit and test that work

Preparing the new release 16.11.05

2018-09-09 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, I think it is a good time to release a new bug fix release for the 16.11 branch, since the last one was released in January (approximately 6 months ago) and a series of bug fixes has been already backported. According to our naming rules, the release would be numbered as 16.11.05 because

Re: Move accounting ap and ar to plugin ?

2018-09-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 2:09 PM Nicolas Malin wrote: > Hello, > > After analyze the webapp accounting AR and accounting AP, I didn't see > any logic to keep them on the functional framework. The main webapp is > accounting, AP/AR are a business orientation that we can load at demand > through

Re: [Discussion]: Add method attribute to request-map (Was: svn commit: r1834389 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework...)

2018-06-28 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 to Taher's recommendations. Jacopo On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > A few comments: > > 1- I would suggest to try and avoid in the future committing any > design changes to the framework without discussing it properly in the > mailing list first > 2- I think it

Re: License issue with iText 4.2.0

2018-06-13 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > [...] > Of course we need to ask the legal team before taking a formal decision > about it. > I think we have now enough material to ask, and without opposition I'll > create a LEGAL Jira in a week. I

New ASF Member from OFBiz Community

2018-05-02 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Everyone, today the ASF has published the list of newly nominated members and "our" Deepak Dixit is one of them: https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the-apache-software-foundation-welcomes2

Re: Release notes lost in the new site

2018-04-16 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > Le 16/04/2018 à 11:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >> >> H

Re: Release notes lost in the new site

2018-04-16 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
t; www.hotwaxsystems.com >>> www.hotwax.co >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 7:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Deepak >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>&g

Release notes lost in the new site

2018-04-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, I have noticed that, with the migration to the new site, we have lost a few of the release notes linked from here: http://www.apache.org/dist/ofbiz/ For example the following are lost and should be recovered: http://ofbiz.apache.org/release-notes-12.04.06.html

Re: Check for only QOH while doing reservations

2018-04-10 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Thanks Suraj, after reviewing that old commit I am inclined to think that the change you are suggesting makes sense. Before that old commit all the inventory items (regardless of their type and qty) were selected and there was logic to iterate thru the result set and exclude the ones with the

Re: ofbiz.apache.org to comply with https://whimsy.apache.org/site/

2018-04-10 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Thank you Deepak. I have noticed that your last commit has already fixed the first issue (Foundation). For the one related to the Security page, the best way to go is in my opinion to move the current content to a new security.html page. Jacopo On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:16 AM, Deepak Dixit <

Re: svn commit: r1815412 - in /ofbiz: ofbiz-framework/trunk/NOTICE ofbiz-framework/trunk/themes/rainbowstone/README.md tools/rat-excludes.txt

2018-04-06 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Another option could be to replace this font by another one from Category > A, like Google "Noto Sans" or what not > This is my preference: I prefer to avoid to make our product license trickier just to

Re: svn commit: r1815412 - in /ofbiz: ofbiz-framework/trunk/NOTICE ofbiz-framework/trunk/themes/rainbowstone/README.md tools/rat-excludes.txt

2018-04-05 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Yes, will you do the move? Yes, I will take care of it Jacopo

Re: svn commit: r1815412 - in /ofbiz: ofbiz-framework/trunk/NOTICE ofbiz-framework/trunk/themes/rainbowstone/README.md tools/rat-excludes.txt

2018-04-05 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
ts.com> wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > > Le 04/04/2018 à 12:12, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> Hi Jacques, >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:54 AM, <jler...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Author: jleroux >>> Date: Thu Nov 16 05:54:23 2017 &

Re: svn commit: r1815412 - in /ofbiz: ofbiz-framework/trunk/NOTICE ofbiz-framework/trunk/themes/rainbowstone/README.md tools/rat-excludes.txt

2018-04-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Jacques, On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:54 AM, wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Thu Nov 16 05:54:23 2017 > New Revision: 1815412 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1815412=rev > Log: > No functional change. > > With this fix, about the Quicksand Google font licensed

Re: svn commit: r1827439 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/common/servicedef/services.xml

2018-03-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Did you try what I said? > > You can easily check by svn updating to r1819133 and removing the wrapper > in ContextFilter.java. > > Maybe we need to revert Tomcat SSO then? A thorough review of that

Welcome Paul Foxworthy as a new PMC member

2018-03-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The OFBiz PMC has invited Paul Foxworthy to become a new member of the committee and we are glad to announce that Paul has accepted the nomination. Welcome on board Paul! Jacopo Cappellato (on behalf of the OFBiz PMC)

Re: Oracle Java release model changes and consequences for the project

2018-01-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Thank you Michael for starting this thread. When discussing this, we will also have to consider that OFBiz currently depends on several other Open Source products that will have to be compatible with the platform we will choose (however, considering that backward compatibility is maintained in new

Re: svn commit: r1820740 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/branches/release17.12: ./ themes/rainbowstone/config/rainbowstone.properties

2018-01-10 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Jacques, in this commit you also changed appMax from 8 to 12. Jacopo On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:56 PM, wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Wed Jan 10 11:56:45 2018 > New Revision: 1820740 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820740=rev > Log: > "Applied fix from

Re: Clarification about Jira version named "16.11.02"

2018-01-09 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Done, should we not remove R14 and R15 version? > > This is a good question. In fact I have spent some time thinking about it and I propose to archive all the Jira versions for "release branches" that are: *

Re: Clarification about Jira version named "16.11.02"

2018-01-08 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
; > > > Le 09/11/2017 à 10:13, Deepak Dixit a écrit : > >> Thanks Jacopo for detail, >> >> I found some some issues that have Trunk as fix version, I think it should >> be "Upcoming Release" >> >> And if fixes backported to older release it sh

Re: [DISCUSSION] Disentanglement of the ExampleExt component

2018-01-08 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Scott is making a good point about entity-ext: in my opinion the design is good (but can be improved). I suspect that commonext and exampleext have a less clean implementation and maybe they do not even implement that pattern, I see less value in them. One comment on entity-ext: In my opinion we

Re: Proposal to remove the "Special Notice" section from the OFBiz download page

2018-01-05 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
ot; or similar, so that we do not have to > maintain this section when the releases change. > > Regards, > > Michael > > > Am 05.01.18 um 11:02 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: > > Hi all, >> >> I think we should now remove the section titled "Special No

Proposal to remove the "Special Notice" section from the OFBiz download page

2018-01-05 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, I think we should now remove the section titled "Special Notice Regarding Branches 14.12 and 15.12" from the OFBiz download page: https://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html The page should only list the most recent release from each actively maintained branch; the section has been useful

Re: Variables created from properties should not be final

2018-01-05 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Michael Brohl wrote: > [...] So, > > -1 for applying this as a general rule, > +1 for a thorough review of the 53 cases and changes where they make sense. > I agree with the reasoning and conclusions above; to them I would add my: +1

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.04 released

2018-01-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache OFBiz 16.11.04". Apache OFBiz® is an open source product for the automation of enterprise processes that includes framework components and business applications. http://ofbiz.apache.org/ "Apache OFBiz 16.11.04" is the

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.04

2018-01-02 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The vote is successful thanks to 6 binding and 2 non binding positive (i.e. "+1") votes and no negative votes. I am going to publish the release files. Thank you! Jacopo On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: &g

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.04

2018-01-02 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Jacopo On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.04" will > supersede all t

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

2017-12-28 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Le 28/12/2017 à 13:09, Michael Brohl a écrit : > >> Regarding the website: >> >> 1. do we keep the 16.11 listed there as the stable release branch >> > Yes, until we release 17.12 > > and add 17.12? >> > No,

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

2017-12-28 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
We have now the release branches: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/branches/release17.12/ https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/branches/release17.12/ Please review them and make any adjustments required; we should also update our website:

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.04

2017-12-24 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.04" will supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are:

Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

2017-12-20 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
think we can keep this branch alive for more time since it is the only active release branch and the new one will need to be stabilized. Jacopo > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > > Le 19/12/2017 à 16:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> we ha

Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?

2017-12-19 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, we have published our last release mostly 6 months ago and since then we have merged several bug fixes to our 16.11 branch: I think it is time to publish a new one! If there are no objections I am going to prepare the release files in the next few days and then we will start the release

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

2017-12-19 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
My preference is to create the branch now and discuss on a case by case the backporting of any additional feature. Jacopo On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Le 18/12/2017 à 18:02, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> On Mon,

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

2017-12-18 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
s in the >>> coming days/weeks, hopefully all of the currently open issues. >>> >>> It would be great if we can move the release to December. >>> >>> @all: any help on the FindBugs/refactoring issues by fellow committers >>> are greatly appreciated ;-) >

Re: svn commit: r1818093 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/README.md

2017-12-14 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Michael Brohl wrote: > I suggest to create an FAQ or "known issues" section in our wiki and have > a section in the README.md like "further reading" or "additional infos" > etc. which contain the links. > > Regards, > > Michael > +1

Re: svn commit: r1817750 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/base/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ base/component: ComponentConfig.java ComponentLoaderConfig.java ComponentResourceHandler.java

2017-12-11 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Thank you Michael! Please see a minor comment inline: On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Michael Brohl wrote: > > I will check my latest commits and change this back where it is reasonable > (i.e. where we have concatenations). > Actually this is not only relevant for

Re: svn commit: r1817750 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/base/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ base/component: ComponentConfig.java ComponentLoaderConfig.java ComponentResourceHandler.java

2017-12-11 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > [...] > Also for OFBIZ-9872 the Jira lacks a description to possibly understand > why theses changes (notably why you rightly removed the "if > (Debug.verboseOn())" test because it's done at the bottom level

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

2017-11-29 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
pattern consistent. > Also > > may be others may have more tickets/bugs with them. > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > -- > > Rishi Solanki > > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > > Direct: +91-989328784

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

2017-11-28 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > Agree to create the release 17.11 with a separate products framework & > plugins. > > It's woulb be nice to create this release one week after the next > community days :) > > Nicolas > > > >

Re: Translating simple-method codes to Groovy

2017-11-28 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Dennis, in general the best way to go is to wrap up the Minilang method into a service definition and then convert simple-method-call into service-call. For this specific case, genericBasePermissionCheck, you will find that the method has been already wrapped into the homonymous service so you

Re: svn commit: r1813964 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbi z/entity/util/EntityCrypto.java

2017-11-07 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Jacques, the pattern/best practice you are describing is definitely a valid one, thanks for your explanations. However, in this specific case, re-throwing the RuntimeException would not work because when the field is encrypted with the old algorithm (3-DES), the new Shiro code will fail to

Re: Updates to EntityQuery

2017-10-27 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > [...] The idea of NoSQL is to think at a different conceptual level of > your domain model. > I agree! In order to leverage the power of NoSQL databases you have to write your code accordingly and apply

Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

2017-10-10 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all, I think it is time to start thinking about if, when, how we should create the new release branch out of the trunk. Actually, for the first time, we should probably create two branches: one for the framework and one for the plugins. What do you think? In my opinion we could try to get all

Re: Help Needed to move our new website live

2017-08-29 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
est. 1997 <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Sharan Foga <sharan.f...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks everyone for getting this live! Now let's make some noise about our >>> brand new site :-) >>> >

Re: Help Needed to move our new website live

2017-08-29 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Congratulations, the new site looks great! Thank you Sharan, Kenneth and everyone who helped in this effort. Jacopo On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Deepak Dixit < deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Just to update you all, now its working fine > > Nice work Kenneth and Sharan. I found

Re: Error when processing doap file http://ofbiz.apache.org/doap_OFBiz.rdf:

2017-08-28 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Jacques, are you sure it is the norm? As far as I remember, there are two options to publish the PMC rdf file: one is by keeping it into the comdev folder (out of our project svn) and the other is by maintaining it in our svn space and adding a reference to it from the comdav space. The latter is

Re: Updating our OFBiz Blog Template

2017-08-25 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Le 25/08/2017 à 12:34, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >> >> [...] >

Re: Updating our OFBiz Blog Template

2017-08-25 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > [...] > Now, reading Kenneth's message, I think we should try to invite him as a > committer ASAP, hoping he will like the idea :) > > Let's not discuss nominations in the dev list please. Jacopo

Re: What is the meaning of the code in JmsListenerFactory?

2017-08-16 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
e.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > Did you continue to investigate ? > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > Le 26/07/2012 à 17:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>>

Re: [Proposal] moving all data in applications to the data-model component

2017-07-17 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 to everything you wrote. I will do my best to help with the initiative. Thank you Taher. Jacopo On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Taher Alkhateeb < slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Data loading in OFBiz is quite fragile. A small change could crash the > system and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Backporting bugs Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9459) Wrong screen redirection after adding note on Lead profile screen

2017-07-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
1. in most cases so maybe it's not getting > too much of a problem. > > Maybe we should also have a process to check the "backport-needed" issues > some time before a planned release to avoid this? > > Michael > > > Am 12.07.17 um 16:16 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Backporting bugs Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9459) Wrong screen redirection after adding note on Lead profile screen

2017-07-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 to the agreed upon output of this conversation (thank you Michael). One little problem we will have to face is that, with the new workflow, a bug that has been fixed in one branch and left open (waiting for a backport) will not appear in the release notes of the branch. Jacopo On Mon, Jul 10,

Re: [Discussion] Failing the build if data loading fails

2017-07-10 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > Historically the data loader boolean props are false if ommitted and the > code expects that, but you have a point about the double negative. We can > instead call it "continue-on-failure" for example. +1

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.03 released

2017-07-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache OFBiz 16.11.03". Apache OFBiz® is an open source product for the automation of enterprise processes that includes framework components and business applications. http://ofbiz.apache.org/ "Apache OFBiz 16.11.03" is the

Re: Suggest to improve groovy DSL -> entity-one

2017-07-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Nicolas, On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > I was sure that this thread will pick your interest ;) > Indeed it did :-) > Le 01/07/2017 à 10:59, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> ... >>

Re: Suggest to improve groovy DSL

2017-07-01 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Nicolas, thank you, this is great feedback! Please see some comments inline: On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote: > Hello > > I found some idea to improve the groovy DSL during my first try to convert > mini-lang. > I don't know if it's possible

[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 16.11.03 - second attempt

2017-06-29 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The vote is successful thanks to 7 binding and 2 non binding positive (i.e. "+1") votes and no negative votes. I am going to publish the release files. Thank you, Jacopo On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.03 - second attempt

2017-06-29 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Jacopo On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread for the second attempt to release a new bug fix > release for the release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz > 16.11.03" wi

Re: Reducing excessive and improperly studied commits

2017-06-29 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Review Than Commit should be used more often. I also wish that Jacques, from now on, will to be less resistant to requests to revert his commits: the act of reverting a commit is not a shame on the author nor a punishment but instead it is a mechanism that helps to keep the code clean while

Re: source-repositories.html and no longer supported branches

2017-06-22 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Good catch! I think we should drop the links to all the release branches except release16.11. Regards, Jacopo On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Should we continue to show the no longer supported branches at >

Re: Release file check script Re: svn commit: r1799436 - /ofbiz/tools/verify-ofbiz-release.sh

2017-06-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Thank you Michael, I have created the new release files and started the second vote so now we will all have a chance to use your script! Jacopo On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've added a convenience bash script to check the

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.03 - second attempt

2017-06-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
This is the vote thread for the second attempt to release a new bug fix release for the release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.03" will supersede the recently published 16.11.02 release that was affected by a major bug (OFBIZ-9410). The release files can be downloaded from

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.03

2017-06-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
since no one has voted yet, I would like to cancel this vote and restart a new one to include the fix with rev. 1799419 At least we will have a bit more to add to the release notes of 16.11.03 Jacopo On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com>

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.03

2017-06-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.03" will supersede the recently published 16.11.02 release that was affected by a major bug (OFBIZ-9410). The release files can be downloaded from here:

Re: New release 16.11.03? was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9410) Software not usable all standard installs failed

2017-06-19 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
nks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > www.hotwax.co > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > I am going to start the process to issue the new release today. >

Re: New release 16.11.03? was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9410) Software not usable all standard installs failed

2017-06-18 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
I am going to start the process to issue the new release today. Jacopo On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I totally agree, and as quickly as possible. Thanks to Daniel Coric, I was > able to fix it in a reasonable time (facepalm,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Restructure OFBiz Wiki

2017-05-29 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Thank you Michael, I second your proposal! Jacopo On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Michael Brohl wrote: > Dear all, > > according to OFBIZ-9171 [1] I am trying to get some ground to restructure > our wiki pages. Digging deeper, it becomes more clear to me that we

Tweet about the new release

2017-05-25 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
It would be great if someone with access to our official @ApacheOfbiz Twitter account would post a tweet about the new release 16.11.02 Thanks, Jacopo

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.02 released

2017-05-24 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache OFBiz 16.11.02". Apache OFBiz® is an open source product for the automation of enterprise processes that includes framework components and business applications. http://ofbiz.apache.org/ "Apache OFBiz 16.11.02" is the

[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 16.11.02

2017-05-22 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The vote is successful with 9 binding and 3 non-binding "+1" votes and no negative votes. I will proceed with the steps to prepare the publication of the release. Thanks! Jacopo On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsyste

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.02

2017-05-22 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 Jacopo On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.02" will > supersede the 16.11.01

Re: [DISCUSSION] migrate mini lang to Java and/or groovy

2017-05-19 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
My preference is to migrate to the Groovy DSL, and enhance it if required. The Groovy DSL is the natural evolution of the core concepts and strengths of Minilang and is preferable, in my opinion, to plain Java for the implementation of business logic. Jacopo On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:38 PM,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >