+1
Thanks Scott,
Michael
Am 20.11.21 um 02:47 schrieb Scott Gray:
(Removing the private list since the discussion has no place there)
I don't think this topic needs any further debate at this stage. Pierre
objects to having the tickets closed, so we can leave them open since that
is the
(Removing the private list since the discussion has no place there)
I don't think this topic needs any further debate at this stage. Pierre
objects to having the tickets closed, so we can leave them open since that
is the easiest path and doesn't really come at any cost.
We don't need to
Hello Pierre,
Inline,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 06:48:40PM +0100, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Hi Gil, All,
>
> My apologies, but I have to object to this and for the following reasoning:
> Objections to pursuing improvements to the entity definition (for
> PartyRole) and subsequent addressing front-end
Hi Gil, All,
My apologies, but I have to object to this and for the following reasoning:
Objections to pursuing improvements to the entity definition (for
PartyRole) and subsequent addressing front-end issues (screens/forms,
requests, services etc) for that and other entities impacted were
Hello,
I will try to summarize the ongoing thread, to produce a conclusion or
potential plan. Sorry in advance, if I forgot some points.
About the improvement of adding lifespan in PartyRole entity, the "Won't do"
seems to get the consensus, since this improvement do not follow logical
purpose
