Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

:) Thanks Jacopo Nicolas On 22/10/2021 00:37, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Nice! I can prepare the release files for the vote during the weekend (if > not tomorrow). > > Jacopo > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:00 PM Nicolas Malin > wrote: > >> My thinks, Lets rock ! >> >> I propose to start the vote

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Nice! I can prepare the release files for the vote during the weekend (if not tomorrow). Jacopo On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:00 PM Nicolas Malin wrote: > My thinks, Lets rock ! > > I propose to start the vote publication :) > If I can help to prepare anything, I'm available ! > > Nicolas > > On

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

My thinks, Lets rock ! I propose to start the vote publication :) If I can help to prepare anything, I'm available ! Nicolas On 21/10/2021 15:53, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Actually it should be OK now after last exchange between Nicolas and > Michael > > Le 21/10/2021 à 15:35, Pierre Smits a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Actually it should be OK now after last exchange between Nicolas and Michael Le 21/10/2021 à 15:35, Pierre Smits a écrit : I guess it is still ongoing. Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz since 2008 (without privileges)

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

I guess it is still ongoing. Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz since 2008 (without privileges) *Apache Directory , PMC Member* Apache Incubator , committer Apache

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Heyho, What's the status here? Jacques Le 16/10/2021 à 09:17, Nicolas Malin a écrit : Nice, thanks for your return. Can we close the OFBIZ-12171 ? I propose to wait the benjamin's return on the OFBIZ-12016 [1] on the fix proposed by Jacques [2] and if we haven't any blocking issue, start

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hello On 12/10/2021 13:25, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > Should we not introduce the notion of LTS* for releases (and not LTS > for some releases)? It's now used for long by softwares like Ubuntu, > and even by Apache projects like Camel, CloudStack and others. What do > you think? This idea

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Nice, thanks for your return. Can we close the OFBIZ-12171 ? I propose to wait the benjamin's return on the OFBIZ-12016 [1] on the fix proposed by Jacques [2] and if we haven't any blocking issue, start the publish process. Cheers, Nicolas [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12016

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hi Nicolas, I have checked the jcenter problems together with Wiebke and Benjamin during the week. The both were not able to get to the build failure with deactivated access to jcenter, even with removing the Gradle caches, wrappers and new initialisation with init-gradle-wrapper. I just

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hello Michael, Gradle community create a dedicate page for this problem [1], If my understanding is correct, we (massively you :) ) already done the job to prepare the shutdown, and for the current potential issue that we have, I read :  > Impact to Gradle plugins  >   Behind the scenes, the

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hi, Should we not introduce the notion of LTS* for releases (and not LTS for some releases)? It's now used for long by softwares like Ubuntu, and even by Apache projects like Camel, CloudStack and others. What do you think? *Long Time Support Jacques Le 12/10/2021 à 10:24, Michael Brohl a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hi Nicolas, all, I just checked the jcenter problem [1] and it still remains when you deactivate access to jcenter.bintray.com as shown in [2] and clean the gradle cache. According to [1], we'll have to upgrade Gradle itself for the branch. Best regards, Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH -

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hi Nicolas, thanks for your message! I really would like to work on it but I am currently (over)occupied with client projects. I'll try to organise some support with the ecomify team. I am also interested in getting the 18.12 release out as we have some projects based on it. Thanks and

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hello Michael, Any chance to work together on it soon ? Nicolas On 29/09/2021 09:20, Nicolas Malin wrote: > Hello Michael, > > No problem to resolve these issue before. > > Currently for jcenter, I tried to restart from scratch and from my part > I didn't see any issue but sure I missed

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hello Michael, No problem to resolve these issue before. Currently for jcenter, I tried to restart from scratch and from my part I didn't see any issue but sure I missed something Concerning the DiskFileItem, I tried to work on it, but without success to spot the problem. If you have some time

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hi Nicolas, there a issues which I think should be fixed before an 18.12 release, for example the JCenter migration problem [1] or the DiskFileItem topic [2]. There are many more bugs also which I didn't check. Regards, Michael [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12171 [2]

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

I finished to review all task identify as available to merge before release the 18.12. >From my part test integration suite is ok with plugin, so I think we are ready to start the publish process :) Nicolas On 27/09/2021 09:48, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > +1 > > Jacopo > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

+1 Jacopo On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:35 AM Nicolas Malin wrote: > > Hello, > > I can work this week to control and merge the available patch, and after > we can start the vote. > > For other issues, its can wait the next publication. > > Nicolas > > On 22/09/2021 11:19, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hello, I can work this week to control and merge the available patch, and after we can start the vote. For other issues, its can wait the next publication. Nicolas On 22/09/2021 11:19, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > Also for information this is what we get when we include all R18 > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hi, Also for information this is what we get when we include all R18

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

Hi Nicolas, That's not exactly what I find: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20%3D%2018.12.01 Jacques Le 20/09/2021 à 10:14, Nicolas Malin a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

+1 Thanks, Gil On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Nicolas Malin wrote: > The main is on the title :) > > At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide > whether to launch and move them to the next. > > My feeling is after some time on it, we can go ahead and keep

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

+1 Jacopo On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:13 AM Nicolas Malin wrote: > > The main is on the title :) > > At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide > whether to launch and move them to the next. > > My feeling is after some time on it, we can go ahead and keep their fix >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12321?jql=resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20%3D%2018.12.01 :D forgot the link On 20/09/2021 10:13, Nicolas Malin wrote: > The main is on the title :) > > At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide >

[DISCUSSION] Do we start the R18 publish process ?

The main is on the title :) At this time some issue are always present [1], so we have to decide whether to launch and move them to the next. My feeling is after some time on it, we can go ahead and keep their fix for the next when it would be possible. Nicolas -- logoNrd