Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

ke a element that I can easily > link to an FTL template without going through Java or XSD files. > > my 2 cents. > > Taher Alkhateeb > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, 16 M

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

, 16 May, 2015 10:38:50 AM Subject: Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz] Le 16/05/2015 04:09, Ean Schuessler a écrit : >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" >> Subject: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz] >> Actually maybe I'm misunderstanding

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

Le 16/05/2015 04:09, Ean Schuessler a écrit : From: "Jacques Le Roux" Subject: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz] Actually maybe I'm misunderstanding you and I also want to clarify with everybody. I will try to be brief and right to the point! Do you (we) want

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

> From: "Jacques Le Roux" > Subject: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz] > Actually maybe I'm misunderstanding you and I also want to clarify with > everybody. I will try to be brief and right to the point! > > Do you (we) want to replace the widge

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

There has been interest lately in using a REST interface to the OFBiz service engine - so the UI can be pure client-side JavaScript, and the UI is updated dynamically using XML or JSON calls to the REST API. That design would be a huge task, but it could create a truly impressive UI. I will ref

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

I agree with the "gem" ranking level at which widgets are placed and find it a worthy effort to convert as much FTL to widgets as possible because widgets extremely faster to interpret than FTL files. However, sometimes the framework has to be extended to support all of the FTL features which adds

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

Thanks both for clarifying, exactly my thoughts, happy we are on the same page :) More (different) opinions? Jacques Le 14/05/2015 13:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : Several issues have been registered recently to migrate specific ftl functions to widgets. And patches have been attached. These jus

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

Several issues have been registered recently to migrate specific ftl functions to widgets. And patches have been attached. These just need a review and get committed. Yes, the use of ftl functionality is overwhelming. Even when it is not needed at all. E.g. defining standard screenlet functionalit

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

Hi Community I have not been able to continue the work on the bootstrap theme for the past few months now and therefore resisted the urge to comment on various threads in the mailing list about matters related. So maybe apologies are in order. Having said that, these are my thoughts: 1. The UI,

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

Below are some, but this question is more to shake things a bit and know what people think I think everybody will agree that the Entity Engine is the gem of this project, follows the Service Engine. I believe, though less polished, the widgets are 3rnd, but that's only my opinion and I'd really

Re: Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

But what are the proposals? Where can these be found? Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le

Widget or not Widget? [Was Re: Addons for OFBiz]

Actually maybe I'm misunderstanding you and I also want to clarify with everybody. I will try to be brief and right to the point! Do you (we) want to replace the widgets by something like Ean and Anil proposed many times, or do we want to improve them using these new tools? Jacques Le 13/05/2