; that, I have proposed a workflow to see if people are interested in
> it.
> > But
> > >> the topic just slowly died out.
> > >>> The links to both threads are listed below. I understand that there
> was
> > >> a lot of interest in the
I understand that there was
> >> a lot of interest in the community as the thread was really long. I
> would
> >> like to revive the discussion and see if people are still interested in
> >> implementing / amending the proposed workflow if they find it appealing.
>
+workflow
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: "Taher Alkhateeb"
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2015 5:25:31 PM
Subject: Re: git commit workflow for ofbiz
Hi Jacques,
Very good read, thank you for sharing.
The person who wrote complaining about gitflo
: "Taher Alkhateeb"
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2015 5:25:31 PM
Subject: Re: git commit workflow for ofbiz
Hi Jacques,
Very good read, thank you for sharing.
The person who wrote complaining about gitflow (I think Adam Ruka) makes
a good point. He pref
Something else that we will need to do:
The equivalent of svn:auto-props properties on server.
Something we will need to not forget when we will switch to Git:
https://help.github.com/articles/dealing-with-line-endings/#per-repository-settings
Jacques
Le 16/01/2019 à 13:04, Jacques Le Roux a
ote thread :
> http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/ldo77qz34kte4gat?q=move+to+git+from:%22Hans+Bakker%22+list:org.apache.ofbiz.dev=1
> >
> > workflow proposition thread :
> http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/nkthnbsgt37orynu?q=git+commit+workflow
> >
> > Taher Alkhatee
+1 for Git.
Thanks, Michael for reviving this discussion.
Regards
--
Pritam Kute
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:30 PM Taher Alkhateeb
wrote:
> Hi Jacques, I know you are a GUI fan, and for that I recommend this
> tool https://git-cola.github.io
>
> Make sure to install all requirements for a full
Thanks Taher,
I'm already well used to TortoiseGit and tried before a couple of others but I prefer it (because I also use TortoiseSvn for 14 years). I have also
Git installed in Eclipse, there are few stuff that I like there.
I also often use Git Bash and when really necessary (never
Hi Jacques, I know you are a GUI fan, and for that I recommend this
tool https://git-cola.github.io
Make sure to install all requirements for a full enjoyable experience
including viewing the history visually and whatnot
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:56 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We
Hi,
We have some tasks to do (like revert and merge scripts) but I see no problems
with that.
Apart that I have to think a bit more about the workflow (I guess Taher's
proposition should be fine)
I must though say that you will certainly see a slow-down on my side. I'm used to a bunch of svn
+1 for using Git.
Personally, my experience is also very good with Git.
- Best Regards,
Swapnil M Mane
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 2:05 PM Nicolas Malin
wrote:
> On 12/01/2019 20:56, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
> > It's awesome to revive this discussion Michael. +1 of course.
> >
> > We need to think
On 12/01/2019 20:56, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
It's awesome to revive this discussion Michael. +1 of course.
We need to think practically of our workflows though and whether we
want a linear vs non-linear history model. I prefer the latter to
allow proper decentralized workflows but it's up to
+1 for Git.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Nigam
HotWax Systems.Pvt. Ltd
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:53 AM Yashwant Dhakad <
yashwant.dha...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> +1 for Git
>
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Yashwant Dhakad
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 1:27 AM Taher Alkhateeb <
>
+1 for Git
Thanks & Regards
--
Yashwant Dhakad
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 1:27 AM Taher Alkhateeb
wrote:
> It's awesome to revive this discussion Michael. +1 of course.
>
> We need to think practically of our workflows though and whether we
> want a linear vs non-linear history model. I prefer
It's awesome to revive this discussion Michael. +1 of course.
We need to think practically of our workflows though and whether we
want a linear vs non-linear history model. I prefer the latter to
allow proper decentralized workflows but it's up to everyone here to
decide. I think the overall
We are using git since long and it's a great tool for collaboration.
It has distributed version control system so you don't need an internet
connection to view history and branch switching.
Thanks Taher for nicly describing it.
+1 for Git.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
On Sat, Jan 12,
+1 for Git
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Sharma
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019, 9:06 PM Suraj Khurana +1 to move from SVN to Git.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Suraj Khurana
> Technical Consultant
>
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 7:12 PM Mathieu Lirzin
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > Michael Brohl writes:
> >
+1 to move from SVN to Git.
--
Best Regards,
Suraj Khurana
Technical Consultant
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 7:12 PM Mathieu Lirzin
wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Michael Brohl writes:
>
> > I'd like to revive this discussion again.
>
> Do we still need to discuss it? If the response is not
Hello Michael,
Michael Brohl writes:
> I'd like to revive this discussion again.
Do we still need to discuss it? If the response is not obviously “yes
we should move to Git” now that Git has become ubiquitous and that SVN
is a moribund tool, then this community has a serious problem. :-)
ote thread :
> http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/ldo77qz34kte4gat?q=move+to+git+from:%22Hans+Bakker%22+list:org.apache.ofbiz.dev=1
> >
> > workflow proposition thread :
> http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/nkthnbsgt37orynu?q=git+commit+workflow
> >
> > Taher Alkhatee
ateeb"
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2015 5:25:31 PM
Subject: Re: git commit workflow for ofbiz
Hi Jacques,
Very good read, thank you for sharing.
The person who wrote complaining about gitflow (I think Adam Ruka) makes a good point. He
prefers linear to branched his
://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/nkthnbsgt37orynu?q=git+commit+workflow
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: "Taher Alkhateeb" <slidingfilame...@gmail.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2015 5:25:31 PM
Subject: Re: git commit workflow for ofb
If you get a chance to read these articles I highly recommend them
http://www.alwaysagileconsulting.com/organisation-pattern-trunk-based-development/
http://endoflineblog.com/gitflow-considered-harmful
http://endoflineblog.com/follow-up-to-gitflow-considered-harmful
Jacques
Le 12/05/2015
Le 24/06/2015 14:06, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
If you get a chance to read these articles I highly recommend them
http://www.alwaysagileconsulting.com/organisation-pattern-trunk-based-development/
Of course don't miss
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2015 4:19:42 PM
Subject: Re: git commit workflow for ofbiz
Le 24/06/2015 14:06, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
If you get a chance to read these articles I highly recommend them
http://www.alwaysagileconsulting.com
Nice. This is quite thorough. There is an option missing. SVN
committers who use git offline. In this case, their changes can be
published as primary SVN branches, for collaboration.. See OFBIZ-6271
in JIRA, and as an SVN branch, for an example.
I've read through most of what follows, and
Hi everyone,
This email refers to the thread for voting to move to git (link at bottom) in
which the vote decision was to delay and elaborate on the workflow first. I am
not well versed in ASF guidelines and appreciate any help and feedback and also
please note some of the below is my opinion
27 matches
Mail list logo
